Literature DB >> 32275388

Directional Anisotropy of the Vibrational Modes in 2D-Layered Perovskites.

Balaji Dhanabalan1,2, Yu-Chen Leng3,4, Giulia Biffi1,2, Miao-Ling Lin3,4, Ping-Heng Tan3,4, Ivan Infante1, Liberato Manna1, Milena P Arciniegas1, Roman Krahne1.   

Abstract

The vibrational modes in organic/inorganic layered perovskites are of fundamental importance for their optoelectronic properties. The hierarchical architecture of the Ruddlesden-Popper phase of these materials allows for distinct directionality of the vibrational modes with respect to the main axes of the pseudocubic lattice in the octahedral plane. Here, we study the directionality of the fundamental phonon modes in single exfoliated Ruddlesden-Popper perovskite flakes with polarized Raman spectroscopy at ultralow frequencies. A wealth of Raman bands is distinguished in the range from 15 to 150 cm-1 (2-15 meV), whose features depend on the organic cation species, on temperature, and on the direction of the linear polarization of the incident light. By controlling the angle of the linear polarization of the excitation laser with respect to the in-plane axes of the octahedral layer, we gain detailed information on the symmetry of the vibrational modes. The choice of two different organic moieties, phenethylammonium (PEA) and butylammonium (BA), allows us to discern the influence of the linker molecules, evidencing strong anisotropy of the vibrations for the (PEA)2PbBr4 samples. Temperature-dependent Raman measurements reveal that the broad phonon bands observed at room temperature consist of a series of sharp modes and that such mode splitting strongly differs for the different organic moieties and vibrational bands. Softer molecules such as BA result in lower vibrational frequencies and splitting into fewer modes, while more rigid molecules such as PEA lead to higher frequency oscillations and larger number of Raman peaks at low temperature. Interestingly, in distinct bands the number of peaks in the Raman bands is doubled for the rigid PEA compared to the soft BA linkers. Our work shows that the coupling to specific vibrational modes can be controlled by the incident light polarization and choice of the organic moiety, which could be exploited for tailoring exciton-phonon interaction, and for optical switching of the optoelectronic properties of such 2D layered materials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D layered perovskite; Ruddlesden−Popper structure; exfoliation; low temperature; octahedral plane; polarized Raman spectroscopy; vibrational phonon modes

Year:  2020        PMID: 32275388      PMCID: PMC8007126          DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c00435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


