| Literature DB >> 32275480 |
Jacqueline Pistorello, David A Jobes, Robert Gallop, Scott N Compton, Nadia Samad Locey, Josephine S Au, Samantha K Noose, Joseph C Walloch, Jacquelyn Johnson, Maria Young, Yani Dickens, Patricia Chatham, Tami Jeffcoat.
Abstract
This randomized controlled trial compared the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) and Treatment as Usual (TAU) for suicidal college students within a feasibility trial. Sixty-two suicidal college students were randomized to CAMS (n = 33) or TAU (n = 29). We hypothesized that those receiving CAMS would show more improvement in suicide-related measures, and effects would be moderated by borderline personality disorder (BPD), prior suicide attempts, and age. Both treatment groups showed improvements in all outcome variables; CAMS had a significantly higher impact on depression and suicidal ideation when measured weekly during care and was more likely than TAU to decrease hopelessness among students with fewer BPD features, no suicide attempt history, and older age. Conversely, TAU did better for students with BPD features and history of multiple suicide attempts.Entities:
Keywords: Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality; college students; counseling center; suicidal ideation; suicidal risk
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32275480 PMCID: PMC7585690 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2020.1749742
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Suicide Res ISSN: 1381-1118