| Literature DB >> 32274306 |
Zujiang Yu1, Jingjing Li1, Zhigang Ren1, Ranran Sun1, Yang Zhou2,3, Qi Zhang4,5, Qiongye Wang1, Guangying Cui1, Juan Li1, Ang Li1, Zhenfeng Duan6, Yuming Xu7, Zhichao Wang2,3,8, Peiyuan Yin2, Hailong Piao8, Jun Lv1, Xiaorui Liu1, Yanfang Wang7, Ming Fang9, Zhengping Zhuang4,10, Guowang Xu2,3, Quancheng Kan7.
Abstract
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has a high mortality rate. Metabolic reprogramming is an important mechanism for cell survival. Herein, the metabolic patterns of ACLF patients are analyzed. An in vitro model of ACLF is established using Chang liver cells under hyperammonemia and hypoxia. A randomized clinical trial (ChiCTR-OPC-15006839) is performed with patients receiving L-ornithine and L-aspartate (LOLA) daily intravenously (LOLA group) and trimetazidine (TMZ) tid orally (TMZ group) based on conventional treatment (control group). The primary end point is 90-day overall survival, and overall survival is the secondary end point. By analyzing metabolic profiles in liver tissue samples from hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related ACLF patients and the controls, the metabolic characteristics of HBV-related ACLF patients are identified: inhibited glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle and urea cycle, and enhanced fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and glutamine anaplerosis. These effects are mainly attributed to hyperammonemia and hypoxia. Further in vitro study reveals that switching from FAO to glycolysis could improve hepatocyte survival in the hyperammonemic and hypoxic microenvironment. Importantly, this randomized clinical trial confirms that inhibiting FAO using TMZ improves the prognosis of patients with HBV-related ACLF. In conclusion, this study provides a practical strategy for targeting metabolic reprogramming using TMZ to improve the survival of patients with HBV-related ACLF.Entities:
Keywords: acute‐on‐chronic liver failure; hepatocytes; hypoxia; metabolic reprogramming
Year: 2020 PMID: 32274306 PMCID: PMC7141014 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201902996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1Metabolic profiles in the liver tissue from patients with ACLF. Metabolomics analyses of the liver tissue from 9 patients with ACLF and 15 patients with hepatic hemangioma (normal controls) were performed using GC‐MS and LC‐MS. A) Metabolic changes during glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation and glutamine anaplerosis in the ACLF liver samples compared with the normal control livers. B–D) Expression of proteins in glycolysis (LDHA and LDHB), oxidative phosphorylation (PDHβ, PDK1), FAO (ACLY and CPT1), glutamine anaplerosis (IDH1 and IDH2) and the urea cycle (ASS1 and CPS1) in the ACLF liver samples compared with the normal control liver samples. E) CPT1 and CPT2 activities were evaluated in the ACLF livers samples compared with the normal control livers samples. The metabolite data were converted to base‐10 logs, and compared using Student's t‐tests, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 2Metabolic status of the Chang liver cells exposed to hyperammonemia and hypoxia. A) Hypoxia increased ammonia accumulation in the Chang liver cells. B) Metabolomic analyses of the Chang liver cells exposed to hyperammonemia were performed using GC–MS. Metabolic changes in glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, FAO, and glutamine anaplerosis in the Chang liver cells exposed to hyperammonemia. C–E) Expressions of proteins during glycolysis (LDHA and LDHB), oxidative phosphorylation (PDHβ), FAO (ACLY and CPT1), glutamine anaplerosis (IDH1 and IDH2), and the urea cycle (ASS1, CPS1, and CPS2) in the Chang liver cells exposed to hyperammonemia. F) Metabolic changes during glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, and glutamine anaplerosis in the Chang liver cells exposed to hyperammonemia and hypoxia. The data were compared using Student's t‐tests, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3Metabolism‐based mechanisms for the survival of the Chang liver cells after exposure to hyperammonemia and hypoxia. A) Differences in the metabolic patterns between the surviving Chang liver cells and the whole Chang liver cell population (including both surviving and dead cells) after exposure to hyperammonemia (left and middle panels) and the effect of