Hanna J Tadros1, Chelsea S Life2, Gustavo Garcia2, Elisa Pirozzi3, Edward G Jones4, Susmita Datta5, Michelle S Parvatiyar6, P Bryant Chase7, Hugh D Allen8, Jeffrey J Kim8, Jose R Pinto2, Andrew P Landstrom9. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States; Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. 2. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, United States. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States. 5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. 6. Department of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States. 7. Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States. 8. Department of Pediatrics, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States. 9. Department of Pediatrics, Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: andrew.landstrom@duke.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Troponin (TNN)-encoded cardiac troponins (Tn) are critical for sensing calcium and triggering myofilament contraction. TNN variants are associated with development of cardiomyopathy; however, recent advances in genetic analysis have identified rare population variants. It is unclear how certain variants are associated with disease while others are tolerated. OBJECTIVE: To compare probands with TNNT2, TNNI3, and TNNC1 variants and utilize high-resolution variant comparison mapping of pathologic and rare population variants to identify loci associated with disease pathogenesis. METHODS: Cardiomyopathy-associated TNN variants were identified in the literature and topology mapping conducted. Clinical features were compiled and compared. Rare population variants were obtained from the gnomAD database. Signal-to-noise (S:N) normalized pathologic variant frequency against population variant frequency. Abstract review of clinical phenotypes was applied to "significant" hot spots. RESULTS: Probands were compiled (N = 70 studies, 224 probands) as were rare variants (N = 125,748 exomes; 15,708 genomes, MAF <0.001). TNNC1-positive probands demonstrated the youngest age of presentation (20.0 years; P = .016 vs TNNT2; P = .004 vs TNNI3) and the highest death, transplant, or ventricular fibrillation events (P = .093 vs TNNT2; P = .024 vs TNNI3; Kaplan Meir: P = .025). S:N analysis yielded hot spots of diagnostic significance within the tropomyosin-binding domains, α-helix 1, and the N-Terminus in TNNT2 with increased sudden cardiac death and ventricular fibrillation (P = .004). The inhibitory region and C-terminal region in TNNI3 exhibited increased restrictive cardiomyopathy (P =.008). HCM and RCM models tended to have increased calcium sensitivity and DCM decreased sensitivity (P < .001). DCM and HCM studies typically showed no differences in Hill coefficient which was decreased in RCM models (P < .001). CM models typically demonstrated no changes to Fmax (P = .239). CONCLUSION: TNNC1-positive probands had younger ages of diagnosis and poorer clinical outcomes. Mapping of TNN variants identified locations in TNNT2 and TNNI3 associated with heightened pathogenicity, RCM diagnosis, and increased risk of sudden death.
INTRODUCTION: Troponin (TNN)-encoded cardiac troponins (Tn) are critical for sensing calcium and triggering myofilament contraction. TNN variants are associated with development of cardiomyopathy; however, recent advances in genetic analysis have identified rare population variants. It is unclear how certain variants are associated with disease while others are tolerated. OBJECTIVE: To compare probands with TNNT2, TNNI3, and TNNC1 variants and utilize high-resolution variant comparison mapping of pathologic and rare population variants to identify loci associated with disease pathogenesis. METHODS:Cardiomyopathy-associated TNN variants were identified in the literature and topology mapping conducted. Clinical features were compiled and compared. Rare population variants were obtained from the gnomAD database. Signal-to-noise (S:N) normalized pathologic variant frequency against population variant frequency. Abstract review of clinical phenotypes was applied to "significant" hot spots. RESULTS: Probands were compiled (N = 70 studies, 224 probands) as were rare variants (N = 125,748 exomes; 15,708 genomes, MAF <0.001). TNNC1-positive probands demonstrated the youngest age of presentation (20.0 years; P = .016 vs TNNT2; P = .004 vs TNNI3) and the highest death, transplant, or ventricular fibrillation events (P = .093 vs TNNT2; P = .024 vs TNNI3; Kaplan Meir: P = .025). S:N analysis yielded hot spots of diagnostic significance within the tropomyosin-binding domains, α-helix 1, and the N-Terminus in TNNT2 with increased sudden cardiac death and ventricular fibrillation (P = .004). The inhibitory region and C-terminal region in TNNI3 exhibited increased restrictive cardiomyopathy (P =.008). HCM and RCM models tended to have increased calcium sensitivity and DCM decreased sensitivity (P < .001). DCM and HCM studies typically showed no differences in Hill coefficient which was decreased in RCM models (P < .001). CM models typically demonstrated no changes to Fmax (P = .239). CONCLUSION:TNNC1-positive probands had younger ages of diagnosis and poorer clinical outcomes. Mapping of TNN variants identified locations in TNNT2 and TNNI3 associated with heightened pathogenicity, RCM diagnosis, and increased risk of sudden death.
