Meng-Qiao Huang1, Tuan-Jie Li1, Jian-Quan Liu1,2, Andrey Shatskiy2, Markus D Kärkäs2, Xiang-Shan Wang1. 1. School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Green Synthesis for Functional Materials, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China. 2. Department of Chemistry, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
A copper-catalyzed reaction between 2-bromo-benzothioamides and S8 or Se involving sulfur rearrangement is reported, enabling access to benzodithioles 2 and benzothiaselenoles 6 in the presence of Cs2CO3. In the absence of S8 or Se, the reaction affords dibenzodithiocines 7 via two consecutive C(sp2)-S Ullmann couplings.
A copper-catalyzed reaction betweenn class="Chemical">2-bromo-benzothioamides and S8 or Se involving sulfur rearrangement is reported, enabling access to benzodithioles 2 and benzothiaselenoles 6 in the presence ofCs2CO3. In the absence ofS8 or Se, the reaction affords dibenzodithiocines 7 via two consecutive C(sp2)-S Ullmann couplings.
Organosulfur
compounds display
prominent potential for diversefunctionalization and exhibit attractive
pharmacological properties.[1] In this regard,
copper-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions between aryl halides and
carbon- or heteroatom-based nucleophiles represent an established
synthetic strategy for forging carbon–carbon and carbon–heteroatom
bonds.[2] In recent years, elemental sulfur
(S8) has been demonstrated to be an effective sulfur source
for C(sp2)–S bond formation under copper-catalyzed
conditions. For example, Liu and coworkers disclosed a copper-catalyzed
three-component reaction involving o-iodobenzamides,
S8, and CH2Cl2 to afford 2,3-dihydrobenzothiazinones
in good yields (Figure ).[3] Similarly, the Shi group reported
a copper-mediated C–S bond-forming protocol to access benzoisothiazolonesfrom benzamides via C–H activation.[4] Recently, a solvent-free method for the synthesis of2-acylthieno[2,3-b]quinolines was described through dual copper/nitroxyl
radical catalysis.[5]
Figure 1
Copper-catalyzed approaches
to carbon–sulfur bond formation.
PIP = (pyridin-2-yl)isopropyl.
Copper-catalyzed approaches
to carbon–sulfur bond formation.
PIP = (pyridin-2-yl)isopropyl.In this regard, benzodithiols (n class="Chemical">BDTs) and derivatives thereof, which
contain a fused bicyclic molecule bearing a benzene ring connected
to a five-membered 1,2- or 1,3-dithiol-containing ring, have been
reported to possess promising bioactivity including anti-HBV,[6] antitumor,[7] antimicrobial,[8] anti-Mycobacterium avium,[9] and antibovine viral diarrhea virus activities.[10] Therefore, numerous methods have been explored
for accessing more potent and structurally diverseBDTs.[11−15] Here 3H-benzo[c][1,2]dithiol-3-ones
is an important member of1,2-BDTs and has, for example, been utilized
in the preparation offluorescent probes.[16]
In our recent study, 2-bromo-N-phenylbenzothioamide
(1a) was subjected to a terminal n class="Chemical">alkyne in the presence
of a copper catalyst to afford the corresponding 4H-thiochromen-4-imine.[17] We reasoned that
replacing the alkyne with S8 as a sulfur source would furnish
benzo[d]isothiazole-3(2H)-thione
through Caryl–Br thiolation. However, the reaction
underwent an unexpected sulfur rearrangement, leading to 3H-benzo[c][1,2]dithiol-3-imine. As a continuation
of our studies on construction of heterocycles catalyzed by copper(I)
or silver(I),[18] herein we disclose an efficient
and modular copper-catalyzed protocol for synthesis ofbenzodithiole
derivatives 2 through the reaction of2-bromo-benzothioamides 1 with S8 under alkaline conditions. Furthermore,
this copper-mediated reaction provided benzothiaselenole derivatives 6 when S8 was replaced with Se powder.
