Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth1, Hrvoje Bogunovic2, Christoph Grechenig2, Patricia Bui2, Maria Fabianska2, Sebastian Waldstein2, Gregor S Reiter2. 1. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Vienna Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: ursula.schmidt-erfurth@meduniwien.ac.at. 2. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Ophthalmic Image Analysis, Vienna Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To quantitatively measure hyperreflective foci (HRF) during the progression of geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using deep learning (DL) and investigate the association with local and global growth of GA. METHODS: Eyes with GA were prospectively included. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) and fundus autofluorescence images were acquired every 6 months. A 500-μm-wide junctional zone adjacent to the GA border was delineated and HRF were quantified using a validated DL algorithm. HRF concentrations in progressing and nonprogressing areas, as well as correlations between HRF quantifications and global and local GA progression, were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 491 SDOCT volumes from 87 eyes of 54 patients were assessed with a median follow-up of 28 months. Two-thirds of HRF were localized within a millimeter adjacent to the GA border. HRF concentration was positively correlated with GA progression in unifocal and multifocal GA (all P < .001) and de novo GA development (P = .037). Local progression speed correlated positively with local increase of HRF (P value range <.001-.004). Global progression speed, however, did not correlate with HRF concentrations (P > .05). Changes in HRF over time did not have an impact on the growth in GA (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Advanced artificial intelligence (AI) methods in high-resolution retinal imaging allows to identify, localize, and quantify biomarkers such as HRF. Increased HRF concentrations in the junctional zone and future macular atrophy may represent progressive migration and loss of retinal pigment epithelium. AI-based biomarker monitoring may pave the way into the era of individualized risk assessment and objective decision-making processes.
PURPOSE: To quantitatively measure hyperreflective foci (HRF) during the progression of geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using deep learning (DL) and investigate the association with local and global growth of GA. METHODS: Eyes with GA were prospectively included. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) and fundus autofluorescence images were acquired every 6 months. A 500-μm-wide junctional zone adjacent to the GA border was delineated and HRF were quantified using a validated DL algorithm. HRF concentrations in progressing and nonprogressing areas, as well as correlations between HRF quantifications and global and local GA progression, were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 491 SDOCT volumes from 87 eyes of 54 patients were assessed with a median follow-up of 28 months. Two-thirds of HRF were localized within a millimeter adjacent to the GA border. HRF concentration was positively correlated with GA progression in unifocal and multifocal GA (all P < .001) and de novo GA development (P = .037). Local progression speed correlated positively with local increase of HRF (P value range <.001-.004). Global progression speed, however, did not correlate with HRF concentrations (P > .05). Changes in HRF over time did not have an impact on the growth in GA (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Advanced artificial intelligence (AI) methods in high-resolution retinal imaging allows to identify, localize, and quantify biomarkers such as HRF. Increased HRF concentrations in the junctional zone and future macular atrophy may represent progressive migration and loss of retinal pigment epithelium. AI-based biomarker monitoring may pave the way into the era of individualized risk assessment and objective decision-making processes.
Authors: Yue Yu; Eric M Moult; Siyu Chen; Qiushi Ren; Philip J Rosenfeld; Nadia K Waheed; James G Fujimoto Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Kathleen Romond; Minhaj Alam; Sasha Kravets; Luis de Sisternes; Theodore Leng; Jennifer I Lim; Daniel Rubin; Joelle A Hallak Journal: Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Date: 2021-08-18
Authors: Patricia T A Bui; Gregor S Reiter; Maria Fabianska; Sebastian M Waldstein; Christoph Grechenig; Hrvoje Bogunovic; Mustafa Arikan; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 4.456
Authors: Antonio Yaghy; Aaron Y Lee; Pearse A Keane; Tiarnan D L Keenan; Luisa S M Mendonca; Cecilia S Lee; Anne Marie Cairns; Joseph Carroll; Hao Chen; Julie Clark; Catherine A Cukras; Luis de Sisternes; Amitha Domalpally; Mary K Durbin; Kerry E Goetz; Felix Grassmann; Jonathan L Haines; Naoto Honda; Zhihong Jewel Hu; Christopher Mody; Luz D Orozco; Cynthia Owsley; Stephen Poor; Charles Reisman; Ramiro Ribeiro; Srinivas R Sadda; Sobha Sivaprasad; Giovanni Staurenghi; Daniel Sw Ting; Santa J Tumminia; Luca Zalunardo; Nadia K Waheed Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 3.770
Authors: Philipp L Müller; Bart Liefers; Tim Treis; Filipa Gomes Rodrigues; Abraham Olvera-Barrios; Bobby Paul; Narendra Dhingra; Andrew Lotery; Clare Bailey; Paul Taylor; Clarisa I Sánchez; Adnan Tufail Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Janan Arslan; Gihan Samarasinghe; Kurt K Benke; Arcot Sowmya; Zhichao Wu; Robyn H Guymer; Paul N Baird Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 3.283