Literature DB >> 32282087

Quality and Readability Assessment of Websites on Human Papillomavirus and Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Hannah L Schwarzbach1, Leila J Mady2, Thomas M Kaffenberger2, Umamaheswar Duvvuri2, Noel Jabbour2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The incidence of human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer is rising, but public knowledge about this diagnosis remains low. This study aimed to investigate the quality and readability of online information about HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional website analysis.
METHODS: This study conducted a total of 12 web searches across Google, Yahoo, and Bing to identify websites related to HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer. The QUality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) was used to measure quality based on seven website criteria. The Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) were used to measure readability, with scores estimating the education level a reader would require to understand a piece of text. Readability improves as FRES increases and FKGL decreases.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven unique web pages were evaluated. The mean USA reading grade level as measured by FKGL was 10.42 (standard deviation = 1.54). There was an inverse relationship between quality and readability, with a significant positive correlation between QUEST score and FKGL (r = 0.343, P = .040) and a significant negative correlation between QUEST score and FRES (r = -0.537, P = .002).
CONCLUSIONS: With a mean USA reading grade level more than four grades above the American Medical Association's recommendation and results indicating that readability suffers as quality improves, these findings suggest that the currently available online information about HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer is insufficient. Improved patient education practices and resources about this diagnosis are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 131:87-94, 2021.
© 2020 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oropharyngeal cancer; consumer health information; human papillomavirus; patient education; quality; readability

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32282087     DOI: 10.1002/lary.28670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  4 in total

Review 1.  Availability and use of web-based interventions for patients with head and neck cancer: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rosemary Kelly; Peter Gordon; Ruth Thompson; Cherith Semple
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Readability of Online Materials Related to Vocal Cord Leukoplakia.

Authors:  Matthew Shneyderman; Grace E Snow; Ruth Davis; Simon Best; Lee M Akst
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-08-09

3.  Official Websites Providing Information on COVID-19 Vaccination: Readability and Content Analysis.

Authors:  Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Thomas Wochele-Thoma; Fabian Eibensteiner; Elisabeth Klager; Mojca Hribersek; Emil D Parvanov; Dalibor Hrg; Sabine Völkl-Kernstock; Maria Kletecka-Pulker; Eva Schaden; Harald Willschke; Atanas G Atanasov
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2022-03-15

4.  An evaluation of the quality of COVID-19 websites in terms of HON principles and using DISCERN tool.

Authors:  Reza Safdari; Marsa Gholamzadeh; Soheila Saeedi; Mozhgan Tanhapour; Sorayya Rezayi
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2022-08-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.