Two-dimensional (2D) Ruddlesden–Popper lead halide perovskites have emerged as a highly versatile material for optoelectronic applications[1,2] due to their bright emission,[3,4] strong excitonic and dielectric confinement,[5−7] and photostability in solar energy harvesting under ambient conditions.[8−11] This class of 2D layered perovskites can be fabricated using simple and low-cost strategies in the form of atomically thin layers,[12] single crystals,[13] and ensembles.[14,15] They consist of layers of corner-sharing [PbX6]4– octahedra that are separated by organic ammonium-based cations (e.g., phenethylammonium (PEA) and butylammonium (BA)), which are too large to fit into a three-dimensional (3D) octahedral structure,[5,16,17] and form a natural superlattice of octahedral planes linked by interdigitated bilayers of the organic moieties. This hierarchical architecture has a variety of highly appealing properties that are different from their 3D framework: the inorganic octahedral layers form a quantum well potential for the electronic carriers, in which the confinement can be tuned by the number n of adjacent octahedral planes,[15,16,18,19] an aspect that is also extremely interesting for fundamental studies;[13,20,21] the electron–phonon coupling (and distance) between the inorganic layers can be modified by the choice of the organic moiety;[14,22−24] and the electronic level structure as well as the band gap can be tailored by choice of the halide anion and via lattice deformations.[5,25−27] Furthermore, the presence of long hydrophobic organic moieties intercalated between the octahedral layers protects the layered perovskites from moisture permeation, conferring them structural and functional stability.[6,28,29] The intrinsic structural orientation of the 2D Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites results in distinct optoelectronic and thermal properties due to the extremely different environments that the electrical, optical, and vibrational excitations encounter in and out of plane of the layers.[20,30] For example, the [PbX6]4– layers behave as semiconductors, while the organic spacer is insulating.[31] Such structural anisotropy also has mechanical advantages: the photoluminescence of macroscopic stacks of 2D layered perovskites can be tuned by moderate external pressures due to the related anisotropy of the transition dipole moments,[32] and the layered structure allows for mechanical exfoliation of single flakes with a defined number of octahedral layers and their transfer on suitable substrates.[14] The organic/inorganic bilayer structure behaves mechanically as an organic composite material reinforced by the octahedral layers, with out-of-plane weak bonds (van der Waals) and in-plane strong bonds (covalent or ionic), generating rigid cages when increasing the number of inorganic layers.[1,33−35] Concerning the exciton binding energy, this hybrid structure has the peculiar consequence that the dielectric environment within the octahedral planes is similar to that of an inorganic crystal, leading to strongly bound 2D Wannier-Mott excitons,[36,37] while the exciton confinement out-of-plane is defined by the organic moieties.[6] Such entangled exciton dynamics critically depend on coupling to phonons and distortions of the relatively soft lattice.[4,38] Moreover, the exciton–phonon coupling strongly affects the scattering and decay channels of the excitons, and thus determines the absorbance and emission properties of the material.[13,36,39] Together with the thermal relaxation, these are essential for improving their current performance in optoelectronic devices, such as solar cells and light emitting diodes. Therefore, a detailed understanding of the properties of the vibrational resonances in layered perovskites is crucial to improve our knowledge on their orientation-dependent optoelectronic properties. Recent works already shed some light on the phonons in 2D layered Ruddlesden–Popper phase perovskites,[13,39,40] but a detailed experimental observation of the vibrational modes, in particular, those in the ultralow-frequency regime, is still lacking. In this work, we present a comprehensive study of the fundamental (ultralow-frequency) vibrational modes of single 2D (PEA)2 PbBr4 and (BA)2 PbBr4 layered perovskite flakes by polarized Raman spectroscopy. The flakes consist of multiple layers of single octahedral planes intercalated between the organic moieties (n = 1) and have lateral dimensions that typically exceed tens of micrometers. PEA and BA molecules were chosen as two types of organic moieties that differ in length, structure, and symmetry to elucidate the influence of the organic spacer molecule (Figure ). By correlating the main axes directions of the octahedral lattice with the linear polarization of the incident and detected light, we draw detailed conclusions on the directionality of different vibrational modes. In particular, the bands observed around 50 and 70 cm–1, a frequency range that can be associated with PbBr bending modes, display very different symmetry, which is more pronounced for the (PEA)2PbBr4 flakes. Furthermore, these bands split into a large number of sharp peaks at low temperature, and interestingly, the number of peaks is doubled for the (PEA)2PbBr4 flakes with respect to the (BA)2PbBr4 ones, pointing to anisotropy effects or interlayer coupling. This different behavior highlights the importance of the organic moieties on the vibrational modes and, therefore, on their impact on the electron–phonon interaction. Our work demonstrates that the vibrational modes of the 2D layered perovskites can be designed by the choice of organic linker molecule and that different sets of modes can be preferentially excited by a proper choice of the angle of the linear polarization of the incident light with respect to the orientation of the octahedral lattice.
Figure 1

Structure of the organic and inorganic layers. (a, c) Unit cell of the lattice of the (PEA)2PbBr4 (a) and (BA)2PbBr4 (c) layered perovskites generated from the structure parameters obtained by XRD, as in ref (13). (b, d) Top view of the octahedral layer where the anchoring of the organic moiety is depicted. For the (PEA)2PbBr4 system the phenethyl ring is oriented in diagonal direction such that Pb–Br−π stacking occurs. The arrows in (b) indicate the x,y directions of the pseudocubic octahedral lattice. For simplicity, the octahedra are sketched without distortions.

Structure of the organic and inorganic layers. (a, c) Unit cell of the lattice of the (PEA)2PbBr4 (a) and (BA)2PbBr4 (c) layered perovskites generated from the structure parameters obtained by XRD, as in ref (13). (b, d) Top view of the octahedral layer where the anchoring of the organic moiety is depicted. For the (PEA)2PbBr4 system the phenethyl ring is oriented in diagonal direction such that PbBr−π stacking occurs. The arrows in (b) indicate the x,y directions of the pseudocubic octahedral lattice. For simplicity, the octahedra are sketched without distortions.