As
shown in Table , the
model reaction ofn class="Chemical">2-bromo-N-phenylbenzothioamide
(1a) and S8 was performed in refluxing pyridine
using 10 mol % CuI as a catalyst, affording 2a in 46%
yield (Table , entry
1). To improve the yield, several reaction parameters were varied,
including the copper source, base, ligand, and solvent. Using alternative
copper precursors, such as CuBr, CuCl, and CuOAc, demonstrated that
CuI was superior (cf. Table , entry 1 and entries 2–4). Furthermore, the use ofcopper(II) precursors, such as CuBr2 and Cu(OAc)2, led to no desired product formation (Table , entries 5 and 6). The addition offrequently
used ligands, such as Ph3P, o-phen, and l-proline, revealed that a substantial increase in yield was
possible when using o-phen, providing 2a in 68% yield (Table , entry 9). A survey of inorganic bases showed that Cs2CO3furnished product 2a in 76% yield (Table , entry 10). Other
carbonate bases, such as K2CO3, Na2CO3, and NaHCO3, also promoted the reaction
(Table , entries 11–13)
but provided lower yields of 2a compared with Cs2CO3. Finally, the reaction also proceeded in common
organic solvents, such as DMF, dioxane, DMSO, DMA, and toluene (Table , entries 14–20).
Here DMF was found to be the best solvent for this reaction, leading
to 2a in 85% yield (Table , entry 14).[19−21]
Reaction carried out with 1.0 mmol
NaHCO3 (100 mg, 1.2 mmol).
Reaction run with 5 mol % CuI (0.025
mmol).
Reaction run with
20 mol % CuI (0.1
mmol).
Reaction conditions: 1a (146 mg, 0.5 mmol), S8 (154 mg, 0.6 mmol), catalyst
(0.05
mmol), ligand (0.1 mmol), base (0.5 mmol), solvent (5.0 mL), 100 °C.Isolated yield.Reaction carried out with 1.0 mmol
NaHCO3 (100 mg, 1.2 mmol).Reaction run with 5 mol % CuI (0.025
mmol).Reaction run with
20 mol % CuI (0.1
mmol).With the optimized
reaction conditions in hand, we examined the
generality of the protocol (Scheme ). Initially, substrates with various substituents
on the n class="Chemical">imine nitrogen atom were investigated.
Scheme 1
Substrate Scope for
Synthesis of Benzodithiole 2
Reaction
conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), S8 (154 mg, 0.6
mmol), CuI (10 mg, 0.05 mmol), o-phen (18 mg, 0.1
mmol), Cs2CO3 (163
mg, 0.5 mmol), DMF (5.0 mL), 100 °C. Yields are of isolated products
after purification by column chromatography.
Reaction run on a 2.0 mmol scale.
Substrate Scope for
Synthesis of Benzodithiole 2
Reaction
conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), S8 (154 mg, 0.6
mmol), CuI (10 mg, 0.05 mmol), o-phen (18 mg, 0.1
mmol), Cs2CO3 (163
mg, 0.5 mmol), DMF (5.0 mL), 100 °C. Yields are of isolated products
after purification by column chromatography.Reaction run on a 2.0 mmol scale.In addition to aliphatic groups, the reaction tolerated
various
aromatic substituents bearing either electron-donating (methyl, methoxy,
iso-propyl) or electron-withdrawing substituents, such as nitro and
chloro, as well as heteroaryl motifs. All on class="Chemical">f these substrates underwent
the cascade coupling/cyclization smoothly to afford products 2a–q in good to excellent yields (62–90%, Scheme ). The structure
of product 2 was supported through single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis of 2l, as shown in Scheme .
With respect to the
substituents on the benzene ring, we were delighted
to n class="Chemical">find that various groups, such as methyl, methoxy, chloro, and
fluoro, at either the five- or seven-position could be employed, furnishing
the corresponding benzodithiole products 2r–ad in 75–91% yields (Scheme ). Additionally, a pyridine derivative was
also an effective coupling/cyclization partner, affording product 2ae in 91% yield.
To evaluate possible further applications
on class="Chemical">f the developed protocol,
several benzodithioles were transformed into their corresponding BDT
derivatives (3a–e) in high yields
via acidic hydrolysis (Scheme ). The developed protocol undoubtedly provides an efficient
and practical method for the preparation of these valuable and medicinally
relevant compounds. Furthermore, the synthetic conversion of 3a into the important compounds 4(22) (Beaucage’s reagent) and 5(23) was attained in good yield by reacting
with m-CPBA and hydrogen peroxide, respectively.
