Literature DB >> 32285103

The Predictive Capacity of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) Score in Burn Patients.

Katherine J Choi1,2,3, Christopher H Pham2, Zachary J Collier2, Melissa Mert4, Ryan K Ota3, Ruibei Li3, Haig A Yenikomshian2, Mandeep Singh1, T Justin Gillenwater2, Catherine M Kuza1.   

Abstract

Advances in burn care continues to improve survival rates and patient outcomes. There are several burn prognostic tools used to predict mortality and outcomes; however, none include patient comorbidities. We used the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score as a surrogate measure for comorbidities, and evaluated its role in predicting mortality and outcomes in adult burn patients undergoing surgery. A retrospective analysis was performed on data collected from a single burn center in the United States, which was comprised of 183 patients. We evaluated the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score as an independent predictor of mortality and outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, mechanical ventilator (MV) days, and complications. We compared the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score to other prognostic models which included the revised Baux score, Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury, and the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index. Our results demonstrated that the revised Baux and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores could be used to determine the mortality risk in adult burn patients. The revised Baux was the best predictor of mortality, ICU LOS, and MV days, while the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index was the best predictor of total LOS.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32285103      PMCID: PMC7333670          DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  18 in total

1.  Revised Baux Score and updated Charlson comorbidity index are independently associated with mortality in burns intensive care patients.

Authors:  Jacob S Heng; Olivia Clancy; Joanne Atkins; Jorge Leon-Villapalos; Andrew J Williams; Richard Keays; Michelle Hayes; Masao Takata; Isabel Jones; Marcela P Vizcaychipi
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Objective estimates of the probability of death in acute burn injury: a proposed Taiwan burn score.

Authors:  Chen-Chien Chen; Li-Ching Chen; Bor-Shyh Wen; Shih-Hao Liu; Hsu Ma
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  Can systemic inflammatory response syndrome score at admission predict clinical outcome in patients with severe burns?

Authors:  Guosheng Wu; Mingzhu Zhuang; Yong Jiang; Junhao Fan; Yifang Sun; Zhengyu Zhou; Zhaofan Xia; Yu Sun
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 2.744

4.  The abbreviated burn severity index.

Authors:  J Tobiasen; J M Hiebert; R F Edlich
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  The impact of risk factors and pre-existing conditions on the mortality of burn patients and the precision of predictive admission-scoring systems.

Authors:  G Germann; U Barthold; R Lefering; T Raff; B Hartmann
Journal:  Burns       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.744

6.  Comparison of six outcome prediction models in an adult burn population in a developing country.

Authors:  S H Salehi; K As'adi; A Abbaszadeh-Kasbi; M S Isfeedvajani; N Khodaei
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2017-03-31

7.  The measured effect magnitude of co-morbidities on burn injury mortality.

Authors:  Laquanda Knowlin; Lindsay Stanford; Danier Moore; Bruce Cairns; Anthony Charles
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.744

8.  Acute physiology, age, and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III score is an alternative efficient predictor of mortality in burn patients.

Authors:  Yohei Tanaka; Mikio Shimizu; Hidemitsu Hirabayashi
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Epidemiology and outcome analysis of burn patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit in a University Hospital.

Authors:  Luiz Fernando Tibery Queiroz; Elza H T Anami; Elisangela F Zampar; Marcos T Tanita; Lucienne T Q Cardoso; Cintia Magalhaes C Grion
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 2.744

10.  Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma: modelling effects of anatomic injury, acute physiology, age, and co-morbidity.

Authors:  J M Jones; N O Skaga; S Søvik; H M Lossius; T Eken
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prognosis value of revised Baux score among burn patients in developing country.

Authors:  Nguyen N Lam; Ngo T Hung; Ngo M Duc
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-06-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.