Literature DB >> 32273773

Exfoliated Human Deciduous Tooth Stem Cells Incorporating Carbonate Apatite Scaffold Enhance BMP-2, BMP-7 and Attenuate MMP-8 Expression During Initial Alveolar Bone Remodeling in Wistar Rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Chiquita Prahasanti1, Alexander Patera Nugraha2,3, Tania Saskianti4, Ketut Suardita5, Wibi Riawan6, Diah Savitri Ernawati7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-tooth extraction socket preservation is necessary due to alveolar bone resorptive patterns through regenerative dentistry approaches that involve the use of stem cells, scaffold and growth factor. Stem cells derived from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) are known to potentially possess the osteogenic ability. Meanwhile, carbonate apatite scaffold (CAS) can act as a biocompatible scaffold capable of supporting mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to proliferate and differentiate optimally. The aim of this study is to investigate the expression of bone morphogenic protein-2 and 7 (BMP2, BMP7) and Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) after the transplantation of SHED-incorporated CAS during in vivo bone remodeling.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 14 healthy, male, Wistar rats, whose mandible anterior teeth were extracted by means of sterile needle holder clamps, constituted the subjects of this study of alveolar bone defects. Two research groups were created: a control group (CAS) as group I and an experimental group (CAS + SHED) as group II. SHED with a density of 106 cells were incorporated into CAS before being transplanted into the experimental group. After 7 days, all the animals were sacrificed and their mandible anterior region extracted. The BMP2, BMP7 and MMP-8 expression were subsequently analyzed by means of immunostaining. An unpaired t-test was conducted to analyze the treatment and control group (p<0.01) data.
RESULTS: The expression of BMP-2 and BMP-7 was higher in group II compared to group I. Meanwhile, the level of MMP-8 was lower in group II than group I. There was greater significant increased expression of BMP-2 and BMP-7 expression in Group II compared to Group I. There was significant decreased expression of MMP-8 between group II than group I (p<0.01).
CONCLUSION: SHED-incorporated CAS can enhance BMP-2 and BMP-7 expression while attenuating MMP-8 expression during in vivo alveolar bone remodeling.
© 2020 Prahasanti et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alveolar bone defect; bone regeneration; carbonate apatite scaffold; osteogenic ability; stem cell from human exfoliated deciduous teeth

Year:  2020        PMID: 32273773      PMCID: PMC7102906          DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S245678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent        ISSN: 1179-1357


Introduction

Indonesia is the largest archipelagic country in the world with a population of 271,786,538 in 2019.1 Its expansive territory and dense population induce numerous medical conditions such as oral health problems.2 The prevalence of oral disease within the country, including dental caries and periodontitis, is relatively high. According to the findings issued in 2018 by the Basic Health Research Department (Riset Kesehatan Dasar or RISKESDAS) of the Ministry of Health, 57.6% of Indonesia’s population experienced oral health problems that can affect the quality of life. Meanwhile, the prevalence of caries among that section of the populace aged between 12 and more than 65 years old ranged from 65.5% to 95%.3 Oral health problems such as dental caries must be treated immediately and appropriately in order to prevent caries of such severity that the affected teeth must be extracted. However, in Indonesia, dental caries are frequently neglected and remain untreated, with only 10.2% of oral health problems receiving attention.3 The most common etiology of tooth loss is dental caries. Moreover, in Indonesia, tooth extraction has been the most frequent form of treatment applied to severe dental caries that potentially lead to bone defects.4 The percentage of procedures involving tooth extraction in Indonesia stands at approximately 79.6%.4,5 Unnecessary tooth extraction can precipitate certain complications such as alveolar bone fractures (31.82%), prolong bleeding (4.54%), and inflammation (2.27%).4,6 The normal sequence of post-tooth extraction bone healing is resorptive, usually involving both hard and soft tissue defects in the alveolus area, but without socket preservation.7 The loss of periodontal tissue structure in the afflicted area is problematic and can affect both the aesthetic and functional outcomes of dental prosthetics.8 Post-extraction socket preservation, involving the use of bone graft as biomaterial scaffold, is necessary due to the alveolar bone resorptive pattern.9 Regenerative dentistry involving the application of tissue engineering techniques is emerging and becoming increasingly popular. Triad tissue engineering combines biocompatible scaffold seeds, growth factor, and stem cells which are then transplanted into affected areas to enhance the remodeling or regeneration of defective tissue.10 Bone regeneration can be optimally achieved by the application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).11 The oral cavity is a unique site with potential resources for MSCs such as gingival mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs),12–15 dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells (DPSCs)16,17 and stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED).18 MSCs demonstrate the potential ability to differentiate into various cell types within the mesenchymal lineage through osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation.19 In addition, MSCs also possess the ability to accelerate wound healing by means of their paracrine and autocrine effects which enhance cell migration to injured tissue.20 One promising source of MSCs in the orofacial region is SHED which demonstrates potential osteogenic differentiation ability supportive of bone defect regeneration.21 Nevertheless, biocompatible scaffold is necessary to support and optimally facilitate MSCs proliferation.10,11 Carbonate apatite scaffold (CAS) biomaterial is relatively popular and frequently employed in Indonesia to stimulate bone regeneration as a means of overcoming excessive bone resorption. GAMA-CHA®, a product used in this study, is a scaffold fabricated and formulated in Indonesia which consists of carbonate apatite and gelatin.22 SHED can attach and proliferate optimally due to CAS (GAMA-CHA®) rather than hydroxyapatite.18 Meanwhile, at present, no study has been conducted that analyzes the ability of the SHED incorporated in CAS (GAMA-CHA®) to ameliorate alveolar bone defect in animal models. The hypothesis of this study is that the transplantation of SHED-incorporated CAS enhances bone remodeling through bone morphogenetic 2 and 7 expressions (BMP-2 and BMP-7) and attenuates matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) expression in animal models. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the expression of BMP-2, BMP-7 and MMP-8 following the transplantation of SHED-incorporated CAS to animal models.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Animal Study Preparation

