Jennifer Shum1, Adam Fogarty2, Patricia Dugan3, Manisha G Holmes3, Beth A Leeman-Markowski4, Anli A Liu3, Robert S Fisher2, Daniel Friedman3. 1. Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: jennifer.shum@nyulangone.org. 2. Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A phase I feasibility study to determine the accuracy of identifying seizures based on audio recordings. METHODS: We systematically generated 166 audio clips of 30 s duration from 83 patients admitted to an epilepsy monitoring unit between 1/2015 and 12/2016, with one clip during a seizure period and one clip during a non-seizure control period for each patient. Five epileptologists performed a blinded review of the audio clips and rated whether a seizure occurred or not, and indicated the confidence level (low or high) of their rating. The accuracy of individual and consensus ratings were calculated. RESULTS: The overall performance of the consensus rating between the five epileptologists showed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.91 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.66. The performance improved when confidence was high (PPV of 0.96, NPV of 0.70). The agreement between the epileptologists was moderate with a kappa of 0.584. Hyperkinetic (PPV 0.92, NPV 0.86) and tonic-clonic (PPV and NPV 1.00) seizures were most accurately identified. Seizures with automatisms only and non-motor seizures could not be accurately identified. Specific seizure-related sounds associated with accurate identification included disordered breathing (PPV and NPV 1.00), rhythmic sounds (PPV 0.93, NPV 0.80), and ictal vocalizations (PPV 1.00, NPV 0.97). CONCLUSION: This phase I feasibility study shows that epileptologists are able to accurately identify certain seizure types from audio recordings when the seizures produce sounds. This provides guidance for the development of audio-based seizure detection devices and demonstrate which seizure types could potentially be detected.
PURPOSE: A phase I feasibility study to determine the accuracy of identifying seizures based on audio recordings. METHODS: We systematically generated 166 audio clips of 30 s duration from 83 patients admitted to an epilepsy monitoring unit between 1/2015 and 12/2016, with one clip during a seizure period and one clip during a non-seizure control period for each patient. Five epileptologists performed a blinded review of the audio clips and rated whether a seizure occurred or not, and indicated the confidence level (low or high) of their rating. The accuracy of individual and consensus ratings were calculated. RESULTS: The overall performance of the consensus rating between the five epileptologists showed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.91 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.66. The performance improved when confidence was high (PPV of 0.96, NPV of 0.70). The agreement between the epileptologists was moderate with a kappa of 0.584. Hyperkinetic (PPV 0.92, NPV 0.86) and tonic-clonic (PPV and NPV 1.00) seizures were most accurately identified. Seizures with automatisms only and non-motor seizures could not be accurately identified. Specific seizure-related sounds associated with accurate identification included disordered breathing (PPV and NPV 1.00), rhythmic sounds (PPV 0.93, NPV 0.80), and ictal vocalizations (PPV 1.00, NPV 0.97). CONCLUSION: This phase I feasibility study shows that epileptologists are able to accurately identify certain seizure types from audio recordings when the seizures produce sounds. This provides guidance for the development of audio-based seizure detection devices and demonstrate which seizure types could potentially be detected.
Authors: Johan B Arends; Jasper van Dorp; Dennis van Hoek; Niels Kramer; Petra van Mierlo; Derek van der Vorst; Francis I Y Tan Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Stephen Fulton; Kate Van Poppel; Amy McGregor; Michelle Ellis; Andrea Patters; James Wheless Journal: J Child Neurol Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 1.987
Authors: A Ulate-Campos; F Coughlin; M Gaínza-Lein; I Sánchez Fernández; P L Pearl; T Loddenkemper Journal: Seizure Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 3.184
Authors: Johan Arends; Roland D Thijs; Thea Gutter; Constantin Ungureanu; Pierre Cluitmans; Johannes Van Dijk; Judith van Andel; Francis Tan; Al de Weerd; Ben Vledder; Wytske Hofstra; Richard Lazeron; Ghislaine van Thiel; Kit C B Roes; Frans Leijten Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 9.910