Literature DB >> 32275190

Chronic Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers Is High Among Intensive Care Unit Patients With Non-COVID-19 Sepsis but Carries a Moderately Increased Risk of Death.

Jonas Sunden-Cullberg1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32275190      PMCID: PMC7188028          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


× No keyword cloud information.
In a letter to Hypertension, Esler and Esler[1] suggested angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) to be potential contributors to severe and fatal Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Others have similarly implicated ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors.[2,3] The underlying hypothesis is that these drugs facilitate massive infection by upregulating the ACE2 enzyme, which in its membrane-bound form is used by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) to enter pulmonary cells. Hypertension, coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus are associated with severe course in COVID-19.[4] Because ACE inhibitors/ARBs are often used to treat these conditions, the increased risk may be partly due to adverse drug effects. Data will soon be out on the chronic use of ACE inhibitors/ARBs in COVID-19 patients. To put these into perspective, it is important to know how frequently the drugs are used in similar patients and to what degree use is associated with higher mortality. We, therefore, examined the chronic use of ACE inhibitors/ARBs and associated mortality in a historic cohort of septic patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Data were collected between January 2008 and December 2015 on a nationwide Swedish cohort of 2700 patients, aged 18 years and over, with community-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to the Intensive Care Unit within 24 hours of arrival to any of 32 emergency departments throughout the country. Further details on inclusion criteria, definitions, etc are described elsewhere [5]. The database includes information concerning dispensed drugs to individual patients from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register during 5 years preceding admittance. Dispensed drug during the past 365 days was considered an indicator of chronic use. We describe fraction of patients on ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and ACE inhibitors or ARBs in different strata, including sex, focus of infection, age category, and year of admittance. χ2 and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess the distribution of age and 30-day mortality between ACE inhibitors and ARB users/nonusers in the various strata. Results are summarized in the Table. ACE inhibitors/ARB use was common among patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit because of sepsis. The drugs were used to a slightly higher extent in men than in women, and use increased with age. There was a temporal trend towards increased use. This is confirmed using recent official statistics from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, which shows that the number of patients aged 20–85+ years using ACE inhibitors/ARB drugs nationwide increased linearly from 144 to 183 out of 1000 people between 2010 and 2019, https://sdb.socialstyrelsen.se/if_lak/resultat.aspx. Chronic use among the general population in 2020 is around 10% higher than in 2015, which likely also applies to septic Intensive Care Unit patients. Chronic Use of ACE Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Critical Care Patients Admitted Because of Community-Acquired Sepsis Use indicates higher age and comorbidity, and the fraction of patients that died was higher, but not markedly so, among users compared to nonusers. Surprisingly, there was no difference in death rates between users/nonusers in the subgroup with respiratory infection. ACE inhibitors/ARB use and associated mortality among critically ill COVID-19 patients can be compared with this data. A high incidence of chronic use should be expected, but a major disparity in death rates between users and nonusers may indicate important underlying differences in pathophysiology, including, possibly, adverse effects of ACE inhibitors/ARBs.

Sources of Funding

J. Sunden-Cullberg is supported by a Swedish Government Research Grant and by the Center for Innovative Medicine (CIMED), Karolinska Institute. The funding sources had no role in the design of this study.

Disclosures

None.
Table 1.

Chronic Use of ACE Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Critical Care Patients Admitted Because of Community-Acquired Sepsis

  5 in total

1.  Can angiotensin receptor-blocking drugs perhaps be harmful in the COVID-19 pandemic?

Authors:  Murray Esler; Danielle Esler
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection?

Authors:  Lei Fang; George Karakiulakis; Michael Roth
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 30.700

3.  Hypothesis: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers may increase the risk of severe COVID-19.

Authors:  James H Diaz
Journal:  J Travel Med       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 8.490

4.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Sex-based differences in ED management of critically ill patients with sepsis: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Jonas Sunden-Cullberg; Anton Nilsson; Malin Inghammar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

  5 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and research gaps: Understanding SARS-CoV-2 interaction with the ACE2 receptor and implications for therapy.

Authors:  Prasun K Datta; Fengming Liu; Tracy Fischer; Jay Rappaport; Xuebin Qin
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 2.  Hypertension, Thrombosis, Kidney Failure, and Diabetes: Is COVID-19 an Endothelial Disease? A Comprehensive Evaluation of Clinical and Basic Evidence.

Authors:  Celestino Sardu; Jessica Gambardella; Marco Bruno Morelli; Xujun Wang; Raffaele Marfella; Gaetano Santulli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use Associated with Reduced Mortality and Other Disease Outcomes in US Veterans with COVID-19.

Authors:  Cachet Wenziger; Elani Streja; Amrita Ahluwalia; John G Rizk; Diana Tran; Leila Hashemi; Hamid Moradi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Correlation between anti-hypertensive drugs and disease progression among moderate, severe, and critically ill COVID-19 patients in the second referral hospital in Surabaya: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Satriyo Dwi Suryantoro; Mochammad Thaha; Mutiara Rizky Hayati; Mochammad Yusuf; Budi Susetyo Pikir; Hendri Susilo
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-05-17

5.  Hypertension Update: A Reflection of the Past Decade.

Authors:  Anna F Dominiczak; Trudie J Meyer
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  Hypertension May Reduce the Infection Risk but Increase the Severity of COVID-19: Based on the Current Data in China.

Authors:  Bo Li; Lu Zeng; Nengjun Sun; Yunhe Zhao; Faming Zhao; Hongjun Bian; Wei Yi; Jing Yang; Bin Li; Guohai Su
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.420

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.