This study constituted a true experimental study with post-test-only control group design. The sample was selected by means of simple randomized blind sampling. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia (No. 042/HRECC. FODM/IV/2017). A total of 14 healthy, male, 12 to 16-week-old, Wistar rats approximately 200–250 grams in weight supplied by the Animal Breeding Laboratory of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Airlangga University constituted the animal subjects. Animal ethics and welfare guidelines formed the study protocol were carried out in accordance with the Animal Research: Reporting of in vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines to ameliorate any suffering of the animals. During a one-week adaptation period, the subjects were provided with food and water ad libitum, with husk replacement occurringevery second day. Two groups participated in this study, namely; a control group and an experimental group (CAS + SHED). CAS (GAMA-CHA, Jogjakarta, Indonesia). The subjects were administered a rodent anesthetic intramuscularly (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, US) (xylazine and ketamine 0.1 mL/10 g body weight). After the subjects had been anesthetized, tooth extraction was completed.

Alveolar Bone Defect Animal Model

An alveolar bone defect was effected which facilitated the extraction of the mandible anterior teeth. The incisors and surrounding areas were cleaned with iodine. The extraction was performed slowly and gently on the left lower incisors using a PT2 (Hu-Friedy) periotome, using special modifications and forceps. Tooth extraction sockets were filled with CAS only or SHED incorporated CAS to be studied (Figure 1). The extracted mandibular incisors area was then closed using a 5.0 suture monofilament thread following the previous method by Khoswanto.23
Figure 1

An alveolar bone defect was effected which facilitated the extraction of the mandible anterior teeth animal model.

