Literature DB >> 32284712

Gender disparity and implicit gender bias amongst doctors in intensive care medicine: A 'disease' we need to recognise and treat.

Andrew J Chadwick1, Rosaleen Baruah2.   

Abstract

UK medical schools have trained equal numbers of male and female doctors for almost 20 years. However, within intensive care medicine only 22% of consultants are female. This article uses the classic descriptors of a disease to explain how unconscious gender bias leads to gender disparity. It provides an introduction and summary of the literature explaining how unconscious biases are formed. It then shows how through overvaluing classically male, or agentic traits, intensive care medicine is at high risk of perpetuating gender disparity to the detriment of the whole speciality. Finally, it covers practical options on how to improve bias awareness and gender disparity nationally and locally within intensive care medicine. © The Intensive Care Society 2019.

Keywords:  Gender; ITU; gender bias; implicit bias; intensive care medicine

Year:  2019        PMID: 32284712      PMCID: PMC7137166          DOI: 10.1177/1751143719870469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc        ISSN: 1751-1437


  4 in total

1.  Gendered Expectations: the Impact of Gender, Evaluation Language, and Clinical Setting on Resident Trainee Assessment of Faculty Performance.

Authors:  Virginia Sheffield; Sarah Hartley; R Brent Stansfield; Megan Mack; Staci Blackburn; Valerie M Vaughn; Lauren Heidemann; Robert Chang; Jennifer Reilly Lukela
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Sex is a defining feature of neuroimaging phenotypes in major brain disorders.

Authors:  Lauren E Salminen; Meral A Tubi; Joanna Bright; Sophia I Thomopoulos; Alyssa Wieand; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Academic medicine's glass ceiling: Author's gender in top three medical research journals impacts probability of future publication success.

Authors:  John E Krstacic; Brendan M Carr; Ashutosh R Yaligar; Annet S Kuruvilla; Joshua S Helali; Jamie Saragossi; Chencan Zhu; Robert Hutnik; Mohammad Noubani; Jie Yang; Henry J Tannous; A Laurie W Shroyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Gender differences in response to medical red packets (Hongbao, monetary gifts): a questionnaire study on young doctors in China.

Authors:  Mengci Yuan; Hanhui Xu
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.834

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.