Results and Discussion

The layered structure of the perovskite flakes with one octahedral layer (n = 1) separated by the organic cation molecules is schematically shown in Figures and 2a and depicts the anchoring and coupling of the organic molecules. The conformation of the unit cells was plotted using the structure parameters that we obtained from our X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (Figure S1 of the Supporting Information), which agree with those in ref (13). In the top view in Figure b we oriented the bent PEA molecule in diagonal direction such that PbBr−π stacking is formed, which is motivated by our polarized Raman spectroscopy results, as will be discussed in detail later. While the PEA molecules contain phenethyl complexes that are expected to be relatively rigid, BA spacer molecules consist of a linear alkyl chain that is soft and more flexible. Therefore, torsional and bending oscillations of the molecules,[41,42] induced by the vibrations of the inorganic lattice, are more pronounced in the PEA flakes, as confirmed by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. From the as-synthesized 2D layered perovskite materials single flakes (Figure b) can be exfoliated by using the scotch tape exfoliation technique (see Methods). These exfoliated flakes frequently manifest straight edges and rectangular corners as can be seen from the optical microscopy images in Figure S2. The XRD patterns and optical characterization of the flakes are given in Figure S1 and show that the (001) planes are parallel to the substrate, with a spacing of 1.4 and 1.7 nm of the octahedral layers for (BA)2PbBr4 and (PEA)2PbBr4, respectively. These values correspond to n = 1, as we reported in our previous work.[14] Individual flakes manifest a single emission peak around 410 nm due to quantum confinement,[43] and evaluation of the height of the flake by atomic force microscopy (AFM) allows to assign the number of organic/inorganic bilayers in the stack (see Figure S3).[14] Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of single (PEA)2PbBr4 flakes with different thicknesses are reported in Figure S4, and a slight redshift of the emission peak with increasing thickness can be observed, due most likely to self-absorption.
Figure 2

Raman spectra of exfoliated (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 flakes. (a) Scheme of the 2D layered perovskite structure with PEA molecules as spacer and n = 1. (b) Optical microscope image of exfoliated flakes with different thickness, where the different colors result from optical interferences. Scale bar is 5 μm. (c, d) Raman spectra of individual (PEA)2PbBr4 (c) and (BA)2PbBr4 (d) flakes recorded at different temperatures in the range from 4 to 300 K under laser excitation at 633 nm. The temperature is given for each spectrum, and the vibrational bands M1–M5 are indicated by the transparent colored rectangles.