An alveolar bone defect was effected which facilitated the extraction of the mandible anterior teeth animal model. The SHED used in this study was obtained according to specific inclusion criteria such as the presence of vital conditions, the absence of caries, and the root resorption of deciduous teeth. The method of producing SHED culture adhered to that employed in previous studies. Normal exfoliated human deciduous were collected from 7- to 10-year-old children due to orthodontic treatment under approved guidelines set by the National Institutes of Health Office of Human Subjects Research. SHED culture was produced at the Tissue Bank of the Diagnostic Center, Dr. Soetomo Surabaya General Hospital, using Dulbeccos Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM®, Life Technologies, Gibco BRLTM, USA) with the addition of 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Biochrom AG®, Germany), 5 mm L-glutamine (Gibco Invitrogen®, 25, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin-G, 100 ug/mL streptomycin, and 100 ug/mL kanamycin (Gibco Invitrogen®, 25, USA). The SHED culture medium was changed once every 3 days in order to eliminate those cells which were not attached to the culture plate and transfer the SHED to a new culture medium. The pulp was separated from a remnant crown and then digested in a solution of 3 mg/mL collagenase type I (Worthington Biochem, Freehold, NJ) and 4 mg/mL dispase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 1 h at 37°C. Single-cell suspensions were cultured in a regular medium as reported.18,20,21 SHED within passage three with a density of 106 cells in single cell was incorporated into CAS before being transplanted directly after the tooth extraction.24 All the animals were observed for 7 days at which point all were sacrificed by means of rodent anaesthesia (60 mg/b w of ketamine and xylazine 3 mg/bw). The affected area of the periodontal tissue in each sample was then extracted. Each tissue sample was immersed in 10% formalin (OneMed, Indonesia) for 3 days to achieve fixation, after which the sample was decalcified with 5% EDTA (OneMed®, Indonesia) for a period of 1 month. In addition, tissue processing, including clearing and impregnation, was performed on all samples. The paraffin blocks were subsequently serially sectioned using a microtome.25

Immunohistochemistry Staining

Immunohistochemistry staining was performed by means of a 3.3ʹ-diaminobenzidine stain kit (DAB) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, US). Monoclonal antibodies (AbMo) of BMP-2 (sc-137087), BMP-7 (sc-53917), and MMP-8 (sc-514803) were used in this study (Santa Cruz Biotechnology™, US). The observation and examination of the expression number of BMP-2, BMP-7, and MMP-8 in the alveolar bone were conducted in five different visual fields by two observers using a Nikon H600L light microscope (Japan) at 1000x magnification (Nikon, Japan).26

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using a Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 20.0 version (IBM corporation, Illinois, Chicago, United State). An unpaired t-test was employed to analyze the treatment and control group data. The expression of BMP-2, BMP-7, and MMP-8 in each group (p<0.01) was then compared.

Results

The BMP-2 and BMP-7 expressions were higher in group II than in group 1 (Figures 2 and 3). MMP-8 levels were lower in group II than in group I (Figure 4). There were more significantly increased expressions of BMP-2 and BMP-7 in group II compared to group I (p<0.01). Meanwhile, there was a significantly decreased expression of MMP-8 in group II compared to group I (p<0.01) (Table 1).
Figure 2

The periodontal tissue histological section of an afflicted subject. (A) AbMo and DAB were used to perform immunohistochemical analysis of BMP-2 expression. Positive cells appeared brown in color (red arrow) through a light microscope at 1000x magnification. (B) The number of positive expressions of BMP-2 is shown. The statistical significance of differences between groups was examined by means of an unpaired t-test (n = 7; **Information: significant at p < 0.01).

Figure 3

The periodontal tissue histological section of an afflicted subject. (A) AbMo and DAB were used to perform immunohistochemical analysis of BMP-7 expression. Positive cells appeared brown in color (red arrow) through a light microscope at 1000x magnification. (B) The number of positive expressions of BMP-7 is shown. The statistical significance of differences between groups was examined by means of an unpaired t-test (n = 7; **Information: significant at p < 0.01).

Figure 4

The periodontal tissue histological section of an afflicted subject. (A) AbMo and DAB were used to perform immunohistochemical analysis of MMP-8 expression. Positive cells appeared brown in color (red arrow) through a light microscope at 1000x magnification. (B) The number of positive expressions of MMP-8 is shown. The statistical significance of differences between groups was examined by means of an unpaired t-test (n = 7; **Information: significant at p < 0.01).

Table 1

The Description of Each Group Mean ± Standart Deviation (SD), Result of t-Test of Each Marker Between Groups (n=7)

GroupMolecular Marker
Mean ± SD
BMP-2BMP-7MMP-8
CAS7 ± 0.913.5 ± 0.6513 ± 1.29
CAS+SHED14.75 ± 0.8511 ± 1.356 ± 1.47
*Sig0.00100.00010.0001

Note: *Significant at p value < 0.01.