FAO on glycolysis (right). B) Effect of TMZ on glycolysis, as evidenced by metabolite changes and C) ECAR. D) Ammonia levels in the Chang liver cells exposed to hyperammonemia after TMZ administration. Effect of TMZ on oxidative phosphorylation, as shown by E) OCR and F) ATP generation. G) Effect of TMZ on apoptosis evaluated in the liver tissue from rats exposed to NH4Cl. The data were compared using Student's t‐tests, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Baseline characteristics of the included patients. All values are expressed as means ± standard deviations, medians (with 95% confidence intervals [CI]) or numbers (and percentages). Continuous variables were compared using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis, and categorical variables were compared using chi‐squared tests
| Parameters | SMT | LOLA | TMZ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 48.11 ± 12.095 | 44.44 ± 10.806 | 43.92 ± 14.245 | 0.222 |
| Gender (male) | 34 (75.6%) | 36 (75.0%) | 33 (84.6%) | 0.495 |
| Weight [kg] | 66.71 ± 10.44 | 67.04 ± 12.24 | 66.31 ± 10.78 | 0.955 |
| RBC count | 3.65 (3.47–3.84) | 3.66 (3.38–3.94) | 3.58 (3.27–3.85) | 0.839 |
| WBC count | 8.30 (6.88–9.73) | 7.58 (6.39–8.78) | 6.52 (5.55–7.49) | 0.137 |
| Platelet count (103/mm3) | 75.20 (63.42–89.98) | 83.65 (68.33–98.96) | 78.23 (66.94–89.52) | 0.639 |
| ALT [U L−1] | 394.56 (242.14–546.97) | 422.00 (252.90–591.10) | 484.41 (288.42–680.40) | 0.761 |
| AST [U L−1] | 385.22 (269.29–501.16) | 341.67 (213.14–470.20) | 361.45 (200.68–522.81) | 0.893 |
| Creatinine [mg dL−1] | 1.038 (0.70–1.37) | 0.71 (0.60–0.82) | 0.83 (0.68–0.98) | 0.101 |
| Bilirubin [mg dL−1] | 19.44 (16.51–22.37) | 21.41 (18.55–24.28) | 18.01 (15.06–20.96) | 0.254 |
| INR | 2.24 ± 0.56 | 2.40 ± 0.62 | 2.28 ± 0.78 | 0.467 |
| Serum sodium [mmol L−1] | 136.24 ± 4.68 | 135.66 ± 6.66 | 136.58 ± 4.11 | 0.721 |
| HBV DNA [IU L−1] | ||||
| <500 | 27 (60%) | 27 (56.3%) | 22 (56.4%) | 0.921 |
| ≥500 | 5.56 ± 1.96 | 5.96 ± 1.35 | 5.86 ± 1.84 | 0.285 |
| Ammonia [µmol L−1] | 96.30 (79.52–113.08) | 88.20 (61.56–114.85) | 114.20 (66.84–161. 56) | 0.491 |
| MELD score | 24.04 ± 6.82 | 23.02 ± 4.48 | 22.89 ± 5.65 | 0.587 |
| Survival | 16(35.6%) | 17(35.4%) | 25 (64.1%) | 0.010 |
The number of patients with HBV DNA virus load <500 IU L−1
HBV DNA virus load shown by mean ± standard deviation (lg10) in patients with HBV DNA virus load ≥ 500 IU L−1
ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; INR, international normalized ratio; MELD, model for end‐stage liver disease; LOLA, L‐ornithine and L‐aspartate; RBC, red blood cell; SMT, supportive medical treatment; TMZ, trimetazadine; WBC, white blood cell.
Figure 4Efficacy of TMZ in patients with ACLF was evaluated. A) Glycometabolism in the liver tissue from normal controls and patients with ACLF before and after TMZ treatment was evaluated via 18F‐FDG uptake and PET‐CT analysis. B) Glycometabolism in liver samples from patients with ACLF and patients with cirrhosis were compared by PET‐CT. The data were compared using Student's t‐tests, *p < 0.05. C) Flow diagram of a randomized clinical trial for patients with ACLF divided into three groups: SMT, LOLA, and TMZ. D) The overall survival (OS) of patients with LF after treatment in the two groups was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier analysis.
Analysis of the 90‐day mortality stratified by levels of alanine transaminase. All values are expressed as numbers (and percentages). Categorical variables were compared using chi‐squared tests
| ALT | Outcome | SMT | TMZ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| >400 | Death | 6 (40%) | 4 (26.7%) | 0.4386 |
| Survival | 9 (60%) | 11 (72.3%) | ||
| ≤400 | Death | 23 (76.9%) | 10 (25%) | 0.0088 |
| Survival | 7 (23.1%) | 14 (75%) |
ALT, alanine transaminase; SMT, supportive medical treatment; TMZ, trimetazidine.
Analysis of the 90‐day mortality stratified by levels of aspartate transaminase. All values are expressed as numbers (and percentages). Categorical variables were compared using chi‐squared tests
| AST [U L−1] | Outcome | SMT | TMZ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| >400 | Death | 5 (50.0%) | 4 (45.5%) | 0.3918 |
| Survival | 7 (50.0%) | 6 (54.5%) | ||
| ≤400 | Death | 24 (81.3%) | 10 (32.0%) | 0.0025 |
| Survival | 9 (18.8%) | 19 (68.0%) |
AST, aspartate transaminase; SMT, supportive medical treatment; TMZ, trimetazidine.