| Literature DB >> 32289108 |
Mark A Duffy1, Qi Chen1, Jianqiang Zhang1, Patrick G Halbur1, Tanja Opriessnig1,2.
Abstract
Experimental data suggest that the addition of spray-dried plasma (SDP) to pig feed may enhance antibody responses against certain pathogens and negatively impact virus survival. The benefit of SDP on Escherichia coli infection is well documented. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of bovine SDP (BovSDP) in the pig diet on acute porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) infection. A total of 16 3-wk-old conventional crossbred pigs were used and divided into three groups. Treatments included 1) a negative control group fed a commercial diet and sham inoculated with commercial liquid porcine plasma (n = 3), 2) a positive control group fed a commercial diet and inoculated with PEDV-spiked porcine plasma (PEDV; n = 8), and 3) a third group of pigs fed the commercial diet with inclusion of 5% spray-dried bovine plasma and inoculated with PEDV-spiked porcine plasma (BovSDP; n = 5). Although clinical signs associated with PEDV infection were mild in the BovSDP group, two of eight pigs in the PEDV group developed moderate clinical disease and had to be euthanized. The PEDV IgG and IgA antibody levels and prevalence rates were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the PEDV-BovSDP group compared with the PEDV group at 7 d postinoculation. The average fecal PEDV RNA shedding time was 7.2 ± 1.0 d for the PEDV-BovSDP group and 9.3 ± 1.1 d for the PEDV group with an overall time to clearance of PEDV shedding of 11 d for PEDV-BovSDP pigs and at least 14 d for PEDV pigs, which was not different (P = 0.215). The results indicate that addition of BovSDP induced an earlier anti-PEDV antibody response in pigs experimentally infected with PEDV thereby reducing clinical disease and the amount and duration of viral shedding during acute PEDV infection.Entities:
Keywords: bovine plasma; feed; pig model; porcine epidemic and diarrhea virus
Year: 2018 PMID: 32289108 PMCID: PMC7107225 DOI: 10.1093/tas/txy088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Anim Sci ISSN: 2573-2102
Experimental design and ADG presented as group mean ± SEM
| Group designations | Number of pigs per group | Percentage of BovSDP in the diet | Inoculation | ADG in grams |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEG | 3 | 0 | Saline | 224.5 ± 14.6 |
| PEDV | 8 | 0 | PEDV | 110.6 ± 40.0 |
| PEDV-BovSDP | 5 | 5 | PEDV | 128.4 ± 33.1 |
Figure 1.Experimental design. Blood was collected at arrival and dpi 0, 7, and 14, and rectal swabs were collected 6 d before challenge, on dpi 1 and daily thereafter. Rectal temperatures were taken every other day starting with 1 d before PEDV inoculation.
Ingredient composition of experimental diets
| Ingredients | Control (%) | BovSDP* diet (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Corn | 40.08 | 43.19 |
| SBM** 47% | 25.00 | 25.00 |
| Dried whey | 20.00 | 20.00 |
| Spray-dried bovine plasma | — | 5.00 |
| Soy protein concentrate† | 8.04 | — |
| Soybean oil | 3.66 | 3.57 |
| Limestone | 0.62 | 0.70 |
| Dicalcium phosphate, 18.5% | 1.70 | 1.69 |
| Salt | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Vitamin premix‡ | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Mineral premix|| | 0.15 | 0.15 |
|
| 0.24 | 0.20 |
|
| 0.10 | 0.13 |
|
| 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Calculated analysis | ||
| ME**, kcal/lb | 1,550 | 1,550 |
| CP**, % | 23.04 | 21.84 |
| Fat, % | 5.68 | 5.68 |
| Lactose, % | 14.00 | 14.00 |
| Sodium, % | 0.31 | 0.42 |
| Chloride, % | 0.44 | 0.49 |
| Calcium, % | 0.90 | 0.90 |
| Phosphorus, % | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Lysine, % | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Methionine, % | 0.48 | 0.48 |
| Methionine + cysteine, % | 0.90 | 0.94 |
| Tryptophan, % | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Threonine, % | 1.04 | 1.04 |
| Isoleucine, % | 1.16 | 1.09 |
*BovSDP, AP 920, APC Inc., Ankeny, IA.
†Soycomil P, ADM, Decatur, IL.
‡Premix provided the following per kilogram of complete diet: 11,025-IU vitamin A; 1,1033-IU vitamin D3; 44-IU vitamin E; 4.4-mg menadione (menadione sodium bisulfate); 8.3-mg riboflavin; 29-mg d-pantothenic acid; 50-mg niacin; 166-mg choline (choline chloride); and 33-ug vitamin b12.
||Premix provided the following per kilogram of complete diet: 12 mg Zn, 16 mg Cu, 0.3 mg I, and 0.3 mg Se.
**SBM indicates soybean meal, HCL indicates hydrochloride, ME indicates metabolizable energy, and CP indicates crude protein.
Figure 2.Mean group anti-PEDV IgA ELISA S/P ratios ± SEM at days 0, 7, and 14 after PEDV inoculation (dpi) in the different treatment groups and number of positive pigs/total number of pigs in the group for each day. The results of the two pigs that were killed on dpi 11 and 13 were included at dpi 14. An S/P ratio greater than 0.13 was considered positive. Different superscripts (A,B) indicate significantly different means at a given day. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise testing using the Tukey–Kramer adjustment if P < 0.05. The statistical software used was JMP Pro 11. The number of ELISA positive pigs per total number of pigs per group is listed next to each group mean.
Figure 3.Mean group anti-PEDV IgG ELISA S/P ratios ± SEM at days 0, 7, and 14 after PEDV inoculation in the different treatment groups and number of positive pigs per total number of pigs in the group for each day. The results of the two pigs that were killed on dpi 11 and 13 were included at dpi 14. An S/P ratio greater than 0.2 was considered positive. Different superscripts (A,B) indicate significantly different means at a given day. The number of ELISA positive pigs per total number of pigs per group is listed next to each group mean.
Figure 4.Mean group log10 amount of PEDV RNA fecal samples in PEDV and PEDV–BovSDP pigs at different days after PEDV infection and number of positive pigs per total number of pigs in the group for each day. An “A” on a given day indicates significant (P < 0.05) different group means. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise testing using the Tukey–Kramer adjustment if P < 0.05. The statistical software used was JMP Pro 11. 443.
Figure 5.Mean group log10 amount of PEDV RNA in PCR positive pigs in fecal samples at different days after PEDV infection. An “A” at a given day indicates significant (P < 0.05) different group means. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by pairwise testing using the Tukey–Kramer adjustment if P < 0.05. The statistical software used was JMP Pro 11.