Raman spectra of exfoliated (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 flakes. (a) Scheme of the 2D layered perovskite structure with PEA molecules as spacer and n = 1. (b) Optical microscope image of exfoliated flakes with different thickness, where the different colors result from optical interferences. Scale bar is 5 μm. (c, d) Raman spectra of individual (PEA)2PbBr4 (c) and (BA)2PbBr4 (d) flakes recorded at different temperatures in the range from 4 to 300 K under laser excitation at 633 nm. The temperature is given for each spectrum, and the vibrational bands M1–M5 are indicated by the transparent colored rectangles. Raman spectroscopy was performed under backscattering conditions at room temperature and in a helium-cooled cryostat (Montana Instruments), using a Jobin-Yvon HR800 micro-Raman system equipped with a liquid-nitrogen-cooled charge coupled device detector (CCD) and 50× objective lenses (N.A. = 0.45). An integrated CCD camera and a motorized sample stage allowed us to select the regions of interest with micrometer precision. Raman spectra from single (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 flakes recorded at room temperature show different vibrational bands in the ultralow-frequency regime (Figure c,d), and their frequencies do not depend on the number of layers of the measured flake or on the wavelength of the excitation laser (Figure S5) and are similar under ambient conditions or vacuum (Figure S6). Three dominant Raman bands (labeled as M1–M3) can be observed in the spectrum of the (PEA)2PbBr4 flakes at 300 K (Figure c), together with a band appearing as a broad shoulder at their high frequency side (M4), and another weak band (M5) around 125 cm–1. These Raman bands are a convolution of several vibrational modes that gradually can be discerned with decreasing temperature. Interestingly, the different bands differ in terms of mode splitting, which should be closely related to the nature of the underlying vibrational modes. M1 remains a single peak that gradually becomes sharper with decreasing temperature, while M2 first splits into two peaks (in the range from 250 to 100 K), and then these peaks split again into doublets. A similar behavior is found for the M3 band, which indicates that these modes stem from similar lattice oscillations, which are most likely related to PbBr bond bending as these are dominant in this frequency range (see movies PEA_59 cm-1.gif and PEA_76 cm-1.gif in the Supporting Information). The M4 band that appears as a broad shoulder on the high frequency side of the M3 band at room temperature develops into two well resolved peaks (at 95 and 105 cm–1) at T = 4 K. Finally, the M5 band around 125 cm–1 splits up into two peaks at T = 4 K that are located at 130 and 140 cm–1. DFT modeling shows that oscillations in this frequency range mostly originate from PbBr bond stretching (see movie PEA_135 cm-1.gif in the Supporting Information). Although the main contributions of the vibrations of 2D-layered perovskites that we observe can be associated with the inorganic octahedral layers,[44,45] it is interesting to investigate the influence of the organic moieties. Figure d depicts a similar temperature series of Raman spectra recorded from a single 2D layered perovskite flake with BA as the organic linker molecule. At room temperature, the Raman bands of (BA)2PbBr4 are less resolved with respect to the PEA system. Also, in this case, the Raman peaks become more defined with decreasing temperature, and at T = 4 K a series of sharp peaks can be resolved. Figure shows the Raman spectra of (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 flakes at low temperature (T = 4 K). The M1 band consists of a single peak for both BA and PEA systems, which is in line with its assignment to a twisting/rocking motion of the octahedra that should not depend significantly on the organic moiety.[39] Interestingly, the number of peaks for (BA)2PbBr4 is much smaller than for (PEA)2PbBr4, because the M2 and M3 bands split into fewer modes. The M2 band of the (PEA)2PbBr4 flake consists of a series of six closely spaced peaks, while that of the (BA)2PbBr4 flake has three separated peaks. The M3 band in the PEA flake is split into four peaks at 4 K, while the M3 band for (BA)2PbBr4 remains a single peak that gains in intensity and sharpness with decreasing temperature. The M4 (gray shaded rectangles) and M5 (red-shaded rectangle at 125–135 cm–1) bands that are broad at room temperature in both systems turn into two well-defined peaks at low temperature for both (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 flakes. By comparing the positions of the vibrational bands (in frequency) that are indicated by the transparent colored rectangles in Figure , we find that overall the vibrational frequencies are red-shifted in the BA system with respect to the PEA one. This behavior can be rationalized by the higher stiffness of the PEA molecules. Also, we find an overall blue-shift of all modes with decreasing temperature that is attributed to an increased rigidity of the bonds at lower temperatures. Since we do not observe any abrupt changes in the Raman spectra versus temperature, temperature-induced phase transitions can be excluded. Concerning systems with different halide anions, we would expect that their vibrational modes are qualitatively similar, and that the frequencies shift in relation to the size of the halide, in agreement with the lower frequencies reported for (PEA)2PbI4 in ref (39).
Figure 3

Ultralow-frequency Raman spectra of individual (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 perovskite flakes recorded at T = 4 K. The individual flakes are oriented with one main axis of the pseudocubic octahedral lattice parallel to the linear polarization of the excitation laser. Spectra are offset vertically for clarity. Peak positions are given in Table , and Figure S7 and S8 show Raman spectra recorded for an extended frequency range. The excitation wavelength was 633 nm.

Ultralow-frequency Raman spectra of individual (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 perovskite flakes recorded at T = 4 K. The individual flakes are oriented with one main axis of the pseudocubic octahedral lattice parallel to the linear polarization of the excitation laser. Spectra are offset vertically for clarity. Peak positions are given in Table , and Figure S7 and S8 show Raman spectra recorded for an extended frequency range. The excitation wavelength was 633 nm.
Table 1

Frequencies of the Vibrational Modes Discerned in the Raman Spectra for (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 Flakes at T = 4 K, Together with Their Symmetry and the Tentative Assignment of the Dominant Vibrational Motion

