Literature DB >> 32287572

Domestication and the behavior-genetic analysis of captive populations.

Jeffry P Ricker1,2,3,4, Linda A Skoog1,2,3,4, Jerry Hirsch1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Captive environments are believed to produce behavioral changes in animal populations that may limit our ability to generalize back to natural populations. These behavioral changes are thought to be associated with one or both of the following: (a) changes in frequencies of genes or gene complexes due to the effects of inbreeding or to changes in selection pressure; (b) changes in development of the phenotype due to the effects of changes in environmental variables. Inbreeding leads to increase in homozygosity, that may result in developmental anomalies because of a breakdown in developmental homeostasis. Changes in selection pressure may disrupt coadapted gene complexes that have evolved in the wild. Often, domestication is believed to result in individuals that are "degenerate"; i.e. inferior to individuals in the wild. However, this notion has received no empirical support. In fact, if phenotype changes do occur under domestication, these are usually quantitative, not qualitative, in nature. We suggest that the study of the domestication process may reveal evolutionary principles that would be difficult to discover in other ways, and the zoological parks may be ideal situations for such research.
Copyright © 1987 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 32287572      PMCID: PMC7133803          DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591(87)90257-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  16 in total

1.  BEHAVIOR GENETICS AND INDIVIDUALITY UNDERSTOOD.

Authors:  J HIRSCH
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sign of taxis as a property of the genotype.

Authors:  J HIRSCH; L ERLENMEYER-KIMLING
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-09-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Evolution and the theory of games.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1976 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.548

4.  A critique of Konrad Lorenz's theory of instinctive behavior.

Authors:  D S LEHRMAN
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1953-12       Impact factor: 4.875

5.  The human nature of human nature.

Authors:  L Eisenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-04-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Domestication.

Authors:  R Boice
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Why do inbred mice evolve so quickly?

Authors:  R Lewin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-06-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Inbreeding and juvenile mortality in small populations of ungulates.

Authors:  K Ralls; K Brugger; J Ballou
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Sexual imprinting and optimal outbreeding.

Authors:  P Bateson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  R C Lewontin; J L Hubby
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.