Chang Hu1, Feng Tang1, Qingyu Wu2, Baohua Guo3, Whitney Annie Long4, Yingmao Ruan5, Lei Li6. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, The First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. 4. School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. 5. Department of Pathology, The First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. 6. Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: lilei@lilei.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pericardial adhesion formation is a prominent cause of morbidity and death in cardiovascular surgery, but there is still no ideal prevention method, especially in redo cases. This study investigated a novel antiadhesion trilaminar polymeric film compared with the Gore PRECLUDE Pericardial Membrane (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) and a negative control. METHODS: Our novel trilaminar membrane is composed of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). An established pericardial adhesion rabbit model was used to test the property of the membrane. After sternotomy, a portion of pericardium was resected and the epicardium was abraded. Rabbits (n = 24) were randomly assigned to 3 groups: control group, no trilaminar membrane or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE); ePTFE group, or trilaminar membrane group (PVA-CMC group). Evaluation of adhesion formation was performed by resternotomy 4 weeks after the operation. RESULTS: The degree of tissue adhesion surrounding the heart in the PVA-CMC group was significantly less than in the control (P < .01) and ePTFE (P < .05) groups. The inflammation score in group PVA-CMC was significantly lower than that in the ePTFE (P < .01) and control (P < .01) groups. The fibrosis score was significantly lower in group PVA-CMC than that in the ePTFE (P < .05) and control (P < .01) groups. CONCLUSIONS: The novel trilaminar membrane effectively reduced postoperative pericardial adhesions. The placement of the trilaminar membrane at the time of sternal closure provides a novel combination to minimize the extent and severity of pericardial adhesions while providing a physical barrier between the sternum and the cardiac structures.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pericardial adhesion formation is a prominent cause of morbidity and death in cardiovascular surgery, but there is still no ideal prevention method, especially in redo cases. This study investigated a novel antiadhesion trilaminar polymeric film compared with the Gore PRECLUDE Pericardial Membrane (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) and a negative control. METHODS: Our novel trilaminar membrane is composed of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). An established pericardial adhesion rabbit model was used to test the property of the membrane. After sternotomy, a portion of pericardium was resected and the epicardium was abraded. Rabbits (n = 24) were randomly assigned to 3 groups: control group, no trilaminar membrane or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE); ePTFE group, or trilaminar membrane group (PVA-CMC group). Evaluation of adhesion formation was performed by resternotomy 4 weeks after the operation. RESULTS: The degree of tissue adhesion surrounding the heart in the PVA-CMC group was significantly less than in the control (P < .01) and ePTFE (P < .05) groups. The inflammation score in group PVA-CMC was significantly lower than that in the ePTFE (P < .01) and control (P < .01) groups. The fibrosis score was significantly lower in group PVA-CMC than that in the ePTFE (P < .05) and control (P < .01) groups. CONCLUSIONS: The novel trilaminar membrane effectively reduced postoperative pericardial adhesions. The placement of the trilaminar membrane at the time of sternal closure provides a novel combination to minimize the extent and severity of pericardial adhesions while providing a physical barrier between the sternum and the cardiac structures.
Authors: A A Bakibaev; V P Tuguldurova; M V Lyapunova; V V Ivanov; O A Kaidash; E V Udut; M V Bukterov; E E Buyko; A S Kasyanova; V S Malkov Journal: Sovrem Tekhnologii Med Date: 2021-02-28