The periodontal tissue histological section of an afflicted subject. (A) AbMo and DAB were used to perform immunohistochemical analysis of BMP-2 expression. Positive cells appeared brown in color (red arrow) through a light microscope at 1000x magnification. (B) The number of positive expressions of BMP-2 is shown. The statistical significance of differences between groups was examined by means of an unpaired t-test (n = 7; **Information: significant at p < 0.01). The periodontal tissue histological section of an afflicted subject. (A) AbMo and DAB were used to perform immunohistochemical analysis of BMP-7 expression. Positive cells appeared brown in color (red arrow) through a light microscope at 1000x magnification. (B) The number of positive expressions of BMP-7 is shown. The statistical significance of differences between groups was examined by means of an unpaired t-test (n = 7; **Information: significant at p < 0.01). The periodontal tissue histological section of an afflicted subject. (A) AbMo and DAB were used to perform immunohistochemical analysis of MMP-8 expression. Positive cells appeared brown in color (red arrow) through a light microscope at 1000x magnification. (B) The number of positive expressions of MMP-8 is shown. The statistical significance of differences between groups was examined by means of an unpaired t-test (n = 7; **Information: significant at p < 0.01). The Description of Each Group Mean ± Standart Deviation (SD), Result of t-Test of Each Marker Between Groups (n=7) Note: *Significant at p value < 0.01.

Discussion

In this study, it was found that the post-transplantation incorporation of SHED into CAS could increase the BMP-2 and BMP-7 expression higher than the group transplanted only with CAS and with a significant difference. Enhancement of BMPs' expression constitutes the marker that bone remodeling had occurred. At present, 20 types of BMP exist and several studies have asserted that BMP-2 and BMP-7 can accelerate the regeneration of lost or damaged bone tissue such as occurs in critical sized bone defects and skeletal fractures.27–29 Osteoblast is differentiated and proliferated by stimulation of BMPs.30 MSCs differentiation, bone formation or remodeling, and skeletal development are controlled by BMPs through several forms of signaling and transduction.31 For example, BMP-2 and BMP-7 can enhance osteogenic bone regeneration.32 Previous studies have asserted that the BMP2 knockdown (KO) model results in the absence of bone marrow cavity formation with the result that the cortical bone or trabecular bone is defective. Osterix expression was also reduced in the BMP2 KO model.33 MSCs can induce BMP-2 and BMP-7 expression to stimulate bone regeneration. The CAS (GAMACHA) employed in this study served as bioscaffold material that supports the optimal differentiation and proliferation of SHED into osteogenic lineage.18 A previous study conducted by Wu and team stated that post-transplantation of MSCs in a rabbit model of avascular necrosis of femoral head can enhance the BMP-2 expression level that stimulates in vivo revascularization and bone remodeling of the afflicted area.34 Meanwhile, a study conducted by Liu and team mentions the significantly increased expression of BMP-7 in BMSCs in vitro culture indicating that the enhancement of BMP-7 expression can be used as BMSC-based cell therapy for osteoarthritis.35 The results of those studies were in line with and support the findings of the authors that showed post-transplantation of SHED can stimulate the enhancement of BMP-2 and BMP-7 in the alveolar bone defect area. On the other hand, it was found that MMP-8 expression had significantly decreased in the group with CAS and SHED compared to the group with CAS only. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are groups of proteolytic enzymes that play a major role in tissue destruction, remodeling, and immune responses.36 MMP-8 at higher concentrations was found in individuals with periodontitis compared to those in good health.37 Abnormalities or overexpression of MMPs in ECM can induce bone resorption or osteolysis.38 MMP-8 was the pro-active collagenase that can be found in the Western blot results of peri-implantitis patients.39 MMP-8 can be used as a predictor marker for alveolar bone loss in peri-implantitis during its active period.39 Differentiation of MSCs into several lineages is controlled by MMPs. Exogenous MMPs at their surface interact with MSCs. Specific MMPs regulate the differentiation, angiogenesis, proliferation and migration of MSCs. A study conducted by Mayney and Volloch found increased expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) such as TIMP-2 and TIMP-4, while levels of MMP-1 and MMP-8 were both reduced during osteogenic differentiation. This indicated the downregulated or upregulated expression of MMPs and TIMPs in differentiation-specific manners.40,41 These results were similar to the ones produced by this study showed that the SHED incorporated CAS group had lower MMP-8 expression compared to the control group. CAS has abilities such as osteoinductive and osteoconductive which induce the microenvironment suitable for SHED differentiation into osteogenic lineage.18,22 SHED also proliferate optimally within CAS that can secrete various beneficial growth factors and cytokines that support bone regeneration. Compared with hDPSCs or hBMSCs, SHED has highly proliferative and superior osteogenic differentiation ability. Unlike BMSCs, SHED can also be obtained through minimal invasive surgical procedures. SHED has been suggested as a potentially promising MSCs source from the orofacial region for bone regeneration treatment.42 Nevertheless, some pathological conditions and some therapies influence the behavior of the bone tissue that we could not ignore. This study results only limited for animal study. Thus, further study is still required with a better sample size and design for future investigation and application in human being. This is an important step that needs more variables before we can reproduce and generalize the results.

