| Literature DB >> 32290370 |
Andrea Crețu1, Carlos Mattea1, Siegfried Stapf1, Ioan Ardelean2.
Abstract
The present work systematically investigates the influence of silica fume and organosilane addition on the hydration dynamics and the capillary pore formation of a cement paste. The cement samples were prepared with two water-to-cement ratios with increasing amounts of silica fume and of (3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) organosilane. Low-field 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation measurements were performed during the hydration of the samples and after hydration, in order to reveal the dynamics of water molecules and the pore distribution. Increasing concentrations of silica fume impact the perceived hydration dynamics through the addition of magnetic impurities to the pore solution. However, there is a systematic change in the capillary pore size distribution with an increase in silica fume concentration. The results also show that the addition of APTES majorly affects the hydration dynamics, by prolonging the dormancy and hardening stages. While it does not influence the pore size distribution of capillary pores, it prevents cyclohexane from saturating the capillary pores.Entities:
Keywords: 1H NMR; APTES; organosilane; porosity; portland cement; silica fume
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32290370 PMCID: PMC7221553 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25081762
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Recipes for the samples investigated in the present study.
| Sample | Water/Cement | Organosilane (%) | Silica Fume (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0.4 | 0 | 2 |
|
| 0.4 | 0 | 4 |
|
| 0.4 | 0 | 6 |
|
| 0.4 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 0.4 | 1 | 2 |
|
| 0.4 | 1 | 4 |
|
| 0.4 | 1 | 6 |
|
| 0.3 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 0.3 | 1 | 2 |
|
| 0.3 | 1 | 4 |
|
| 0.3 | 1 | 6 |
|
| 0.3 | 2 | 0 |
|
| 0.3 | 2 | 2 |
|
| 0.3 | 2 | 4 |
|
| 0.3 | 2 | 6 |
Figure 1Evolution of the probability density of T2 during the first 30 h of hydration in the case of sample 400. Only T2 with the maximum probability is extracted for each hour. Inset: Probability density distribution of T2 values at 30 min. after mixing.
Figure 2Evolution of the T2 value with the maximum probability for the indicated samples: (a) 400–406; (b) 410–416; (c) 310–316; and, (d) 320–326. The different stages of hydration are outlined for each set of samples.
Figure 3T2 distributions in all sets of samples. The samples were saturated with cyclohexane, after hydration.
Figure 4The position of the peak maximum in the case of intra-C-S-H water (a) and capillary cyclohexane (b).