Literature DB >> 32276167

Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring.

Xiaoting Liu1, Rohan Jayaratne1, Phong Thai1, Tara Kuhn1, Isak Zing2, Bryce Christensen1, Riki Lamont2, Matthew Dunbabin2, Sicong Zhu3, Jian Gao4, David Wainwright5, Donald Neale5, Ruby Kan6, John Kirkwood6, Lidia Morawska7.   

Abstract

Low-cost air quality sensors are increasingly being used in many applications; however, many of their performance characteristics have not been adequately investigated. This study was conducted over a period of 13 months using low-cost air quality monitors, each comprising two low-cost sensors, which were subjected to a wide range of pollution sources and concentrations, relative humidity and temperature at four locations in Australia and China. The aim of the study was to establish the performance characteristics of the two low-cost sensors (a Plantower PMS1003 for PM2.5 and an Alphasense CO-B4 for carbon monoxide, CO) and the KOALA monitor as a whole under various conditions. Parameters evaluated included the inter-variability between individual monitors, the accuracy of monitors in comparison with the reference instruments, the effect of temperature and RH on the performance of the monitors, the responses of the PM2.5 sensors to different types of aerosols, and the long-term stability of the PM2.5 and CO sensors. The monitors showed high inter-correlations (r > 0.91) for both PM2.5 and CO measurements. The monitor performance varied with location, with moderate to good correlations with reference instruments for PM2.5 (0.44< R2 < 0.91) and CO (0.37< R2 < 0.90). The monitors performed well at relative humidity < 75% and high temperature conditions; however, two monitors in Beijing failed at low temperatures, probably due to electronic board failure. The PM2.5 sensor was less sensitive to marine aerosols and fresh vehicle emissions than to mixed urban background emissions, aged traffic emissions and industrial emissions. The long-term stability of the PM2.5 and CO sensors was good, while CO relative errors were affected by both high and low temperatures. Overall, the KOALA monitors performed well in the environments in which they were operated and provided a valuable contribution to long-term air quality monitoring within the elucidated limitations.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air quality; Carbon monoxide; Low-cost sensor; PM(2.5)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32276167     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  13 in total

1.  Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network.

Authors:  Misti Levy Zamora; Colby Buehler; Hao Lei; Abhirup Datta; Fulizi Xiong; Drew R Gentner; Kirsten Koehler
Journal:  ACS ES T Eng       Date:  2022-04-11

2.  Ensemble Machine Learning Model for Accurate Air Pollution Detection Using Commercial Gas Sensors.

Authors:  Wei-In Lai; Yung-Yu Chen; Jia-Hong Sun
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Improving the Quality of Measurements Made by Alphasense NO2 Non-Reference Sensors Using the Mathematical Methods.

Authors:  Mariusz Rogulski; Artur Badyda; Anna Gayer; Johnny Reis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  How to choose healthier urban biking routes: CO as a proxy of traffic pollution.

Authors:  L Bertrand; L Dawkins; R Jayaratne; L Morawska
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-06-18

5.  Calibrations of Low-Cost Air Pollution Monitoring Sensors for CO, NO2, O3, and SO2.

Authors:  Pengfei Han; Han Mei; Di Liu; Ning Zeng; Xiao Tang; Yinghong Wang; Yuepeng Pan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Indoor Air Quality in Domestic Environments during Periods Close to Italian COVID-19 Lockdown.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Pietrogrande; Lucia Casari; Giorgia Demaria; Mara Russo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Ambient PM2.5 and PM10 Exposure and Respiratory Disease Hospitalization in Kandy, Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Sajith Priyankara; Mahesh Senarathna; Rohan Jayaratne; Lidia Morawska; Sachith Abeysundara; Rohan Weerasooriya; Luke D Knibbs; Shyamali C Dharmage; Duminda Yasaratne; Gayan Bowatte
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Assessing the value of complex refractive index and particle density for calibration of low-cost particle matter sensor for size-resolved particle count and PM2.5 measurements.

Authors:  Ching-Hsuan Huang; Jiayang He; Elena Austin; Edmund Seto; Igor Novosselov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Role of Meteorological Variables and Aerosols in the Transmission of COVID-19 During Harmattan Season.

Authors:  S Ogunjo; O Olaniyan; C F Olusegun; F Kayode; D Okoh; G Jenkins
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2022-02-01

10.  A Simple Optical Aerosol Sensing Method of Sauter Mean Diameter for Particulate Matter Monitoring.

Authors:  Liangbo Li; Ang Chen; Tian Deng; Jin Zeng; Feifan Xu; Shu Yan; Shu Wang; Wenqing Cheng; Ming Zhu; Wenbo Xu
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.