Authors: Andrew P Landstrom; Ernesto Fernandez; Jill A Rosenfeld; Yaping Yang; Andrew L Dailey-Schwartz; Christina Y Miyake; Hugh D Allen; Daniel J Penny; Jeffrey J Kim Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Sara L Van Driest; Vlad C Vasile; Steve R Ommen; Melissa L Will; A Jamil Tajik; Bernard J Gersh; Michael J Ackerman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-11-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Peter D Stenson; Edward V Ball; Matthew Mort; Andrew D Phillips; Jacqueline A Shiel; Nick S T Thomas; Shaun Abeysinghe; Michael Krawczak; David N Cooper Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Bin Xu; J Louw Roos; Shawn Levy; E J van Rensburg; Joseph A Gogos; Maria Karayiorgou Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-05-30 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Daniel R Zerbino; Premanand Achuthan; Wasiu Akanni; M Ridwan Amode; Daniel Barrell; Jyothish Bhai; Konstantinos Billis; Carla Cummins; Astrid Gall; Carlos García Girón; Laurent Gil; Leo Gordon; Leanne Haggerty; Erin Haskell; Thibaut Hourlier; Osagie G Izuogu; Sophie H Janacek; Thomas Juettemann; Jimmy Kiang To; Matthew R Laird; Ilias Lavidas; Zhicheng Liu; Jane E Loveland; Thomas Maurel; William McLaren; Benjamin Moore; Jonathan Mudge; Daniel N Murphy; Victoria Newman; Michael Nuhn; Denye Ogeh; Chuang Kee Ong; Anne Parker; Mateus Patricio; Harpreet Singh Riat; Helen Schuilenburg; Dan Sheppard; Helen Sparrow; Kieron Taylor; Anja Thormann; Alessandro Vullo; Brandon Walts; Amonida Zadissa; Adam Frankish; Sarah E Hunt; Myrto Kostadima; Nicholas Langridge; Fergal J Martin; Matthieu Muffato; Emily Perry; Magali Ruffier; Dan M Staines; Stephen J Trevanion; Bronwen L Aken; Fiona Cunningham; Andrew Yates; Paul Flicek Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Carolyn Y Ho; Sharlene M Day; Euan A Ashley; Michelle Michels; Alexandre C Pereira; Daniel Jacoby; Allison L Cirino; Jonathan C Fox; Neal K Lakdawala; James S Ware; Colleen A Caleshu; Adam S Helms; Steven D Colan; Francesca Girolami; Franco Cecchi; Christine E Seidman; Gautam Sajeev; James Signorovitch; Eric M Green; Iacopo Olivotto Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sanam Shafaattalab; Alison Y Li; Marvin G Gunawan; BaRun Kim; Farah Jayousi; Yasaman Maaref; Zhen Song; James N Weiss; R John Solaro; Zhilin Qu; Glen F Tibbits Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2021-12-17
Authors: Lucas K Keyt; Jason M Duran; Quan M Bui; Chao Chen; Michael I Miyamoto; Jorge Silva Enciso; Jil C Tardiff; Eric D Adler Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-09-07
Authors: Yun Shi; Julia P Bethea; Hannah L Hetzel-Ebben; Maicon Landim-Vieira; Ross J Mayper; Regan L Williams; Lauren E Kessler; Amanda M Ruiz; Kathryn Gargiulo; Jennifer S M Rose; Grayson Platt; Jose R Pinto; Brian K Washburn; P Bryant Chase Journal: J Muscle Res Cell Motil Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 2.698
Authors: Tyler R Reinoso; Maicon Landim-Vieira; Yun Shi; Jamie R Johnston; P Bryant Chase; Michelle S Parvatiyar; Andrew P Landstrom; Jose R Pinto; Hanna J Tadros Journal: J Muscle Res Cell Motil Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 3.352