Next, we reasoned that the corresponding selenium analogue on class="Chemical">f 2 would be accessible by replacing the sulfur source with
an appropriate selenium source. Intriguingly, conducting the reaction
under the optimized reaction conditions using Se powder instead ofS8 provided (Z)-N-aryl-3H-benzo[d][1,2]thiaselenol-3-imines 6 rather than (Z)-N-aryl-3H-benzo[c][1,2]thiaselenol-3-imines. The
structure of product 6u was supported by X-ray diffraction
analysis. (See Scheme .) Gratifyingly, a variety of substituted aromatic motifs, such as
alkylphenyl (e.g., methyl, isopropyl, and tert-butyl),
alkoxyphenyl (e.g., methoxy and ethoxy), and mono- and dihalogenated
phenyl (e.g., F and Cl) reacted smoothly to give the desired products
under the optimized reaction conditions. A total of 30 benzothiaselenoles
were obtained in moderate to high yields (56–78%, Scheme ).
Scheme 2
Substrate Scope for
Synthesis of Benzothiaselenole 6
Reaction
conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), Se (48 mg, 0.6 mmol), CuI (10
mg, 0.05 mmol), o-phen (18 mg, 0.1 mmol), Cs2CO3 (163
mg, 0.5 mmol), DMF (5.0 mL), 100 °C. Yields are of isolated products
after purification by column chromatography.
Substrate Scope for
Synthesis of Benzothiaselenole 6
Reaction
conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), Se (48 mg, 0.6 mmol), CuI (10
mg, 0.05 mmol), o-phen (18 mg, 0.1 mmol), Cs2CO3 (163
mg, 0.5 mmol), DMF (5.0 mL), 100 °C. Yields are of isolated products
after purification by column chromatography.A proposed mechanism for the synthesis of 2 and 6 is detailed in Scheme . According to the structure of the products 2 and 6, benzothietane-2-imine B is envisioned as a key intermediate. Initially, benzothioamide 1 is believed to be converted to anion A in the
presence of a base. Then, benzothietane-2-imine B is
produced via an intramolecular copper-catalyzed Ullmann coupling reaction
to form thietane adduct B.[24] Subsequent cleavage of the C–S bond occurs to give the ring-opened
thiophenolate D. In the following step, intermediate D reacts with S8 or Se to form an S–S or
S–Se bond, which is similar to reacting Na2S with
S8 to form Na2S2. Finally, intermediate E undergoes an addition/elimination process to give the target
structure 2 or 6. An alternative mechanism
involves the initial formation of a copper thiolate adduct (G), which undergoes oxidative addition into the C–Br
bond to form the five-membered cupracycle H. The subsequent
migration and insertion ofsulfur or selenium into the Cu–S
or Cu–C bond of intermediate I affords the six-membered
metallacycle J or J′, respectively,
which upon reductive elimination delivers product 2 or 6 and regenerates the copper(I) catalyst.
Scheme 3
Proposed Reaction
Mechanism
Finally, conducting the reaction
under standard conditions but
in the abn class="Chemical">sence ofS8 or Se provided a new product, dibenzodithiocine 7a, derived from two consecutive C(sp2)–S
coupling reactions (Scheme ). The initial yield (42%) for this copper-catalyzed coupling
product could be improved to 79% upon changing the ligand and base
to PPh3 and K2CO3, respectively.
A total of 20 dibenzodithiocines (7a–o) were obtained in 72–85% yield, and the structure of 7n was supported by X-ray diffraction analysis (Scheme ).
Scheme 4
Synthesis of Dibenzodithiocine 7
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.5
mmol), CuI (10 mg, 0.05 mmol), PPh3 (26 mg, 0.1
mmol), K2CO3 (69 mg, 0.5 mmol), DMA (5.0 mL),
80 °C. Yields are of isolated products after purification by
column chromatography.
Synthesis of Dibenzodithiocine 7
Reaction conditions: 1 (0.5
mmol), CuI (10 mg, 0.05 mmol), PPh3 (26 mg, 0.1
mmol), K2CO3 (69 mg, 0.5 mmol), DMA (5.0 mL),
80 °C. Yields are of isolated products after purification by
column chromatography.In conclusion, an efn class="Chemical">ficient
and switchable copper-catalyzed method
for the synthesis ofbenzodithioles and benzothiaselenoles using S8 or Se as the chalcogen source is disclosed. Conducting the
reaction in the absence ofS8 or Se affords eight-membered dibenzodithiocine annulation
products via two consecutive C(sp2)–S coupling reactions.
Considering the importance ofsulfur and selenium compounds, this
protocol may be of great value for synthetic chemists and pharmacologists
in the future.