Ryan Palsma1, Nicholas Gravbrot1, Robert Bina1, Manas Agastya2, Willard S Kasoff3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA. 2. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA. Electronic address: wkasoff@neurosurgery.arizona.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hemophilia is generally considered a contraindication to deep brain stimulation (DBS) and other elective intracranial surgery because of the elevated risk of perioperative hemorrhage. Two prior case reports have suggested, however, that DBS may be safe in patients with hemophilia who undergo appropriate factor replacement. Here, we describe a third case of DBS surgery for medically refractory essential tremor (ET) in a patient with hemophilia A. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 68-year-old right-handed man with mild hemophilia A presented for a 10-year history of bilateral (right greater than left), medically refractory ET. The patient was considered an appropriate candidate for DBS by a multidisciplinary movement disorders conference, and hematology consultation was obtained. Baseline preoperative laboratory results showed a quantitative factor VIII (FVIII) level of 38%. Perioperative management consisted of daily intravenous bolus doses of recombinant FVIII from the morning of surgery to postoperative day 10. The patient underwent uncomplicated unilateral DBS placement in the left ventralis intermedius thalamus. Intra- and postoperative imaging showed no hemorrhage. His postoperative course was uncomplicated except for a single self-limited episode of hematuria requiring no intervention. CONCLUSIONS: DBS placement for ET may be safe in patients with coexisting hemophilia A if appropriate FVIII replacement is given, which may be delivered as bolus infusions rather than continuous infusion.
BACKGROUND:Hemophilia is generally considered a contraindication to deep brain stimulation (DBS) and other elective intracranial surgery because of the elevated risk of perioperative hemorrhage. Two prior case reports have suggested, however, that DBS may be safe in patients with hemophilia who undergo appropriate factor replacement. Here, we describe a third case of DBS surgery for medically refractory essential tremor (ET) in a patient with hemophilia A. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 68-year-old right-handed man with mild hemophilia A presented for a 10-year history of bilateral (right greater than left), medically refractory ET. The patient was considered an appropriate candidate for DBS by a multidisciplinary movement disorders conference, and hematology consultation was obtained. Baseline preoperative laboratory results showed a quantitative factor VIII (FVIII) level of 38%. Perioperative management consisted of daily intravenous bolus doses of recombinant FVIII from the morning of surgery to postoperative day 10. The patient underwent uncomplicated unilateral DBS placement in the left ventralis intermedius thalamus. Intra- and postoperative imaging showed no hemorrhage. His postoperative course was uncomplicated except for a single self-limited episode of hematuria requiring no intervention. CONCLUSIONS: DBS placement for ET may be safe in patients with coexisting hemophilia A if appropriate FVIII replacement is given, which may be delivered as bolus infusions rather than continuous infusion.
Authors: Florian Kocher; Andreas Seeber; Johannes Kerschbaumer; Stefan Schmidt; Dominik Wolf; Clemens Feistritzer Journal: Ther Adv Hematol Date: 2021-03-31