| Literature DB >> 32278669 |
Sarvesh Kumar Singh1, Preeti Swami2, Kshipra Rajoria3.
Abstract
An open label, randomized, comparative, interventional pilot study was done to assess the effect of Lekhana Basti (medicated enema) and Rechana Nasya Karma (Errhine therapy) in the management of Sthoulya with special reference to obesity. In the study 30 clinically diagnosed patient of either sex were randomly divided into two groups. In Basti group, Lekhana Basti in Karma Basti manner was given for 30 days. Anuvasana Basti (enema with Triphaladi Taila) in the dose of 120 mL and Asthapana Basti (enema with Triphaladi decoction etc.) in the dose of approximately 960 mL was given. In Nasya group, Rechananasya on alternate days was given with Triphaladi (oil) in the dose of 0.5 mL per nostril for total 28 days. The patients were assessed on objective criteria such as such as weight, chest circumference, mid-arm circumference, mid-thigh circumference, triceps skin fold thickness, sub-scapular skin fold thickness, abdominal skin fold thickness, waist-hip ratio and lipid profile. It was observed that Basti group was a better intervention in providing relief, however there intergroup standard deviation was low on most of the variable expect the lipid profile. The results suggest that the Nasya Karma may be developed as a better practical approach in obesity management.Entities:
Keywords: Ayurveda; Lekhana Basti; Obesity; Rechana Nasya; Sthoulya
Year: 2020 PMID: 32278669 PMCID: PMC7329708 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2020.02.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Details of Trial interventions.
| Intervention | ||
|---|---|---|
| Karma Basti | Rechana nasya | |
| Place of administration | The | The |
| Dosage regimen and quantitative description | ||
| Drugs | ||
| Method of preparation of | ||
| Characteristics of the | The | |
| The patient is made to lie in left lateral posture with right leg semiflexed and bend towards the surface. | ||
| After |
Comparative analysis of both (Basti and Nasya) interventions.
| Variables | SDa | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | After treatment | Mean change (mean ± SD) | Baseline | After treatment | Mean change (mean ± SD) | ||
| Weight | 86.86 | 83.00 | 3.867 ± 1.356 | 79.46 | 78.66 | 0.800 ± 0.861 | 0.8619 |
| Chest circumference | 109.5 | 106.3 | 3.200 ± 1.821 | 0.703 | 0.703 | 0.703 ± 0.703 | 0.1817 |
| Mid-arm circumference | 35.00 | 33.13 | 1.867 ± 1.506 | 33.80 | 32.20 | 1.600 ± 1.183 | 1.183 |
| Triceps SFT | 3.187 | 2.713 | 0.473 ± 0.2815 | 3.200 | 2.620 | 0.580 ± 0.497 | 0.2898 |
| Sub scapular SFT | 3.560 | 2.807 | 0.753 ± 0.4307 | 3.260 | 3.047 | 0.213 ± 0.331 | 0.3314 |
| Abdominal SFT | 3.893 | 2.867 | 1.027 ± 0.7015 | 3.273 | 2.900 | 0.373 ± 0.489 | 0.4873 |
| Mid-thigh circumference | 61.26 | 58.13 | 3.133 ± 2.997 | 57.86 | 57.06 | 0.800 ± 1.082 | 1.082 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.872 | 0.832 | 0.040 ± 0.0397 | 0.821 | 0.809 | 0.012 ± 0.023 | 0.0236 |
| HDL | 48.33 | 47.727 | 0.6067 ± 3.274 | 47.60 | 45.707 | 1.893 ± 5.071 | 6.0 |
| LDL | 103.0 | 93.600 | 9.467 ± 26.478 | 110.5 | 103.85 | 6.680 ± 29.673 | 39.70 |
| VLDL | 31.17 | 30.124 | 1.049 ± 7.075 | 32.17 | 27.573 | 4.600 ± 13.468 | 15.0 |
| Serum cholesterol | 182.6 | 168.57 | 140.32 ± 31.263 | 187.1 | 182.60 | 4.533 ± 38.084 | 49.14 |
| Serum triglyceride | 156.0 | 150.83 | 5.165 ± 35.606 | 160.2 | 152.67 | 7.533 ± 54.273 | 64.8 |
SFT – Skin fold thickness; HDL – High density Lipoprotein; LDL - Low density Lipoprotein; VLDL – Very low density Lipoprotein; SD - Standard deviation from paired t test; SDa - Standard deviation of Inter group comparison.