band(PEA)2PbBr4 freq (cm–1)(BA)2PbBr4 freq (cm–1)irreducible representation (D2h symmetry)vibrational motion
M126.821.8B1g, B3goctahedra rocking/twisting
M252.435.7AgPb–Br bond bending
54.9
56.044.9
57.750.3
58.8
M370.361.5B2gPb–Br bond bending and twisting; Br–Pb–Br scissoring in the octahedral plane
72.0
75.0
78.5
80
M495.183.6Agout-of-plane Pb–Br bond stretching
105.389.1
M5131.6106.8Agin/out-of-plane Pb–Br bond stretching
140.7132
To gain insight into the directionality of the vibrational modes, we analyzed the dependence of the Raman bands on the orientation of the flake with respect to the polarization of the excitation and collection signal. Since the exfoliated flakes are flat on the substrate surface, the linear polarization of the excitation and detection light has well-defined angles with respect to the orientation of the octahedral lattice, whose main pseudocubic axis orientations are evident by the straight edges of the flake. Figure shows polarized and depolarized Raman spectra collected at T = 4 K for exfoliated flakes where one main axis of the pseudocubic octahedral lattice is either parallel (horiz) or diagonal (45°) to the linear light polarization. The orientation of the flakes is shown in the insets, and the straight edges give the directions of the main axes of the pseudocubic octahedral lattice. For the horizontal flake direction, for both (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 flakes almost all modes appear in the polarized spectra at 4 K and are absent in the depolarized ones. This either indicates an isotropic character of the underlying vibrations, or implies that they are mainly in direction of the main pseudocubic axes. Only a few weak peaks, for example, at 33, 73, and 132 cm–1 for the (PEA)2PbBr4 flake (Figure a), can be discerned in a depolarized configuration, and these should have an intrinsic anisotropy. Interestingly, for a diagonal orientation (45°) of the flakes, the polarization-dependent Raman spectra of (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 samples are very different. For (PEA)2PbBr4 flakes, the M2 and M3 bands show complementary behavior (Figure b), with the M2 band appearing only in the polarized spectrum, while the M3 band is present only in the depolarized one. This indicates a strong anisotropy that is induced by the PEA linker molecules, and the strong presence of the M3 band under 45° (see also Figure S9 for room temperature data) points to a configuration of the phenethyl rings along the diagonal directions of the pseudocubic octahedral lattice, as sketched in Figure b. On the contrary, for (BA)2PbBr4 flakes, where the inorganic layers are linked by linear alkyl chain molecules, all Raman peaks under the diagonal direction appear in both polarized and depolarized spectra (Figure d). Therefore, the BA linkers do not introduce any significant anisotropy.
Figure 4

Polarization and orientation dependence of the vibrational bands. Polarized Raman spectra recorded from (PEA)2PbBr4 (a, b) and (BA)2PbBr4 (c, d) flakes at T = 4 K under laser excitation at 633 nm. Unpolarized spectra are plotted in black, polarized spectra with polarizer and analyzer in parallel direction in blue, and depolarized spectra with polarizer oriented perpendicular to the analyzer in red color. The insets show optical microscope images of the investigated flakes and their orientation, and the blue circles there indicate the positions chosen for collecting the spectra. The analyzer was kept in vertical direction with respect to these images.

