Literature DB >> 32277853

Inter-trial alpha power indicates mind wandering.

Stefan Arnau1, Christoph Löffler2, Jan Rummel2, Dirk Hagemann2, Edmund Wascher1, Anna-Lena Schubert2.   

Abstract

Mind wandering during ongoing tasks can impede task performance and increase the risk of failure in the laboratory as well as in daily-life tasks and work environments. Neurocognitive measures like the electroencephalography (EEG) offer the opportunity to assess mind wandering non-invasively without interfering with the primary task. However, the literature on electrophysiological correlates of mind wandering is rather inconsistent. The present study aims toward clarifying this picture by breaking down the temporal dynamics of mind wandering encounters using a cluster-based permutation approach. Participants performed a switching task during which mind wandering was occasionally assessed via thought probes applied after trial completion at random time points. In line with previous studies, response accuracy was reduced during mind wandering. Moreover, alpha power during the inter-trial interval was a significantly increased on those trials on which participants reported that they had been mind-wandering. This spatially widely distributed effect is theoretically well in line with recent findings linking an increased alpha power to an internally oriented state of attention. Measurements of alpha power may, therefore, be used to detect mind wandering online during critical tasks in traffic and industry in order to prevent failures.
© 2020 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; alpha; mind wandering; resource allocation; time-frequency analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32277853     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  8 in total

Review 1.  Reconceptualizing mind wandering from a switching perspective.

Authors:  Yi-Sheng Wong; Adrian R Willoughby; Liana Machado
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-03-29

2.  Mind Wandering Impedes Response Inhibition by Affecting the Triggering of the Inhibitory Process.

Authors:  Sumitash Jana; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-06-14

3.  Do Attentional Lapses Account for the Worst Performance Rule?

Authors:  Christoph Löffler; Gidon T Frischkorn; Jan Rummel; Dirk Hagemann; Anna-Lena Schubert
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2021-12-24

4.  Cortical and autonomic responses during staged Taoist meditation: Two distinct meditation strategies.

Authors:  Maria Volodina; Nikolai Smetanin; Mikhail Lebedev; Alexei Ossadtchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Task switching reveals abnormal brain-heart electrophysiological signatures in cognitively healthy individuals with abnormal CSF amyloid/tau, a pilot study.

Authors:  Rebecca Johnson Arechavala; Roger Rochart; Robert A Kloner; Anqi Liu; Daw-An Wu; Shao-Min Hung; Shinsuke Shimojo; Alfred N Fonteh; Michael T Kleinman; Michael G Harrington; Xianghong Arakaki
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  The steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) tracks "sticky" thinking, but not more general mind-wandering.

Authors:  Hang Yang; Ken A Paller; Marieke van Vugt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  EEG brain oscillations are modulated by interoception in response to a synchronized motor vs. cognitive task.

Authors:  Laura Angioletti; Michela Balconi
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.543

8.  A vigilance decrement comes along with an executive control decrement: Testing the resource-control theory.

Authors:  Fernando G Luna; Miriam Tortajada; Elisa Martín-Arévalo; Fabiano Botta; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.