Literature DB >> 32289798

Clinical Trials during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.

David G Warnock1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32289798      PMCID: PMC7179533          DOI: 10.1159/000507582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephron        ISSN: 1660-8151            Impact factor:   2.847


× No keyword cloud information.
In this issue of Nephron, Perico, Benigni, and Remuzzi offer a concise overview of the interactions of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) pathway(s), and the cell surface glycoprotein ACE2, and describe the mechanism of cellular SARS-CoV-2 uptake via the endocytosis-lysosomal pathway [1]. There is growing interest in using 4-aminoquinolines to prevent and/or treat COVID-19, which is the clinical syndrome associated with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This class of drugs has an ancient history starting with the recorded use of quinine in 1640 and in cutaneous lupus in 1894, and development of a large number of congeners (including chloroquinoline and hydroxyquinoline) for malarial prophylaxis during World War II [2]. The use of 4-aminochloroquines for prophylaxis of malaria does not appear to involve the endosomal-lysosomal pathway, while the lipophilicity and pK > 7.4 are central to the antiviral and antibacterial effects of the 4-aminochloroquines [2]. The lay press is filled with reports of antidotal treatment approaches meant to decrease the severity of COVID-19, many of which include 4-aminochloroquines in an uncontrolled fashion. Clinicaltrials.gov lists >100 entries for SARS-CoV-2 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond = SARS-CoV+Infection&draw = 2&rank = 17#rowId16), but most trials are not yet recruiting (Table 1).
Table 1

Abbreviated summary of clinical trials evaluating the effects of hydroxychloroquine and other agents on COVID-19 (updated March 26, 2020)

CountryTrial registryDesignSetting, severityActive arm(s)PLC armOutcomesReference
Canada (Nova Scotia Health Authority)NCT #: 04321993Nonrandom, parallel assignment; open labelHospitalized patients (1,000 subjects)Lopinavir/ritonavir
OHChlor
Baricitinib
Sarilumab
Clinical status scale while hospitalized, and at 15, 29, and 180 daysGoodall et al. NCT #: 04321993 (not yet recruiting)

ChinaNCT #: 04252885Open label, randomHospital, mild to moderate COVID-19Lopinavir/ritonavir (21)
Arbidol (16)
7No sig diff: SARS-CoV-2 clearance, antipyretic, clinical statusLi et al. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.19.20038984

FranceEU clin trials; 2020-000890-25Open label, randomized, nonrandomHospital, non-ICUOHChlor (20)16Reduced viral load, patients transferred to ICU excluded from treatment-arm analysisGautret et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949

Italy (Bergamo)Observational case-control studyHospital, before and after ICU admission with ARDSSarilumabReduced need for mechanical ventilation, ICU days, 30-day mortalityRetrospective case-matched controls for both treatment arms (anti-IL6 mAb)

US (Columbia University)NCT #: 04318444Randomized, double blindHousehold contact of confirmed casesOHChlor (800)80014 days: sympotmatic COVID-19, or virus- positive COVID-19NCT #: 04318444 (not yet recruiting)

US (University of Minnesota)NCT #: 04308668Randomized, double blindAsymptomatic: healthcare workers, or COVID-19-positive household memberOHChlor (800)80014 days: SARS-CoV-2 positive, COVID-19 severity scale, 90-day mortalityNCT #: 04308668 (active nationwide recruitment)

US (NIAID)NCT #: 04280705Randomized, double-blind, adaptive trial designHospitalized with COVID-19 symptoms and positive SARS-CoV-2 viral testRemdesivir (200)20015 days: COVID-19 severity scaleNCT #: 04280705; multiple sites, actively recruiting

ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19, disease related to SARS-CoV-2 infection; ICU, intensive care unit; mAb, monoclonal antibody; OHChlor, hydroxychloroquine; PLC, placebo; random, randomized significant; SARS-CoV-2, current Corona virus; sig diff, significant difference.

The University of Minnesota has organized a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial (RCT) within a remarkably rapid timeframe, with initial posting at ClinicalTrials.gov on March 16, 2020, and active recruitment beginning on March 17, 2020 [3]. This is a single-center RCT with nation-wide recruitment. The primary outcome measures of this trial include the incidence of active COVID-19-related disease at 14 days post-enrollment, and a COVID-19 Disease Severity Scale self-reported by participants at 14 days post-enrollment: no COVID-19-related disease (score of 1); COVID-19-related disease with no hospitalization (score of 2); or COVID-19-related disease with hospitalization or death (score of 3). The goal is to enroll and randomize 1,500 subjects into each of the active-drug and placebo arms, followed by a 6-day treatment course with hydroxychloroquine. Secondary outcome measures include 14-day incidence of hospitalization, 14-day incidence of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, the number of participants in each arm who discontinue or withdraw from the protocol, and 90-day incidence of death related to COVID-19-related disease. The subjects included in this RCT will be healthcare workers or household contact who have been exposed to a COVID-19-related disease case within 3 days but have not yet developed symptoms (e.g., fever, cough, or shortness of breath). The trial includes a chartered Data Safety Monitoring Board with defined stopping rules for clinical futility or statistically significant improvement in the primary outcome measures comparing the active-drug group to the placebo group (personal communication, March 22, 2020: covid19faq COVID-1-Post-Exposure Prophylaxis FAQ Account). If there is demonstrable, significant clinical benefit of hydroxychloroquine, then the active drug could be offered to subjects who were originally randomized to the placebo group in an open-label extension study. Interim analysis at 14 days of the primary outcome measure is certainly feasible once the 3,000 subjects are enrolled and treated. Those results can then guide subsequent inquiries, which would then include 5-day treatment as an active comparator arm, rather than a placebo arm. For example, a 6-day prophylaxis period may not be sufficient for a healthcare worker who continues to be exposed to SARS-CoV-2. It is important for the lay public to understand that any well-designed clinical trial may well pose as many new hypotheses to be tested as were tested in the original trial design. Furthermore, the stage will be set for trials with novel retroviral therapies, or soluble ACE2 acting as a decoy receptor to reduce the cellular uptake of SARS-CoV-2 [4]. Careful and robust trial designs, exemplified by the University of Minnesota effort [3], are essential, even in the midst of an overwhelming pandemic.

Disclosure Statement

Dr. Warnock has not relevant conflict of interests.

Funding Sources

Support from the UAB/UCSD O'Brien Center (DK079337) is acknowledged.
  3 in total

1.  Soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: a potential approach for coronavirus infection therapy?

Authors:  Daniel Batlle; Jan Wysocki; Karla Satchell
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 6.124

Review 2.  Hydroxychloroquine: from malaria to autoimmunity.

Authors:  Ilan Ben-Zvi; Shaye Kivity; Pnina Langevitz; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 3.  Should COVID-19 Concern Nephrologists? Why and to What Extent? The Emerging Impasse of Angiotensin Blockade.

Authors:  Luca Perico; Ariela Benigni; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.847

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  A need for consensus on mortality reporting related to the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic in ongoing and future vascular registries and trials.

Authors:  Andrés Reyes Valdivia; Arindam Chaudhuri
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.860

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.