| Literature DB >> 32283697 |
Foad Ghasemi1,2, Riccardo Frisenda3, Eduardo Flores4, Nikos Papadopoulos5, Robert Biele6,7, David Perez de Lara1, Herre S J van der Zant5, Kenji Watanabe8, Takashi Taniguchi8, Roberto D'Agosta6,9, Jose R Ares4, Carlos Sánchez4,10, Isabel J Ferrer4,10, Andres Castellanos-Gomez3.
Abstract
In two-dimensional materials research, oxidation is usually considered as a common source for the degradation of electronic and optoelectronic devices or even device failure. However, in some cases a controlled oxidation can open the possibility to widely tune the band structure of 2D materials. In particular, we demonstrate the controlled oxidation of titanium trisulfide (TiS3), a layered semicon-ductor that has attracted much attention recently thanks to its quasi-1D electronic and optoelectron-ic properties and its direct bandgap of 1.1 eV. Heating TiS3 in air above 300 °C gradually converts it into TiO2, a semiconductor with a wide bandgap of 3.2 eV with applications in photo-electrochemistry and catalysis. In this work, we investigate the controlled thermal oxidation of indi-vidual TiS3 nanoribbons and its influence on the optoelectronic properties of TiS3-based photodetec-tors. We observe a step-wise change in the cut-off wavelength from its pristine value ~1000 nm to 450 nm after subjecting the TiS3 devices to subsequent thermal treatment cycles. Ab-initio and many-body calculations confirm an increase in the bandgap of titanium oxysulfide (TiO2-xSx) when in-creasing the amount of oxygen and reducing the amount of sulfur.Entities:
Keywords: 2D materials; DFT GW; Raman spectroscopy; TiO2; TiS3; oxidation; photodetectors
Year: 2020 PMID: 32283697 PMCID: PMC7221968 DOI: 10.3390/nano10040711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) Photograph of titanium trisulfide (TiS3) powder onto a glass slide. (b) Photograph of the same powder of panel (a) after heating in air for 5 min at 350 °C. (c) Optical image of an individual TiS3 nanoribbon transferred onto a glass substrate, recorded in transmission illumination mode under the microscope. (d) Same as (c) after heating in air for 5 min at 350 °C. (e,f) Field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEGSEM) image of pristine TiS3 (e) and after heating at 400 °C in air (f). Note that the images in panel (e,f) correspond to different nanoribbons.
Figure 2(a) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of TiS3 during the heating under a flux of air of 90 mL/min at 10 °C/min, time dependence of the temperature (top) and time evolution of the loss of mass (bottom). (b) Ionic currents at different m/q ratios as a function of time during the TGA experiment. (c) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns before and after the heating treatment.
Figure 3(a) Raman spectra of a TiS3 nanoribbon onto a SiO2/Si substrate recorded in its pristine state (top) and during heating cycles at 320 °C. The spectra have been offset for clarity and each cycle corresponds to 2 min at 320 °C. (b) Intensity of the peaks at 142 cm−1 and 301 cm−1 as a function of heating cycle. The inset shows an optical picture of the pristine TiS3 nanoribbon onto SiO2/Si (left) and of the same nanoribbon after heat treatment (right). (c) Schematic of the boron-nitride/TiS3 stack (top) where 1 is not encapsulated and 2 is fully encapsulated. Optical picture of the sample after heating it at 450 °C for 30 min (bottom). We highlighted the contour of two boron nitride flakes (in red and blue) and of the nanoribbons (green) for clarity. (d) Raman spectra of the unencapsulated (1, top) and encapsulated (2, bottom) nanoribbons of panel (c) recorded before and after heating the sample.
Figure 4Band structure calculated with Density Functional Theory (DFT) along the first Brillouin zone for the different allo-tropes of the TiO2, (a) anatase, (b) V, (c) IV, and (d) rutile.
Figure 5(a) Bandgap calculated from DFT (red circles) and GW (green squares) for TiS3, TiO2 and intermediate phases composed of 50% TiS3 and 50% of TiO2 (indicated as Ti2S3O2). The lines are guides-to-the-eye. (b) FEGSEM image of a TiS3 nanoribbon heated up to 300 °C during 1 h. Spatially resolved electron diffraction measurements at the positions indicated by the red dots (right panel) reveal a higher oxygen concentration along the ribbon edges.
Figure 6(a) Schematic of a TiS3 photodetector (top). Optical microscope image of a TiS3 photodetector (bottom). (b) Current–voltage characteristics of the sample in its pristine state (top) and after oxidation of the nanoribbon (bottom). The black line is the current recorded with the device kept in dark while the purple line is under illumination at 405 nm. (c–f) Photocurrent as a function of time recorded while modulating the intensity of the incident light with a square wave on the pristine TiS3 photodetector (c,d) and on the TiO2 (e,f). The colors in (c,e) correspond to different incident wavelengths (375 nm, 405 nm, 420 nm, 530 nm, 605 nm, 660 nm) while the shades of purple in (d,f) correspond to different incident power densities from 0.02 W/cm2 to 1 W/cm2 at a fixed wavelength of 405 nm.
Figure 7(a) Responsivity of the device as a function of wavelength for different heating cycles. The pristine TiS3 device (top) was heated at 320 °C in steps of 2 min and after each step the responsivity at different wavelengths was extracted. The three bottom curves correspond to the oxidized TiO2 device. (b) Responsivity of the device at 405 nm as a function of incident power for the pristine device (top curve) and after consecutive heating cycles. (c) Responsivity cut-off wavelength (top) and responsivity–power exponent (bottom) as a function of the heating cycle.