Julia Raifman1, Kristen Nocka2, Omar Galárraga3, Ira B Wilson3, Christina Crowley4, Jun Tao5, Siena Napoleon5, Theodore Marak4, Philip A Chan6. 1. Department of Health, Law, and Policy, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 2. Department of Health, Law, and Policy, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Electronic address: knocka@bu.edu. 3. Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI. 4. Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, RI. 5. Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI. 6. Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, RI; Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the form of daily emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) is effective for preventing HIV infection. Implementation has been limited by an inability to systematically evaluate uptake and use. All-Payer Claims Databases (APCDs) provide an opportunity to evaluate population-level PrEP implementation. METHODS: We used 2012-2017 data from Rhode Island's APCD and developed an algorithm to identify individuals prescribed FTC/TDF for PrEP. We describe PrEP implementation by patient demographics and provider type and mapped PrEP implementation across ZIP codes. We compared APCD data to electronic medical record data and comprehensive pharmaceutical claims data (AIDSVu.org). RESULTS: The Rhode Island APCD represented approximately 87% of the state's population. PrEP use increased 31-fold from 2012 to 2017. Users were predominantly privately insured, male, and concentrated in Providence County (76.6%). Infectious diseases providers had 3.2 times the odds of being a PrEP prescriber compared to primary care providers. Compared to other pharmaceutical and electronic medical record data, the APCD underestimated the number of PrEP users in Rhode Island but improved in capturing users over time. CONCLUSIONS: APCDs are a useful data source for characterizing PrEP use across a state. There is a need to increase PrEP prescribing among primary care providers, especially in areas with underserved populations.
PURPOSE: Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the form of daily emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) is effective for preventing HIV infection. Implementation has been limited by an inability to systematically evaluate uptake and use. All-Payer Claims Databases (APCDs) provide an opportunity to evaluate population-level PrEP implementation. METHODS: We used 2012-2017 data from Rhode Island's APCD and developed an algorithm to identify individuals prescribed FTC/TDF for PrEP. We describe PrEP implementation by patient demographics and provider type and mapped PrEP implementation across ZIP codes. We compared APCD data to electronic medical record data and comprehensive pharmaceutical claims data (AIDSVu.org). RESULTS: The Rhode Island APCD represented approximately 87% of the state's population. PrEP use increased 31-fold from 2012 to 2017. Users were predominantly privately insured, male, and concentrated in Providence County (76.6%). Infectious diseases providers had 3.2 times the odds of being a PrEP prescriber compared to primary care providers. Compared to other pharmaceutical and electronic medical record data, the APCD underestimated the number of PrEP users in Rhode Island but improved in capturing users over time. CONCLUSIONS: APCDs are a useful data source for characterizing PrEP use across a state. There is a need to increase PrEP prescribing among primary care providers, especially in areas with underserved populations.
Authors: Robert M Grant; Javier R Lama; Peter L Anderson; Vanessa McMahan; Albert Y Liu; Lorena Vargas; Pedro Goicochea; Martín Casapía; Juan Vicente Guanira-Carranza; Maria E Ramirez-Cardich; Orlando Montoya-Herrera; Telmo Fernández; Valdilea G Veloso; Susan P Buchbinder; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Mauro Schechter; Linda-Gail Bekker; Kenneth H Mayer; Esper Georges Kallás; K Rivet Amico; Kathleen Mulligan; Lane R Bushman; Robert J Hance; Carmela Ganoza; Patricia Defechereux; Brian Postle; Furong Wang; J Jeff McConnell; Jia-Hua Zheng; Jeanny Lee; James F Rooney; Howard S Jaffe; Ana I Martinez; David N Burns; David V Glidden Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sarah H Gordon; Benjamin D Sommers; Ira Wilson; Omar Galarraga; Amal N Trivedi Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Hsiu Wu; Maria C B Mendoza; Ya-Lin A Huang; Tameka Hayes; Dawn K Smith; Karen W Hoover Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Aaron J Siegler; Farah Mouhanna; Robertino Mera Giler; Kevin Weiss; Elizabeth Pembleton; Jodie Guest; Jeb Jones; Amanda Castel; Howa Yeung; Michael Kramer; Scott McCallister; Patrick S Sullivan Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Catherine E Oldenburg; Amaya G Perez-Brumer; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Douglas Krakower; David S Novak; Matthew J Mimiaga; Kenneth H Mayer Journal: AIDS Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Helen L King; Samuel B Keller; Michael A Giancola; David A Rodriguez; Jasmine J Chau; Jason A Young; Susan J Little; Davey M Smith Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-09
Authors: Kristen Nocka; Madeline C Montgomery; Ana Progovac; Carly E Guss; Philip A Chan; Julia Raifman Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Lorraine T Dean; Hsien-Yen Chang; William C Goedel; Philip A Chan; Jalpa A Doshi; Amy S Nunn Journal: AIDS Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 4.177