Polarization and orientation dependence of the vibrational bands. Polarized Raman spectra recorded from (PEA)2PbBr4 (a, b) and (BA)2PbBr4 (c, d) flakes at T = 4 K under laser excitation at 633 nm. Unpolarized spectra are plotted in black, polarized spectra with polarizer and analyzer in parallel direction in blue, and depolarized spectra with polarizer oriented perpendicular to the analyzer in red color. The insets show optical microscope images of the investigated flakes and their orientation, and the blue circles there indicate the positions chosen for collecting the spectra. The analyzer was kept in vertical direction with respect to these images. The orientation dependence is also strongly present in the Raman spectra recorded at room temperature, as shown in Figure S9, where the M3 band shows strongest intensity in the depolarized spectra under 45° orientation, and is nearly absent in the polarized spectra under the same angle. For the horizontal direction, the M2 band is the dominant one, and M1 and M3 bands appear in the polarized spectra, but not in the depolarized ones. Interestingly the M5 mode has also a marked polarization dependence at room temperature and is strongest in the depolarized spectrum under horizontal configuration. Normal mode analysis was computationally performed for the (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 structures in their crystalline form (in agreement with ref (13)) after geometry relaxation at the gamma point. Periodic boundary conditions produce the n = 1 multilayer structures that correspond to the flakes that we investigated. To identify possible interlayer coupling effects we have also computed the modes of a single layer structure that was obtained by adding vacuum in the out-of-plane (z) direction. The calculated mode distributions are plotted in Figure S10, and display a very rich mode spectrum that makes it difficult to assign individual modes to the observed Raman peaks. However, the following can be concluded from the DFT modeling: in certain frequency bands the density of the computed modes is particularly high, for example around 40 and 70 cm–1, and in these two bands the dominant vibrational motions are related to PbBr bond bending, and around 70 cm–1 also some scissoring modes can be observed (see movie PEA_76 cm-1.gif in the Supporting Information). For the (PEA)2PbBr4, these vibrations of the inorganic lattice go along with strong bending of the bulky and rigid PEA molecules and torsional motions of the phenethyl ring (see movies PEA_43 cm-1.gif and PEA_59 cm-1.gif in the Supporting Information). Due to their smaller steric hindrance and their softer structure, the BA molecules in (BA)2PbBr4 multilayers perform all sorts of rotations and vibrations and therefore are not particularly in resonance with the vibrations of the inorganic octahedral lattice. Compared to the multilayer structures, the modes in the single layers are shifted to lower frequencies, which is reasonable, since one end of the molecules is free in this configuration. In particular, in the single-layer (PEA)2PbBr4 structure, the bending of the N–C–C angle is released and the molecules unfold. Furthermore, the multilayer structures manifest a larger number of modes with respect to the single layers, which is more prominent for the (PEA)2PbBr4 system. The latter is in good agreement with our experimental Raman results and supports that mode splitting due to interlayer coupling occurs. Based on the temperature-, polarization-, and orientation-dependent Raman spectra and our modeling results, we make a tentative assignment of the observed Raman peaks to the possible vibrational modes of the 2D layered perovskite flakes. The lowest frequency band, M1, can be associated with a rocking/twisting vibration of the heaviest subsystem, represented by the [PbX6]4– octahedra, as already pointed out in other works on iodide based layered perovskites.[39] This octahedral vibration occurs along the main pseudocubic lattice directions and should have one coupled phase across the octahedral plane; therefore, it does not split. The next higher frequency vibrations should be dominated by PbBr bonds within the octahedra, and from modeling we find mostly PbBr bond bending oscillation in the frequency range from 30 to 80 cm–1. It is therefore reasonable to relate the M2 and M3 bands to oscillations of these bonds. The M2 band is intense under excitation with linear polarization parallel to the main pseudocubic axes of the octahedral lattice in polarized configuration, while the M3 band is strong under an angle of 45° in the depolarized configuration. This behavior points to a vibrational motion along the two main pseudocubic axes for M2 and to vibrations along the diagonal of the lattice for M3. Here, the possible oscillations in the three different spatial directions of the 2D layered system could be the reason for the splitting of M2 into three modes, as observed for the (BA)2PbBr4 flakes. The additional mode splitting that occurs in the (PEA)2PbBr4 flakes, resulting in six peaks of the M2 band, is highly peculiar. It could originate from the ordered orientation of the phenethyl ring with respect to the octahedral lattice that induces directional anisotropy or from vibrational coupling between adjacent octahedral layers that is enabled by the relatively rigid PEA linkers (but not by the softer BA ones). Concerning the M3 band, directionality along the diagonal of the octahedral lattice should play a strong role, and this could be induced by bending and scissoring of the in-plane PbBr and BrPbBr bonds, respectively. Also, in the case of the splitting of the M3 band into four peaks that is observed for (PEA)2PbBr4 flakes, the stiffness (and therefore interlayer coupling) and possibly an induced in-plane anisotropy of the PEA linkers could be the origin. The fact that M4 and M5 bands are much weaker and broader compared to M1-M3 points to damping induced by the organic moieties, which for PbBr bond stretching in the out-of-plane direction is reasonable. Here the splitting in two modes could result from in- and out-of-phase oscillations. The frequencies of the different peaks that were identified in the low-temperature Raman spectra, the symmetry of the modes from group theory analysis (performed on a single octahedron), and the assignment of the vibrational motion (from the discussion above) is summarized in Table . We note that even within this simple approach, we are able to assign an irreducible representation of the D2 symmetry group to the main vibrational motions. This assignment also agrees with those from refs (44) and (45). However, the polarization-dependent intensities that can be derived from the Ag, B1g, B2g, and B3g symmetry of the modes (see group theory discussion in the SI) in some parts do not agree with our experimental findings, which can be rationalized by the additional symmetry-breaking that is induced by the organic molecules.

