Literature DB >> 32283947

Cultivating DNA Sequencing Technology After the Human Genome Project.

Jeffery A Schloss1, Richard A Gibbs2, Vinod B Makhijani3, Andre Marziali4,5.   

Abstract

When the Human Genome Project was completed in 2003, automated Sanger DNA sequencing with fluorescent dye labels was the dominant technology. Several nascent alternative methods based on older ideas that had not been fully developed were the focus of technical researchers and companies. Funding agencies recognized the dynamic nature of technology development and that, beyond the Human Genome Project, there were growing opportunities to deploy DNA sequencing in biological research. Consequently, the National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health created a program-widely known as the Advanced Sequencing Technology Program-that stimulated all stages of development of new DNA sequencing methods, from innovation to advanced manufacturing and production testing, with the goal of reducing the cost of sequencing a human genome first to $100,000 and then to $1,000. The events of this period provide a powerful example of how judicious funding of academic and commercial partners can rapidly advance core technology developments that lead to profound advances across the scientific landscape.

Entities:  

Keywords:  $1,000 genome technology program; Advanced Sequencing Technology Program; National Human Genome Research Institute; National Institutes of Health; funding agency; funding model; nanopore DNA sequencing; next-generation DNA sequencing; peer review

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32283947     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-111919-082433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet        ISSN: 1527-8204            Impact factor:   8.929


  4 in total

Review 1.  Strategic vision for improving human health at The Forefront of Genomics.

Authors:  Eric D Green; Chris Gunter; Leslie G Biesecker; Valentina Di Francesco; Carla L Easter; Elise A Feingold; Adam L Felsenfeld; David J Kaufman; Elaine A Ostrander; William J Pavan; Adam M Phillippy; Anastasia L Wise; Jyoti Gupta Dayal; Britny J Kish; Allison Mandich; Christopher R Wellington; Kris A Wetterstrand; Sarah A Bates; Darryl Leja; Susan Vasquez; William A Gahl; Bettie J Graham; Daniel L Kastner; Paul Liu; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Benjamin D Solomon; Vence L Bonham; Lawrence C Brody; Carolyn M Hutter; Teri A Manolio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Utilizing museomics to trace the complex history and species boundaries in an avian-study system of conservation concern.

Authors:  Mozes P K Blom; Martin Irestedt; Mario Ernst; Knud A Jønsson; Per G P Ericson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.832

Review 3.  Epigenetic tumor heterogeneity in the era of single-cell profiling with nanopore sequencing.

Authors:  Yohannis Wondwosen Ahmed; Berhan Ababaw Alemu; Sisay Addisu Bekele; Solomon Tebeje Gizaw; Muluken Fekadie Zerihun; Endriyas Kelta Wabalo; Maria Degef Teklemariam; Tsehayneh Kelemu Mihrete; Endris Yibru Hanurry; Tensae Gebru Amogne; Assaye Desalegne Gebrehiwot; Tamirat Nida Berga; Ebsitu Abate Haile; Dessiet Oma Edo; Bizuwork Derebew Alemu
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 7.259

4.  Evaluation of vicinity-based hidden Markov models for genotype imputation.

Authors:  Su Wang; Miran Kim; Xiaoqian Jiang; Arif Ozgun Harmanci
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.307

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.