Brain Metabolism in Rats with Neuropathic Pain Induced by Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injury and Treated via Electroacupuncture.

PURPOSE: Brain organisation is involved in the mechanism of neuropathic pain. Acupuncture is a common clinical practise in traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of chronic pain. This study explored electroacupuncture's effects on brain metabolism following brachial plexus avulsion injury (BPAI)-induced pain.
METHODS: A total of 32 female rats were randomised into a normal group, model group, sham electroacupuncture group, and electroacupuncture group. A pain model was included via right BPAI. The electroacupuncture intervention at cervical "Jiaji" points (C5-7) was performed for 11 weeks. The mechanical withdrawal threshold of the non-injured (left) forepaw was measured at the baseline and on days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, 84, and 112 subsequent to BPAI. Positron emission tomography (PET) was applied to explore metabolic changes on days 28, 84, and 112.
RESULTS: After electroacupuncture, the mechanical withdrawal threshold of the left forepaws was significantly elevated and the effect persisted until 4 weeks after the intervention ceased (p<0.05 or p<0.001). In the sensorimotor-related brain regions, standardised uptake values in the bilateral somatosensory and motor cortices were observed in the electroacupuncture group. Metabolism particularly increased in the right somatosensory cortex. Metabolism changes also occurred in the pain-related brain regions and emotion- and cognition-related brain regions.
CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated the beneficial effects of electroacupuncture for relieving BPAI-induced neuropathic pain in rats. Electroacupuncture intervention might inhibit maladaptive plasticity in brain areas governing multidimensional functions, especially in sensorimotor- and cognition-related cortices.

Introduction

Brachial plexus avulsion injury (BPAI) is a type of devastating damage that causes upper extremity disability.1 It not only affects physical and psychological function but also causes neuropathic pain in many patients. Neuropathic pain is a common complication of BPAI, characterised by burning, crushing, and shooting pain or electric shock sensations.2–4 Chronic pain, with an incidence of 30–80%,5 seriously affects the patients’ quality of life and has been one of the most challenging problems in medicine and biology.6–8 Unfortunately, neuropathic pain is usually resistant to medical treatment and has a high recurrence rate even after invasive interventions.9

Multidimensional aspects may be involved in the mechanism of neuropathic pain. Accumulating evidence indicates that brain plasticity is an important contribution.10,11 Large-scale brain organisation may be critical to its development and maintenance.12 Alterations of the cortical structures have proved to be related to the regions that correspond to the affected limb.10 Neuroplasticity may also include subcortical areas.13

Acupuncture is one of the oldest clinical practises in traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of many symptoms and disorders, such as stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, and chronic pain. The pathologies of acupuncture are also related to neural plasticity.14,15 In previous studies, Wang et al suggested that electroacupuncture (EA) reduces the effects of electrical activity of pain-related neurons in the hippocampus of rats with neuropathic pain.16 Using fMRI, Theysohn et al found that acupuncture could modulate brain activity under pain conditions in the cingulate gyrus, insula, primary somatosensory cortex, and prefrontal areas.17 However, how EA affects brain metabolism following BPAI-induced pain is largely unknown.

With rapid progress of neuroimaging techniques, dynamic central mechanisms of nociceptive information processing could be explored under noninvasive conditions. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a useful method for the study of brain function and the early diagnosis of nervous system diseases. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG), which is an analogue of glucose labelled with the radionuclide 18F, is the most widely used radiopharmaceutical in PET to monitor the brain’s glucose metabolic rate.18

As it was inapplicable to compare pre- and post-BPAI brain mechanism in human patients, we applied EA in rats with BPAI-induced pain and tested their dynamic brain mechanisms using small animal PET.

Methods

Animals

A total of 32 healthy female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (weighing 180–200 g and aged 6–8 weeks) were housed in a laboratory environment maintained at 20–22°C with a 12-h light-dark cycle and given sufficient food and water for at least 1 week before any intervention. The rats were obtained from Shanghai Slack Laboratory Animal Limited Liability Company (Shanghai, China).