Conclusions

We resolved the low-frequency vibrational modes in Ruddlesden–Popper 2D layered perovskite materials by polarized Raman spectroscopy on single flakes. Temperature- and polarization-dependent measurements allowed us to group sets of modes in bands with common symmetry behavior. PEA and BA molecules as organic linkers led to different Raman bands, both quantitatively, as similar vibrational modes are shifted in frequency, and qualitatively, as modes with different symmetry are observed. In particular, PEA as organic moiety induced a distinct anisotropy in the vibrational bands that occur in the frequency range assigned to PbBr bond bending and scissoring (30–80 cm–1), which should be related to the orientation of the phenethyl ring with respect to the inorganic octahedral lattice. Our detailed experimental characterization elucidates how organic moieties can be tailored for the design of the vibrational coupling between the organic and inorganic components in layered perovskite materials. Such knowledge is highly interesting for optomechanical and thermal coupling, where the interaction strength can be tuned by the choice of organic moiety and via the polarization direction of the incident light.

Methods

Synthesis of Layered Ruddlesden–Popper Perovskites

Two set of RAm2MA–1PbBr3 layered perovskite materials were prepared following our previously reported method.[14] Briefly, the selected amines (phenethylamine and butylamine) were added to a vial containing 95 mg of PbBr2 dissolved in 60 μL of HBr and 1 mL of acetone. The resulting mixture was strongly stirred for few minutes, and the perovskite crystals were collected and dried overnight on filter paper. We used BA and PEA as ammonium ions (RAm), without a source of methylammonium (MA), which results in (PEA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4 platelets with one octahedral layer (n = 1) in the stacks.

Exfoliation and Transfer on Si Substrates

A deposit of platelets was placed on a nonemissive, one-sided 3 M Scotch tape, and the flakes were mechanically exfoliated by gently pushing a clean part of the tape onto the platelet deposits. The tape was then detached collecting thin flakes that were transferred to glass/Si substrates for the experiments.

Optical and Morphological Characterization

An MFP-3D AFM (Asylum Research) atomic force microscopy system operating in intermittent contact mode was used to image the exfoliated flakes and perform the topological analysis. The scan area was set as 5 μm × 5 μm for (PEA)2PbBr4 samples and 10 μm × 10 μm for (BA)2PbBr4 samples with a resolution of 256 × 256 pixels. A PANalytical Empyrean X-ray diffractometer, equipped with a 1.8 kW CuKα ceramic X-ray tube and a PIXcell 3D detector in 2 × 2 mode, was used for X-ray diffraction of the samples that were deposited on a zero-diffraction Si substrate. The diffractometer was operating at 45 kV and 40 mA. A Varian Cary 5000 ultraviolet–visible–near-infrared (UV–vis–NIR) spectrophotometer equipped with an external diffuse reflectance accessory was used to collect the absorption spectra.

Raman Spectroscopy

Raman experiments were performed in nonresonant conditions with wavelengths of 442 nm from a He–Cd laser and 633 nm from a He–Ne laser. 1800 lines/mm and 2400 lines/mm gratings were used in the Raman measurements, where the spectral resolution was 0.19 cm–1 per CCD pixel under 633 nm excitation with 2400 lines/mm. The laser plasma lines were removed by Bragg-volume-grating-based bandpass filters from OptiGrate Corp. Measurements down to 5 cm–1 for each excitation wavelength were achieved by three BragGrate notch filters from OptiGrate Corp. with optical density of 3–4 with full width of half-maximum of 5–10 cm–1. Two vertical polarizers were used for the polarized and depolarized measurements, and a half wave plate was inserted to rotate the laser polarization to be parallel (polarized) or perpendicular (depolarized) to the analyzer. The laser power was kept below 500 μW to avoid laser induced damage. In the temperature-dependent measurements, the sample was first cooled to 4 K and then the temperature was raised stepwise to the indicated values. The photoluminescence spectra were recorded with the Raman spectroscopy setup using a grating with 600 lines/mm and excitation with a laser at 325 nm wavelength.

Modeling

DFT simulations were carried out using the CP2K software.[46] The crystalline structures obtained from XRD analysis were relaxed to the ground-state geometry under tight conditions (10–6 Bohr/Hartree threshold for forces, and 10–10 Hartree threshold for energy). Goedecker–Teter–Hutter pseudopotentials and the MOLOPT basis set were employed within the Gaussian and plane waves (GPW) formalism. Group theory based on DFT calculations on a single Cs4PbBr6 octahedron in vacuum after geometry optimization using the ADF software were performed to analyze the symmetry of the Raman active modes. Cs was used as A-cation to keep the charge balance neutral and to reduce the computational costs.
  28 in total

1.  Atomically thin two-dimensional organic-inorganic hybrid perovskites.

Authors:  Letian Dou; Andrew B Wong; Yi Yu; Minliang Lai; Nikolay Kornienko; Samuel W Eaton; Anthony Fu; Connor G Bischak; Jie Ma; Tina Ding; Naomi S Ginsberg; Lin-Wang Wang; A Paul Alivisatos; Peidong Yang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Revealing Photoluminescence Modulation from Layered Halide Perovskite Microcrystals upon Cyclic Compression.

