Literature DB >> 32287120

Autonomous Systems in Anesthesia: Where Do We Stand in 2020? A Narrative Review.

Cédrick Zaouter1, Alexandre Joosten2, Joseph Rinehart3, Michel M R F Struys4,5, Thomas M Hemmerling6.   

Abstract

As most of us are aware, almost every facet of our society is becoming, for better or worse, progressively more technology-dependent. Technological advancement has made autonomous systems, also known as robots, an integral part of our life in several fields, including medicine. The application of robots in anesthesia could be classified into 3 types of robots. The first ones are pharmacological robots. These robots are based on closed-loop systems that allow better-individualized anesthetic drug titration for optimal homeostasis during general anesthesia and sedation. Recent evidence also demonstrates that autonomous systems could control hemodynamic parameters proficiently outperforming manual control in the operating room. The second type of robot is mechanical. They enable automated motorized reproduction of tasks requiring high manual dexterity level. Such robots have been advocated to be more accurate than humans and, thus, could be safer for the patient. The third type is a cognitive robot also known as decision support system. This type of robot is able to recognize crucial clinical situation that requires human intervention. When these events occur, the system notifies the attending clinician, describes relevant related clinical observations, proposes pertinent therapeutic options and, when allowed by the attending clinician, may even administer treatment. It seems that cognitive robots could increase patients' safety. Robots in anesthesia offer not only the possibility to free the attending clinicians from repetitive tasks but can also reduce mental workload allowing them to focus on tasks that require human intelligence such as analytical and clinical approach, lifesaving decision-making capacity, and interpersonal interaction. Nevertheless, further studies have yet to be done to test the combination of these 3 types of robots to maintain simultaneously the homeostasis of multiple biological variables and to test the safety of such combination on a large-scale population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32287120     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

1.  A Century of Technology in Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Authors:  Jane S Moon; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence, nano-technology and genomic medicine: The future of anaesthesia.

Authors:  Shagufta Naaz; Adil Asghar
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-28

Review 3.  Intelligent automated drug administration and therapy: future of healthcare.

Authors:  Richa Sharma; Dhirendra Singh; Prerna Gaur; Deepak Joshi
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Intraoperative hypotension during liver transplant surgery is associated with postoperative acute kidney injury: a historical cohort study.

Authors:  Alexandre Joosten; Valerio Lucidi; Brigitte Ickx; Luc Van Obbergh; Desislava Germanova; Antoine Berna; Brenton Alexander; Olivier Desebbe; Francois-Martin Carrier; Daniel Cherqui; Rene Adam; Jacques Duranteau; Bernd Saugel; Jean-Louis Vincent; Joseph Rinehart; Philippe Van der Linden
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Development of a Novel Anesthesia Airway Management Robot.

Authors:  Xuesong Ma; Bo Pan; Tao Song; Yanwen Sun; Yili Fu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: A narrative review.

Authors:  Madhavi Singh; Gita Nath
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2022-01-04

Review 7.  Bayesian statistics in anesthesia practice: a tutorial for anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Michele Introna; Johannes P van den Berg; Douglas J Eleveld; Michel M R F Struys
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.931

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.