Literature DB >> 32280147

Will U.S. Forests Continue to Be a Carbon Sink?

Xiaohui Tian1, Brent Sohngen2, Justin Baker3, Sara Ohrel4, Allen A Fawcett4.   

Abstract

This paper develops structural dynamic methods to project future carbon fluxes in forests. These methods account for land management changes on both the intensive and extensive margins, both of which are critical components of future carbon fluxes. When implemented, the model suggests that U.S. forests remain a carbon sink through most of the coming century, sequestering 128 Tg C y-1. Constraining forestland to its current boundaries and constraining management to current levels reduce average sequestration by 25 to 28 Tg C y-1. An increase in demand leads to increased management and greater sequestration in forests. The results are robust to climate change. (JEL Q23, Q54).

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 32280147      PMCID: PMC7147820          DOI: 10.3368/le.94.1.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Land Econ        ISSN: 0023-7639


  6 in total

1.  Forest carbon management in the United States: 1600-2100.

Authors:  Richard Birdsey; Kurt Pregitzer; Alan Lucier
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 2.751

2.  Returning forests analyzed with the forest identity.

Authors:  Pekka E Kauppi; Jesse H Ausubel; Jingyun Fang; Alexander S Mather; Roger A Sedjo; Paul E Waggoner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Climate change. Fixing a critical climate accounting error.

Authors:  Timothy D Searchinger; Steven P Hamburg; Jerry Melillo; William Chameides; Petr Havlik; Daniel M Kammen; Gene E Likens; Ruben N Lubowski; Michael Obersteiner; Michael Oppenheimer; G Philip Robertson; William H Schlesinger; G David Tilman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.

Authors:  Yude Pan; Richard A Birdsey; Jingyun Fang; Richard Houghton; Pekka E Kauppi; Werner A Kurz; Oliver L Phillips; Anatoly Shvidenko; Simon L Lewis; Josep G Canadell; Philippe Ciais; Robert B Jackson; Stephen W Pacala; A David McGuire; Shilong Piao; Aapo Rautiainen; Stephen Sitch; Daniel Hayes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Complex forest dynamics indicate potential for slowing carbon accumulation in the southeastern United States.

Authors:  John W Coulston; David N Wear; James M Vose
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  From sink to source: Regional variation in U.S. forest carbon futures.

Authors:  David N Wear; John W Coulston
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Land-based measures to mitigate climate change: Potential and feasibility by country.

Authors:  Stephanie Roe; Charlotte Streck; Robert Beach; Jonah Busch; Melissa Chapman; Vassilis Daioglou; Andre Deppermann; Jonathan Doelman; Jeremy Emmet-Booth; Jens Engelmann; Oliver Fricko; Chad Frischmann; Jason Funk; Giacomo Grassi; Bronson Griscom; Petr Havlik; Steef Hanssen; Florian Humpenöder; David Landholm; Guy Lomax; Johannes Lehmann; Leah Mesnildrey; Gert-Jan Nabuurs; Alexander Popp; Charlotte Rivard; Jonathan Sanderman; Brent Sohngen; Pete Smith; Elke Stehfest; Dominic Woolf; Deborah Lawrence
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 13.211

2.  The Influence of Parametric Uncertainty on Projections of Forest Land Use, Carbon, and Markets.

Authors:  Brent Sohngen; Marwa E Salem; Justin S Baker; Michael J Shell; Sei Jin Kim
Journal:  J For Econ       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  The economic costs of planting, preserving, and managing the world's forests to mitigate climate change.

Authors:  K G Austin; J S Baker; B L Sohngen; C M Wade; A Daigneault; S B Ohrel; S Ragnauth; A Bean
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 14.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.