Literature DB >> 32281483

A biomechanical comparison of conventional classifications of bowling action-types in junior fast bowlers.

Andrew Schaefer1, Rene E D Ferdinands2, Nicholas O'Dwyer2, Suzi Edwards3,4.   

Abstract

Fast bowling is categorised into four action types: side-on, front-on, semi-open and mixed; however, little biomechanical comparison exists between action types in junior fast bowlers. This study investigated whether there are significant differences between action-type mechanics in junior fast bowlers. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic analyses were completed on 60 junior male fast bowlers bowling a five-over spell. Mixed-design factorial analyses of variance were used to test for differences between action-type groups across the phases of the bowling action. One kinetic difference was observed between groups, with a higher vertical ground reaction force loading rate during the front-foot contact phase in mixed and front-on compared to semi-open bowlers; no other significant group differences in joint loading occurred. Significant kinematic differences were observed between the front-on, semi-open and mixed action types during the front-foot contact phase for the elbow and trunk. Significant kinematic differences were also present for the ankle, T12-L1, elbow, trunk and pelvis during the back-foot phase. Overall, most differences in action types for junior fast bowlers occurred during the back-foot contact phase, particularly trunk rotation and T12-L1 joint angles/ranges of motion, where after similar movement patterns were utilized across groups during the front-foot contact phase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cricket; action-types; biomechanics; fast bowling; kinematics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32281483     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1741972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  1 in total

1.  Validating an inertial measurement unit for cricket fast bowling: a first step in assessing the feasibility of diagnosing back injury risk in cricket fast bowlers during a tele-sport-and-exercise medicine consultation.

Authors:  Keegan Harnett; Brenda Plint; Ka Yan Chan; Benjamin Clark; Kevin Netto; Paul Davey; Sean Müller; Simon Rosalie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.