Dmitriy Zamarin1, Robert A Burger2, Michael W Sill3, Daniel J Powell4, Heather A Lankes5, Michael D Feldman4, Oliver Zivanovic1, Camille Gunderson6, Emily Ko2, Cara Mathews7, Sudarshan Sharma8, Andrea R Hagemann9, Samir Khleif10, Carol Aghajanian1. 1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY. 2. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Clinical Trial Development Division, NRG Oncology, Roswell Park, Buffalo, NY. 4. Department of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 5. NRG Oncology Biospecimen Bank-Columbus, Biopathology Center, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH. 6. Stephenson Cancer Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma City, OK. 7. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI. 8. AMITA Health Physicians, Hinsdale, IL. 9. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO. 10. The Loop Immuno-oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical School, Washington DC.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Single-agent PD-1 blockade exhibits limited efficacy in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We evaluated ipilimumab plus nivolumab compared with nivolumab alone in women with persistent or recurrent EOC. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, 1-3 prior regimens, and platinum-free interval (PFI) < 12 months. Participants were randomly allocated to intravenous nivolumab (every 2 weeks) or induction with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for 4 doses (every 3 weeks), followed by every-2-week maintenance nivolumab for a maximum of 42 doses. The primary null hypothesis was equal probability of objective response within 6 months of random allocation in each arm. RESULTS:One hundred patients were allocated to receive either nivolumab (n = 49), or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 51), with PFI of < 6 months in 62%. Six (12.2%) responses occurred within 6 months in the nivolumab group and 16 (31.4%) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group (odds ratio, 3.28; 85% CI, 1.54 to infinity; P = .034). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 and 3.9 months in the nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab groups, respectively, with a PFI-stratified hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.82); the respective hazard ratio for death was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.42). Grade ≥ 3 related adverse events occurred in 33% of patients in the nivolumab group and 49% in the combination group, with no treatment-related deaths. PD-L1 expression was not significantly associated with response in either treatment group. CONCLUSION: Compared with nivolumab alone, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in EOC resulted in superior response rate and longer, albeit limited, PFS, with toxicity of the combination regimen comparable to prior reports. Additional combination studies to enhance durability of the dual regimen are warranted.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Single-agent PD-1 blockade exhibits limited efficacy in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We evaluated ipilimumab plus nivolumab compared with nivolumab alone in women with persistent or recurrent EOC. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, 1-3 prior regimens, and platinum-free interval (PFI) < 12 months. Participants were randomly allocated to intravenous nivolumab (every 2 weeks) or induction with nivolumab plus ipilimumab for 4 doses (every 3 weeks), followed by every-2-week maintenance nivolumab for a maximum of 42 doses. The primary null hypothesis was equal probability of objective response within 6 months of random allocation in each arm. RESULTS: One hundred patients were allocated to receive either nivolumab (n = 49), or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 51), with PFI of < 6 months in 62%. Six (12.2%) responses occurred within 6 months in the nivolumab group and 16 (31.4%) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group (odds ratio, 3.28; 85% CI, 1.54 to infinity; P = .034). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 and 3.9 months in the nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab groups, respectively, with a PFI-stratified hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.82); the respective hazard ratio for death was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.42). Grade ≥ 3 related adverse events occurred in 33% of patients in the nivolumab group and 49% in the combination group, with no treatment-related deaths. PD-L1 expression was not significantly associated with response in either treatment group. CONCLUSION: Compared with nivolumab alone, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in EOC resulted in superior response rate and longer, albeit limited, PFS, with toxicity of the combination regimen comparable to prior reports. Additional combination studies to enhance durability of the dual regimen are warranted.
Authors: Lindsey A Torre; Britton Trabert; Carol E DeSantis; Kimberly D Miller; Goli Samimi; Carolyn D Runowicz; Mia M Gaudet; Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca L Siegel Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Mark Ayers; Jared Lunceford; Michael Nebozhyn; Erin Murphy; Andrey Loboda; David R Kaufman; Andrew Albright; Jonathan D Cheng; S Peter Kang; Veena Shankaran; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Jennifer Yearley; Tanguy Y Seiwert; Antoni Ribas; Terrill K McClanahan Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Nizar M Tannir; David F McDermott; Osvaldo Arén Frontera; Bohuslav Melichar; Toni K Choueiri; Elizabeth R Plimack; Philippe Barthélémy; Camillo Porta; Saby George; Thomas Powles; Frede Donskov; Victoria Neiman; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Pamela Salman; Howard Gurney; Robert Hawkins; Alain Ravaud; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Sergio Bracarda; Carlos H Barrios; Yoshihiko Tomita; Daniel Castellano; Brian I Rini; Allen C Chen; Sabeen Mekan; M Brent McHenry; Megan Wind-Rotolo; Justin Doan; Padmanee Sharma; Hans J Hammers; Bernard Escudier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan Journal: Science Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Julia L Boland; Qin Zhou; Madhuri Martin; Margaret K Callahan; Jason Konner; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Claire F Friedman; William Tew; Vicky Makker; Rachel N Grisham; Martee L Hensley; Nicholas Zecca; Alexia E Iasonos; Alexandra Snyder; David M Hyman; Paul Sabbatini; Carol Aghajanian; Karen A Cadoo; Dmitriy Zamarin Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Jaikumar Duraiswamy; Riccardo Turrini; Aspram Minasyan; David Barras; Isaac Crespo; Alizée J Grimm; Julia Casado; Raphael Genolet; Fabrizio Benedetti; Alexandre Wicky; Kalliopi Ioannidou; Wilson Castro; Christopher Neal; Amandine Moriot; Stéphanie Renaud-Tissot; Victor Anstett; Noémie Fahr; Janos L Tanyi; Monika A Eiva; Connor A Jacobson; Kathleen T Montone; Marie Christine Wulff Westergaard; Inge Marie Svane; Lana E Kandalaft; Mauro Delorenzi; Peter K Sorger; Anniina Färkkilä; Olivier Michielin; Vincent Zoete; Santiago J Carmona; Periklis G Foukas; Daniel J Powell; Sylvie Rusakiewicz; Marie-Agnès Doucey; Denarda Dangaj Laniti; George Coukos Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Na Niu; Weiwei Shen; Yanping Zhong; Robert C Bast; Amir Jazaeri; Anil K Sood; Jinsong Liu Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Shama Virani; Glauco Baiocchi; David Bowtell; Citadel J Cabasag; Kathleen R Cho; Renée T Fortner; Keiichi Fujiwara; Jae-Weon Kim; Martin Köbel; Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz; Douglas A Levine; Usha Menon; Barbara M Norquist; Paul D P Pharoah; Anil K Sood; Shelley T Tworoger; Nicolas Wentzensen; Stephen J Chanock; Paul Brennan; Britton Trabert Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 4.944