Yang Ding1, Rolando Acosta1, Vicente Enguix1, Sabrina Suffren1, Janosch Ortmann2, David Luck1, Jose Dolz3, Gregory A Lodygensky3,3,3. 1. The Canadian Neonatal Brain Platform (CNBP), Montreal, QC, Canada. 2. Department of Management and Technology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3. Laboratory for Imagery, Vision and Artificial Intelligence (LIVIA), École de Technologie Supérieure, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Deep learning neural networks are especially potent at dealing with structured data, such as images and volumes. Both modified LiviaNET and HyperDense-Net performed well at a prior competition segmenting 6-month-old infant magnetic resonance images, but neonatal cerebral tissue type identification is challenging given its uniquely inverted tissue contrasts. The current study aims to evaluate the two architectures to segment neonatal brain tissue types at term equivalent age. METHODS: Both networks were retrained over 24 pairs of neonatal T1 and T2 data from the Developing Human Connectome Project public data set and validated on another eight pairs against ground truth. We then reported the best-performing model from training and its performance by computing the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for each tissue type against eight test subjects. RESULTS: During the testing phase, among the segmentation approaches tested, the dual-modality HyperDense-Net achieved the best statistically significantly test mean DSC values, obtaining 0.94/0.95/0.92 for the tissue types and took 80 h to train and 10 min to segment, including preprocessing. The single-modality LiviaNET was better at processing T2-weighted images than processing T1-weighted images across all tissue types, achieving mean DSC values of 0.90/0.90/0.88 for gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid, respectively, while requiring 30 h to train and 8 min to segment each brain, including preprocessing. DISCUSSION: Our evaluation demonstrates that both neural networks can segment neonatal brains, achieving previously reported performance. Both networks will be continuously retrained over an increasingly larger repertoire of neonatal brain data and be made available through the Canadian Neonatal Brain Platform to better serve the neonatal brain imaging research community.
INTRODUCTION: Deep learning neural networks are especially potent at dealing with structured data, such as images and volumes. Both modified LiviaNET and HyperDense-Net performed well at a prior competition segmenting 6-month-old infant magnetic resonance images, but neonatal cerebral tissue type identification is challenging given its uniquely inverted tissue contrasts. The current study aims to evaluate the two architectures to segment neonatal brain tissue types at term equivalent age. METHODS: Both networks were retrained over 24 pairs of neonatal T1 and T2 data from the Developing Human Connectome Project public data set and validated on another eight pairs against ground truth. We then reported the best-performing model from training and its performance by computing the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for each tissue type against eight test subjects. RESULTS: During the testing phase, among the segmentation approaches tested, the dual-modality HyperDense-Net achieved the best statistically significantly test mean DSC values, obtaining 0.94/0.95/0.92 for the tissue types and took 80 h to train and 10 min to segment, including preprocessing. The single-modality LiviaNET was better at processing T2-weighted images than processing T1-weighted images across all tissue types, achieving mean DSC values of 0.90/0.90/0.88 for gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid, respectively, while requiring 30 h to train and 8 min to segment each brain, including preprocessing. DISCUSSION: Our evaluation demonstrates that both neural networks can segment neonatal brains, achieving previously reported performance. Both networks will be continuously retrained over an increasingly larger repertoire of neonatal brain data and be made available through the Canadian Neonatal Brain Platform to better serve the neonatal brain imaging research community.
Authors: Jose Dolz; Karthik Gopinath; Jing Yuan; Herve Lombaert; Christian Desrosiers; Ismail Ben Ayed Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Pim Moeskops; Max A Viergever; Adrienne M Mendrik; Linda S de Vries; Manon J N L Benders; Ivana Isgum Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Bonnie Alexander; Andrea L Murray; Wai Yen Loh; Lillian G Matthews; Chris Adamson; Richard Beare; Jian Chen; Claire E Kelly; Sandra Rees; Simon K Warfield; Peter J Anderson; Lex W Doyle; Alicia J Spittle; Jeanie L Y Cheong; Marc L Seal; Deanne K Thompson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Sean C L Deoni; Douglas C Dean; Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh; Holly Dirks; Beth A Jerskey Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: A David Edwards; Daniel Rueckert; Stephen M Smith; Samy Abo Seada; Amir Alansary; Jennifer Almalbis; Joanna Allsop; Jesper Andersson; Tomoki Arichi; Sophie Arulkumaran; Matteo Bastiani; Dafnis Batalle; Luke Baxter; Jelena Bozek; Eleanor Braithwaite; Jacqueline Brandon; Olivia Carney; Andrew Chew; Daan Christiaens; Raymond Chung; Kathleen Colford; Lucilio Cordero-Grande; Serena J Counsell; Harriet Cullen; John Cupitt; Charles Curtis; Alice Davidson; Maria Deprez; Louise Dillon; Konstantina Dimitrakopoulou; Ralica Dimitrova; Eugene Duff; Shona Falconer; Seyedeh-Rezvan Farahibozorg; Sean P Fitzgibbon; Jianliang Gao; Andreia Gaspar; Nicholas Harper; Sam J Harrison; Emer J Hughes; Jana Hutter; Mark Jenkinson; Saad Jbabdi; Emily Jones; Vyacheslav Karolis; Vanessa Kyriakopoulou; Gregor Lenz; Antonios Makropoulos; Shaihan Malik; Luke Mason; Filippo Mortari; Chiara Nosarti; Rita G Nunes; Camilla O'Keeffe; Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh; Hamel Patel; Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach; Maximillian Pietsch; Anthony N Price; Emma C Robinson; Mary A Rutherford; Andreas Schuh; Stamatios Sotiropoulos; Johannes Steinweg; Rui Pedro Azeredo Gomes Teixeira; Tencho Tenev; Jacques-Donald Tournier; Nora Tusor; Alena Uus; Katy Vecchiato; Logan Z J Williams; Robert Wright; Julia Wurie; Joseph V Hajnal Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 5.152
Authors: Mallory R Peterson; Venkateswararao Cherukuri; Joseph N Paulson; Paddy Ssentongo; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Benjamin C Warf; Vishal Monga; Steven J Schiff Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 2.375