Conclusion

Based on the research results above, it can be concluded that SHED-incorporated CAS can enhance BMP-2 and BMP-7 expression while attenuating MMP-8 expression during alveolar bone remodeling in wistar rats (R. norvegicus). In the future, SHED-incorporated CAS may become a promising treatment for orofacial tissue region regeneration in human being.
  27 in total

1.  Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  S Gronthos; M Mankani; J Brahim; P G Robey; S Shi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  SHED: stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth.

Authors:  Masako Miura; Stan Gronthos; Mingrui Zhao; Bai Lu; Larry W Fisher; Pamela Gehron Robey; Songtao Shi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Postextraction maintenance of the alveolar ridge: rationale and review.

Authors:  Garima Agarwal; Raison Thomas; Dhoom Mehta
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2012-05

Review 4.  Matrix Metalloproteinases in Bone Resorption, Remodeling, and Repair.

Authors:  Katiucia B S Paiva; José M Granjeiro
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.622

5.  Adult human bone marrow stromal cells regulate expression of their MMPs and TIMPs in differentiation type-specific manner.

Authors:  Joshua Mauney; Vladimir Volloch
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 11.583

Review 6.  Matrix metalloproteinase-8 levels in periodontal disease patients: A systematic review.

Authors:  E F de Morais; J C Pinheiro; R B Leite; P P A Santos; C A G Barboza; R A Freitas
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.419

7.  Genetic analysis of the roles of BMP2, BMP4, and BMP7 in limb patterning and skeletogenesis.

Authors:  Amitabha Bandyopadhyay; Kunikazu Tsuji; Karen Cox; Brian D Harfe; Vicki Rosen; Clifford J Tabin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Angiogenesis and bone regeneration by mesenchymal stem cell transplantation with danshen in a rabbit model of avascular necrotic femoral head.

Authors:  Yungang Wu; Chunwu Zhang; Jianjing Wu; Yan Han; Chunlei Wu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: A consequence of a fundamental principle of bone physiology.

Authors:  Stig Hansson; Anders Halldin
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2012-08-16

10.  Osteogenic Differentiation and Biocompatibility of Bovine Teeth Scaffold with Rat Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Desi Sandra Sari; Ernie Maduratna; Fourier Dzar Eljabbar Latief; Alexander Patera Nugraha; Ketut Sudiana; Fedik Abdul Rantam
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-09-16
View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the multiple tissue factors in bone of primary osteoplasty and rhinoplasty in patients affected by cleft lip palate.

Authors:  Dace Buile; Māra Pilmane; Ilze Akota
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.130

2.  Combination of Carbonate Hydroxyapatite and Stem Cells from Human Deciduous Teeth Promotes Bone Regeneration by Enhancing BMP-2, VEGF and CD31 Expression in Immunodeficient Mice.

Authors:  Nurul Aisyah Rizky Putranti; Ryo Kunimatsu; Kodai Rikitake; Tomoka Hiraki; Kengo Nakajima; Takaharu Abe; Yuji Tsuka; Shuzo Sakata; Ayaka Nakatani; Hiroki Nikawa; Kotaro Tanimoto
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 7.666

3.  Gingival-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell from Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): Isolation, Culture, and Characterization.

Authors:  Alexander Patera Nugraha; Fedik Abdul Rantam; Ida Bagus Narmada; Diah Savitri Ernawati; Igo Syaiful Ihsan
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 4.  Mechanisms of bone remodeling and therapeutic strategies in chronic apical periodontitis.

Authors:  Xutao Luo; Qianxue Wan; Lei Cheng; Ruoshi Xu
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.073

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.