Literature DB >> 32279108

Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients.

Yavuz Guler1, Akif Erbin2, Alper Kafkasli3, Gokhun Ozmerdiven4.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the factors predicting success for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in adult patients. Between January 2014 and December 2018, 480 adult patients in total underwent SWL and data were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with multiple ureteral stones, solitary kidney, congenital abnormality, skeletal system abnormality, history of previous urinary system surgery and SWL, renal insufficiency, patients who could not tolerate SWL and pediatric patients were excluded from the study. The remaining 415 patients were divided into two groups as success (Group 1, n = 307) and failure (Group 2, n = 108). The overall success rate was 73.9%. The values of stone size, Hounsfield Unit (HU), skin to stone distance (SSD), ureteral wall thickness (UWT), proximal ureter diameter, renal pelvis diameter, hydronephrosis grade, and duration of renal colic were significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1. In binary logistic regression analyses, HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter were found to be independent predictors. HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter had sensitivity and specificity of 92-92%, 88-23%, and 87-46%, with cutoff values of 740 HU, 2.5 mm and 8.5 mm, respectively. The area under the curve values were 0.96, 0.97, and 0.96 for HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter, respectively. The CT-based parameters, including HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter are independent predictive factors with excellent accuracy for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with SWL in adult patients. Based on these factors, SWL can be considered for proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy; Hounsfield Unit; Proximal ureter diameter; Ureteral wall thickness

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32279108     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01186-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  1 in total

1.  The Efficacy of Early Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones.

Authors:  Chang Hee Kim; Dong Seong Shin; Tae Beom Kim; Han Jung
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 1.510

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Predicting narrow ureters before ureteroscopic lithotripsy with a neural network: a retrospective bicenter study.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Dawei Wang; Yong Wang; Shoutong Wang; Yi Shao; Jun Lu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.861

2.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for impacted upper ureteral stone in a patient with advanced lumbar scoliosis and lower-extremity development defect: a case report.

Authors:  Yavuz Güler
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  The utility of automated volume analysis of renal stones before and after shockwave lithotripsy treatment.

Authors:  Helen Wei Cui; Tze Khiang Tan; Frederikke Eichner Christiansen; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther; Benjamin William Turney
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.436

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.