Literature DB >> 32283494

How does ultrasonic cavitation remove dental bacterial biofilm?

N Vyas1, Q X Wang2, K A Manmi3, R L Sammons1, S A Kuehne1, A D Walmsley4.   

Abstract

Bacterial biofilm accumulation is problematic in many areas, leading to biofouling in the marine environment and the food industry, and infections in healthcare. Physical disruption of biofilms has become an important area of research. In dentistry, biofilm removal is essential to maintain health. The aim of this study is to observe biofilm disruption due to cavitation generated by a dental ultrasonic scaler (P5XS, Acteon) using a high speed camera and determine how this is achieved. Streptococcus sanguinis biofilm was grown on Thermanox™ coverslips (Nunc, USA) for 4 days. After fixing and staining with crystal violet, biofilm removal was imaged using a high speed camera (AX200, Photron). An ultrasonic scaler tip (tip 10P) was held 2 mm away from the biofilm and operated for 2 s. Bubble oscillations were observed from high speed image sequences and image analysis was used to track bubble motion and calculate changes in bubble radius and velocity on the surface. The results demonstrate that most of the biofilm disruption occurs through cavitation bubbles contacting the surface within 2 s, whether individually or in cavitation clouds. Cleaning occurs through shape oscillating microbubbles on the surface as well as through fluid flow. Crown
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32283494     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem        ISSN: 1350-4177            Impact factor:   7.491


  6 in total

Review 1.  Ways to control harmful biofilms: prevention, inhibition, and eradication.

Authors:  Wen Yin; Siyang Xu; Yiting Wang; Yuling Zhang; Shan-Ho Chou; Michael Y Galperin; Jin He
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 7.624

Review 2.  Biological and Physiochemical Methods of Biofilm Adhesion Resistance Control of Medical-Context Surface.

Authors:  Yuanzhe Li; Xiang Li; Yu Hao; Yang Liu; ZhiLi Dong; Kexin Li
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.580

3.  Microtensile bond strength to sealer-contaminated dentin after using different cleaning protocols.

Authors:  Hai-Ling Zang; Sheng-Nan Ai; Yu-Hong Liang
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.080

4.  Fusobacterium nucleatum Subspecies Differ in Biofilm Forming Ability in vitro.

Authors:  Maria Muchova; Dario L Balacco; Melissa M Grant; Iain L C Chapple; Sarah A Kuehne; Josefine Hirschfeld
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  Protein-conjugated microbubbles for the selective targeting of S. aureus biofilms.

Authors:  Jack A Caudwell; Jordan M Tinkler; Ben R G Johnson; Kenneth J McDowall; Fayez Alsulaimani; Christian Tiede; Darren C Tomlinson; Steven Freear; W Bruce Turnbull; Stephen D Evans; Jonathan A T Sandoe
Journal:  Biofilm       Date:  2022-03-19

Review 6.  The promising shadow of microbubble over medical sciences: from fighting wide scope of prevalence disease to cancer eradication.

Authors:  Ali Jangjou; Amir Hossein Meisami; Kazem Jamali; Mohammad Hadi Niakan; Milad Abbasi; Mostafa Shafiee; Majid Salehi; Ahmad Hosseinzadeh; Ali Mohammad Amani; Ahmad Vaez
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 8.410

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.