| Literature DB >> 32281920 |
Noelle Northcutt1,2, Stephan Papp3, Angela Keniston2, Areeba Kara4, Flora Kisuule5, Chiara Mandel6, Benji Mathews7, Amira Del Pino-Jones2, Dustin Smith8, Kevin Vuernick6, Marisha Burden2.
Abstract
Women continue to be underrepresented as speakers at national conferences, and research has shown similar trends in hospital medicine. The Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM) Annual Meeting has historically had an open call peer review process for workshop speakers and, in 2019, expanded the process for didactic speakers. We aimed to assess the overall conference trends for women speakers and whether the systematic processes in recruitment procedures (ie, open call) resulted in improved representation of women speakers. We also sought to understand how the proportion of women speakers might affect overall scores of the conference. From 2015 to 2019, the overall representation of women speakers increased, as did evaluation scores during the same time period. When selection processes included the open call peer review process, there were higher proportions of women speakers. An open call process with peer review for speakers may be a systematic process that national meetings could replicate to reduce gender inequities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32281920 DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hosp Med ISSN: 1553-5592 Impact factor: 2.960