Literature DB >> 32278094

Cerebrovascular reactivity mapping using intermittent breath modulation.

Peiying Liu1, Cuimei Xu2, Zixuan Lin3, Sandeepa Sur2, Yang Li2, Sevil Yasar4, Paul Rosenberg5, Marilyn Albert6, Hanzhang Lu7.   

Abstract

Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), an index of brain vessel's dilatory capacity, is typically measured using hypercapnic gas inhalation or breath-holding as a vasoactive challenge. However, these methods require considerable subject cooperation and could be challenging in clinical studies. More recently, there have been attempts to use resting-state BOLD data to map CVR by utilizing spontaneous changes in breathing pattern. However, in subjects who have small fluctuations in their spontaneous breathing pattern, the CVR results could be noisy and unreliable. In this study, we aim to develop a new method for CVR mapping that does not require gas-inhalation yet provides substantially higher sensitivity than resting-state CVR mapping. This new method is largely based on resting-state scan, but introduces intermittent modulation of breathing pattern in the subject to enhance fluctuations in their end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) level. Here we examined the comfort level, sensitivity, and accuracy of this method in two studies. First, in 8 healthy young subjects, we developed the intermittent breath-modulation method using two different modulation frequencies, 6 ​s per breath and 12 ​s per breath, respectively, and compared the results to three existing CVR methods, specifically hypercapnic gas inhalation, breath-holding, and resting-state. Our results showed that the comfort level of the 6-s breath-modulation method was significantly higher than breath-holding (p ​= ​0.007) and CO2-inhalation (p ​= ​0.015) methods, while not different from the resting-state, i.e. free breathing method (p ​= ​0.52). When comparing the sensitivity of CVR methods, the breath-modulation methods revealed higher Z-statistics compared to the resting-state scan (p ​< ​0.008) and was comparable to breath-holding results. Next, we tested the feasibility of breath-modulation CVR mapping (6 ​s per breath) in 21 cognitively normal elderly participants and compared quantitative CVR values to that obtained with the CO2-inhalation method. Whole-brain CVR was found to be 0.150 ​± ​0.055 and 0.154 ​± ​0.032 %ΔBOLD/mmHg for the breath-modulation and CO2-inhalation method, respectively, with a significant correlation between them (y ​= ​0.97x, p ​= ​0.007). CVR mapping with intermittent breath modulation may be a useful method that combines the advantages of resting-state and CO2-inhalation based approaches.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breath modulation; Cerebrovascular reactivity; End-tidal CO(2); Hypercapnia; Resting-state BOLD fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32278094      PMCID: PMC7292765          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  49 in total

1.  Small vessels, big problems.

Authors:  Steven M Greenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Age dependence of hemodynamic response characteristics in human functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Claudine J Gauthier; Cécile Madjar; Laurence Desjardins-Crépeau; Pierre Bellec; Louis Bherer; Richard D Hoge
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Relationships between hypercarbic reactivity, cerebral blood flow, and arterial circulation times in patients with moyamoya disease.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Michael Ayad; Ryan Moore; Matthias van Osch; Robert Singer; Paul Clemmons; Megan Strother
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Measuring vascular reactivity with resting-state blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal fluctuations: A potential alternative to the breath-holding challenge?

Authors:  Hesamoddin Jahanian; Thomas Christen; Michael E Moseley; Nicholas M Pajewski; Clinton B Wright; Manjula K Tamura; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Cerebrovascular reactivity mapping without gas challenges.

Authors:  Peiying Liu; Yang Li; Marco Pinho; Denise C Park; Babu G Welch; Hanzhang Lu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A case study of magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrovascular reactivity: a powerful imaging marker for mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Suk-tak Chan; Karleyton C Evans; Bruce R Rosen; Tian-yue Song; Kenneth K Kwong
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Impaired cerebrovascular reactivity in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Olga Marshall; Hanzhang Lu; Jean-Christophe Brisset; Feng Xu; Peiying Liu; Joseph Herbert; Robert I Grossman; Yulin Ge
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 18.302

8.  The influence of carbon dioxide on brain activity and metabolism in conscious humans.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Jinsoo Uh; Matthew R Brier; John Hart; Uma S Yezhuvath; Hong Gu; Yihong Yang; Hanzhang Lu
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Routine clinical evaluation of cerebrovascular reserve capacity using carbogen in patients with intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Lindsey M Dethrage; Carlos C Faraco; Lori C Jordan; Paul Clemmons; Robert Singer; J Mocco; Yu Shyr; Aditi Desai; Anne O'Duffy; Derek Riebau; Lisa Hermann; John Connors; Howard Kirshner; Megan K Strother
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Carotid artery stenosis: cost-effectiveness of assessment of cerebrovascular reserve to guide treatment of asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Ankur Pandya; Ajay Gupta; Hooman Kamel; Babak B Navi; Pina C Sanelli; Bruce R Schackman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  Quantitative cerebrovascular reactivity MRI in mice using acetazolamide challenge.

Authors:  Zhiliang Wei; Yuguo Li; Xirui Hou; Zheng Han; Jiadi Xu; Michael T McMahon; Wenzhen Duan; Guanshu Liu; Hanzhang Lu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.737

2.  Optical imaging and spectroscopy for the study of the human brain: status report.

Authors:  Hasan Ayaz; Wesley B Baker; Giles Blaney; David A Boas; Heather Bortfeld; Kenneth Brady; Joshua Brake; Sabrina Brigadoi; Erin M Buckley; Stefan A Carp; Robert J Cooper; Kyle R Cowdrick; Joseph P Culver; Ippeita Dan; Hamid Dehghani; Anna Devor; Turgut Durduran; Adam T Eggebrecht; Lauren L Emberson; Qianqian Fang; Sergio Fantini; Maria Angela Franceschini; Jonas B Fischer; Judit Gervain; Joy Hirsch; Keum-Shik Hong; Roarke Horstmeyer; Jana M Kainerstorfer; Tiffany S Ko; Daniel J Licht; Adam Liebert; Robert Luke; Jennifer M Lynch; Jaume Mesquida; Rickson C Mesquita; Noman Naseer; Sergio L Novi; Felipe Orihuela-Espina; Thomas D O'Sullivan; Darcy S Peterka; Antonio Pifferi; Luca Pollonini; Angelo Sassaroli; João Ricardo Sato; Felix Scholkmann; Lorenzo Spinelli; Vivek J Srinivasan; Keith St Lawrence; Ilias Tachtsidis; Yunjie Tong; Alessandro Torricelli; Tara Urner; Heidrun Wabnitz; Martin Wolf; Ursula Wolf; Shiqi Xu; Changhuei Yang; Arjun G Yodh; Meryem A Yücel; Wenjun Zhou
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.212

3.  Cerebrovascular Reactivity Mapping Using Resting-State BOLD Functional MRI in Healthy Adults and Patients with Moyamoya Disease.

Authors:  Peiying Liu; Gongkai Liu; Marco C Pinho; Zixuan Lin; Binu P Thomas; Melissa Rundle; Denise C Park; Judy Huang; Babu G Welch; Hanzhang Lu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  The Utility of Cerebrovascular Reactivity MRI in Brain Rehabilitation: A Mechanistic Perspective.

Authors:  Venkatagiri Krishnamurthy; Justin D Sprick; Lisa C Krishnamurthy; Jolie D Barter; Aaminah Turabi; Ihab M Hajjar; Joe R Nocera
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  fMRI studies evaluating central respiratory control in humans.

Authors:  Carolina Ciumas; Sylvain Rheims; Philippe Ryvlin
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.342

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.