Authors:  Andrea Castelli; Giulia Biffi; Luca Ceseracciu; Davide Spirito; Mirko Prato; Davide Altamura; Cinzia Giannini; Sergey Artyukhin; Roman Krahne; Liberato Manna; Milena P Arciniegas
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Direct Observation of Electron-Phonon Coupling and Slow Vibrational Relaxation in Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Perovskites.

Authors:  Daniel B Straus; Sebastian Hurtado Parra; Natasha Iotov; Julian Gebhardt; Andrew M Rappe; Joseph E Subotnik; James M Kikkawa; Cherie R Kagan
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Phase Engineering in Quasi-2D Ruddlesden-Popper Perovskites.

Authors:  Yani Chen; Shuang Yu; Yong Sun; Ziqi Liang
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 6.475

5.  Advances and Promises of Layered Halide Hybrid Perovskite Semiconductors.

Authors:  Laurent Pedesseau; Daniel Sapori; Boubacar Traore; Roberto Robles; Hong-Hua Fang; Maria Antonietta Loi; Hsinhan Tsai; Wanyi Nie; Jean-Christophe Blancon; Amanda Neukirch; Sergei Tretiak; Aditya D Mohite; Claudine Katan; Jacky Even; Mikaël Kepenekian
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  2D Homologous Perovskites as Light-Absorbing Materials for Solar Cell Applications.

Authors:  Duyen H Cao; Constantinos C Stoumpos; Omar K Farha; Joseph T Hupp; Mercouri G Kanatzidis
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Simple fabrication of layered halide perovskite platelets and enhanced photoluminescence from mechanically exfoliated flakes.

Authors:  Balaji Dhanabalan; Andrea Castelli; Milan Palei; Davide Spirito; Liberato Manna; Roman Krahne; Milena Arciniegas
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 7.790

8.  Phonon coherences reveal the polaronic character of excitons in two-dimensional lead halide perovskites.

Authors:  Félix Thouin; David A Valverde-Chávez; Claudio Quarti; Daniele Cortecchia; Ilaria Bargigia; David Beljonne; Annamaria Petrozza; Carlos Silva; Ajay Ram Srimath Kandada
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 43.841

9.  High-efficiency two-dimensional Ruddlesden-Popper perovskite solar cells.

Authors:  Hsinhan Tsai; Wanyi Nie; Jean-Christophe Blancon; Constantinos C Stoumpos; Reza Asadpour; Boris Harutyunyan; Amanda J Neukirch; Rafael Verduzco; Jared J Crochet; Sergei Tretiak; Laurent Pedesseau; Jacky Even; Muhammad A Alam; Gautam Gupta; Jun Lou; Pulickel M Ajayan; Michael J Bedzyk; Mercouri G Kanatzidis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Distinct conducting layer edge states in two-dimensional (2D) halide perovskite.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Congcong Wu; Yuanyuan Jiang; Dong Yang; Ke Wang; Shashank Priya
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  3 in total

1.  Unlocking surface octahedral tilt in two-dimensional Ruddlesden-Popper perovskites.

Authors:  Yan Shao; Wei Gao; Hejin Yan; Runlai Li; Ibrahim Abdelwahab; Xiao Chi; Lukas Rogée; Lyuchao Zhuang; Wei Fu; Shu Ping Lau; Siu Fung Yu; Yongqing Cai; Kian Ping Loh; Kai Leng
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  [Methylhydrazinium]2PbCl4, a Two-Dimensional Perovskite with Polar and Modulated Phases.

Authors:  Katarzyna Fedoruk; Dawid Drozdowski; Mirosław Maczka; Jan K Zareba; Dagmara Stefańska; Anna Gagor; Adam Sieradzki
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 5.436

3.  Vibrational relaxation dynamics in layered perovskite quantum wells.

Authors:  Li Na Quan; Yoonjae Park; Peijun Guo; Mengyu Gao; Jianbo Jin; Jianmei Huang; Jason K Copper; Adam Schwartzberg; Richard Schaller; David T Limmer; Peidong Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.