| Literature DB >> 32283740 |
Penggang Wang1,2, Maopeng Jiao1, Chunhong Hu3, Li Tian1,2, Tiejun Zhao1,2, Dongyi Lei1, Hua Fu1.
Abstract
Traditional cement-based repair materials are brittle and prone to cracking. The failure of more than half of repaired concrete structure is due to the re-cracking of the repair material itself or delamination and peeling from the concrete matrix. Thus, a second repair is required in a short period, increasing the maintenance cost. To reduce cracking, Strain Hardening Cement-based Composite (SHCC), with strain hardening and multiple cracking property, is prepared to study the influence of interface roughness and repair layer thickness on the shrinkage, cracking and delamination modes of SHCC-repaired concrete beams. The results show that under the shrinkage stress, multiple fine cracks instead of local fractures occur in the SHCC repair layer, and the interfacial delamination is effectively controlled. Interfacial bonding property is the main factor that affects the shrinkage and deformation coordination of SHCC-repaired beams. When the interface roughness is different, the crack width of the SHCC repair layer is similar. However, it has a greater influence on the interfacial delamination length and maximum delamination height of the repaired beam. With the increase of interface roughness, the delamination length and height of the repaired beam are greatly reduced. Therefore, before using SHCC to repair the existing structures or components, the bonding surface should be roughened to improve the bond strength between SHCC and the old concrete. With the increase of the repair layer thickness, the cracking and delamination of the repair layer tend to be alleviated. Although the crack width of the repair layer can be effectively controlled after cracking, the overlarge shrinkage (985.35 × 10-6, about twice the shrinkage value of ordinary concrete) of the SHCC prepared in this research results in the cracking of the repair layer and the delamination of the repair interface under the restraint of concrete; thus, SHCC fails to repair the concrete efficiently. In terms of shrinkage deformation control, materials with high toughness and low shrinkage are required to repair the existing concrete structures. The implication of this research may provide a theoretical basis for the preparation and application of SHCC with high toughness and low shrinkage.Entities:
Keywords: cracking; delamination; repair; shrinkage; strain hardening cement-based composite (SHCC)
Year: 2020 PMID: 32283740 PMCID: PMC7178713 DOI: 10.3390/ma13071757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Mix proportion of the old concrete (kg/m3).
| No. | Cement | Sand | Aggregate | Water |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concrete | 317 | 757 | 1136 | 190 |
Mix proportion of SHCC (kg/m3).
| No. | Cement | Fly Ash | Sand | Water | SP | PVA Fiber |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHCC | 555 | 680 | 490 | 420 | 27.8 | 26 |
Chemical composition of cement and fly ash (%).
| Material | CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | MgO | SO3 | Fe2O3 | K2O | TiO2 | MnO | Na2O | P2O5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | 57.27 | 20.60 | 7.17 | 4.70 | 4.43 | 3.85 | 0.77 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.17 | 0.13 |
| Fly ash | 1.83 | 58.10 | 31.79 | - | 0.51 | 3.76 | 1.51 | 1.57 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 0.20 |
Property of PVA fiber.
| Length (mm) | Diameter (μm) | Young’s Modulus (GPa) | Elongation (%) | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Density, (g/cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 39 | 42 | 7 | 1600 | 1.3 |
Figure 1Dumbbell specimen.
Figure 2Free shrinkage measurement of SHCC and concrete.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of SHCC-repaired concrete beam.
Number of SHCC-repaired concrete beams.
| Influencing Factors | No. | Interface Type/Average Depth of Sand Filling (mm) | Repair Layer Thickness (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interface roughness | SHCC-30-R1 | Natural smooth/0 | 30 |
| SHCC-30-R2 | Artificial chiseling/2.64 | 30 | |
| SHCC-30-R3 | Groove/3.5 | 30 | |
| Repair layer thickness | SHCC-20-R2 | Artificial chiseling/2.50 | 20 |
| SHCC-30-R2 | Artificial chiseling/2.64 | 30 | |
| SHCC-40-R2 | Artificial chiseling/2.27 | 40 | |
| SHCC-50-R2 | Artificial chiseling/2.59 | 50 |
Figure 4Bonding surface of old concrete after treatment.
Figure 5Schematic diagram of the sand filling method.
Figure 6Repaired concrete beam after pouring SHCC layer.
Figure 7Stress–strain curves of SHCC at different curing ages
Mechanical parameters of SHCC under uniaxial tension.
| Age (day) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.050 ± 0.028 | 0.0237 ± 0.00024 | 8.645 ± 0.064 | 2.945 ± 0.143 | 4.247 ± 0.370 |
| 14 | 2.893 ± 0.125 | 0.0242 ± 0.00076 | 11.945 ± 0.489 | 3.750 ± 0.057 | 4.336 ± 2.956 |
| 28 | 2.950 ± 0.166 | 0.0237 ± 0.00055 | 12.421 ± 0.956 | 3.824 ± 0.219 | 4.331 ± 0.306 |
| 90 | 3.073 ± 0.018 | 0.0223 ± 0.00106 | 13.795 ± 0.586 | 3.950 ± 0.291 | 3.545 ± 0.287 |
Figure 8Crack patterns of SHCC specimens under uniaxial tension at different ages.
Figure 9Drying shrinkage of SHCC and concrete.
Figure 10Restrained shrinkage stress and failure mode of SHCC-repaired beams.
Figure 11Typical crack formation and interfacial delamination patterns of SHCC-repaired concrete beam.
Crack formation and interfacial delamination of SHCC-repaired concrete beams.
| Influencing Factors | No. | Cracks of Repair Layer | Interfacial Delamination | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time of the First Crack | Number of Cracks | Crack Width | Delamination Position | Delamination Time (d) | Delamination Length (mm) | Delamination Height (mm) | ||||
| Number of Surface Cracks | Number of through Cracks | Average Crack Width (mm) | Maximum Crack Width (mm) | |||||||
| Interface roughness | SHCC-30-R1 | 8 | 11 | 0 | <0.04 | 0.04 | Left | 3 | 515 | 2.71 |
| SHCC-30-R2 | 9 | 5 | 1 | <0.04 | 0.05 | Left | 25 | 82 | 0.07 | |
| SHCC-30-R3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | <0.04 | 0.04 | Left | 28 | 29 | 0.08 | |
| Repair layer thickness | SHCC-20-R2 | 7 | 5 | 1 | <0.04 | 0.05 | Left | 19 | 28 | 0.05 |
| SHCC-30-R2 | 9 | 5 | 1 | <0.04 | 0.05 | Left | 25 | 82 | 0.07 | |
| SHCC-40-R2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | <0.04 | 0.04 | Left | 25 | 42 | 0.05 | |
| SHCC-50-R2 | 13 | 3 | 0 | <0.04 | 0.04 | Left | 32 | 66 | 0.05 | |
Figure 12Influence of interface roughness on cracking and interfacial delamination patterns of SHCC repaired beams (mm).
Figure 13Influence of repair layer thickness on cracking and interfacial delamination patterns of the repaired beams (mm).