Literature DB >> 32285185

Pitfalls in the analysis of phytocannabinoids in cannabis inflorescence.

Cinzia Citti1,2,3, Fabiana Russo3, Salvatore Sgrò4, Alfonso Gallo5, Antonio Zanotto6, Flavio Forni3, Maria Angela Vandelli3, Aldo Laganà2,7, Carmela Maria Montone7, Giuseppe Gigli2, Giuseppe Cannazza8,9.   

Abstract

The chemical analysis of cannabis potency involves the qualitative and quantitative determination of the main phytocannabinoids: Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene (CBC), etc. Although it might appear as a trivial analysis, it is rather a tricky task. Phytocannabinoids are present mostly as carboxylated species at the aromatic ring of the resorcinyl moiety. Their decarboxylation caused by heat leads to a greater analytical variability due to both reaction kinetics and possible decomposition. Moreover, the instability of cannabinoids and the variability in the sample preparation, extraction, and analysis, as well as the presence of isomeric forms of cannabinoids, complicates the scenario. A critical evaluation of the different analytical methods proposed in the literature points out that each of them has inherent limitations. The present review outlines all the possible pitfalls that can be encountered during the analysis of these compounds and aims to be a valuable help for the analytical chemist. Graphical abstract.

Keywords:  Cannabinoid analysis; Cannabinoid extraction; Cannabis flos monograph; GC-FID; LC-UV; Mass spectrometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32285185     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-02554-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cannabinoid Formulations and Delivery Systems: Current and Future Options to Treat Pain.

Authors:  Barbara Stella; Francesca Baratta; Carlo Della Pepa; Silvia Arpicco; Daniela Gastaldi; Franco Dosio
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Acidic Cannabinoid Decarboxylation.

Authors:  Crist N Filer
Journal:  Cannabis Cannabinoid Res       Date:  2021-09-22

3.  Non-psychoactive cannabinoids identification by linear retention index approach applied to a hand-portable capillary liquid chromatography platform.

Authors:  Roberta La Tella; Francesca Rigano; Paolo Guarnaccia; Paola Dugo; Luigi Mondello
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.478

Review 4.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics of Phytocannabinoids from Non-Cannabis Plant Origins.

Authors:  Sarana Rose Sommano; Piyachat Sunanta; Noppol Leksawasdi; Kittisak Jantanasakulwong; Pornchai Rachtanapun; Phisit Seesuriyachan; Yuthana Phimolsiripol; Korawan Sringarm; Warintorn Ruksiriwanich; Pensak Jantrawut; Chuda Chittasupho
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Delta9-THC determination by the EU official method: evaluation of measurement uncertainty and compliance assessment of hemp samples.

Authors:  Salvatore Sgrò; Benedicta Lavezzi; Cristian Caprari; Marco Polito; Marcello D'Elia; Giampietro Lago; Giada Furlan; Stefano Girotti; Elida Nora Ferri
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.142

6.  Analysis of the California list of pesticides, mycotoxins, and cannabinoids in chocolate using liquid chromatography and low-pressure gas chromatography-based platforms.

Authors:  Nathaly Reyes-Garcés; Colton Myers
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.645

7.  Short communication: Tissue distribution of major cannabinoids following intraperitoneal injection in male rats.

Authors:  Cody A C Lust; Xinjie Lin; Erin M Rock; Cheryl L Limebeer; Linda A Parker; David W L Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.