The rats were randomly divided into four groups (eight rats in each group): a normal group, model group, sham electroacupuncture (sham EA) group, and electroacupuncture (EA) group. The present study focused on the effects of EA on brain metabolism following BPAI-induced neuropathic pain. The feasibility of the BPAI-induced neuropathic pain model was already confirmed in our previous studies,19 we did not include a sham surgery group.

The protocols were in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health and approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Protocol number: SZY20171211001).

BPAI Model

The rats were anesthetised with sodium pentobarbital through intraperitoneal injection (40 mg/kg). After the scuff was shaved, each rat was placed in a prone position on a heated clean surgical table. A longitudinal 4 cm incision was made along the dorsal midline from the occiput to scapula angulus superior. The longissimus capitis muscle, semispinalis muscle of the neck, biventer cervicis, and complex muscle were pulled aside. Then, the muscles on the vertebral plate and spinal process were removed, and hemilaminectomies from C4 to T1 were performed to expose the nerve roots from C5 to T1. The C5, C6, C7, C8, and T1 nerve roots on the right side were identified and avulsed from the spinal cord using a retractor (Figure 1A and B). After applying penicillin powder to the wound, the tissue layers and skin were closed with 4-0 silk sutures. All of the procedures were completed by the same technician using an operating microscope. (magnification ×10)

Figure 1

Schematic of the animal’s groups. The rats were randomly divided into four groups (eight rats in each group): normal group, model group, electroacupuncture (EA) group, and sham electroacupuncture (sham EA) group. (A) Normal group: No particular-operation and therapeutic intervention was applied. (B) Model group: Nerve roots of C5, C6, C7, C8, and T1 on the right side were identified and avulsed from the spinal cord. (C) EA group: electroacupuncture were applied to the left side of the cervical EX-C5, EX-C6, and EX-C7 “Jiaji” points (5 mm lateral to the C5–C7 cervical spine on the left side). (D) Sham EA group: the acupoints were 3 mm lateral to the C5–C7 cervical “Jiaji” acupoints without electrical output.

Abbreviations: L, left; R, right. C5-8, cervical vertebra 5–8, T1, thoracic vertebra 1, EX-C5-7, cervical “Jiaji” points (C5-7), the grey shadow area indicated the paralysed forepaws after BPAI.

Interventions

The EA intervention was performed at a relatively fixed time on the seventh day after BPAI. During the intervention, the environment was quiet under controlled room temperature (25.0±1.0°C). The rats were placed on a custom-made experimental table and disposable sterile stainless-steel needles were inserted on the left cervical side “Jiaji” points EX-C5, EX-C6, and EX-C7 (5 mm lateral to C5-C7 on the left side at a depth of 3–5 mm) according to acupoint atlas for experimental animal rats (Figure 1C).20 The needle handles were connected to the output terminal of an electroacupuncture instrument. The EA parameters were set at dense dispersive waves of 2/15 Hz, and the current intensity was adjusted to induce slight muscle twitching.21 The EA intervention was performed 30 mins/day, 5 days per week for 11 weeks. All of the rats had received adaption training for 3 days prior to the first intervention.

In the sham EA group, the environment was the same as previously described, while the acupoints were 3 mm lateral to the acupoints applied in the EA group without electrical output (Figure 1D). No particular therapeutic intervention was applied in the normal and model groups.

Mechanical Withdrawal Threshold Measurement

The mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT) of the intact forepaw was tested at the baseline and on days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, 84, and 112 subsequent to BPAI. The timeline is shown in Figure 2. Prior to the first test, all of the rats were trained for 5 days per week for 2 weeks.

Figure 2

Timeline of the protocol. The diagram showed the timeline of brachial plexus avulsion injury (BPAI) modeling, mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT) measurements, electroacupuncture (EA) treatment, and PET/CT scans over the 112-day experiment. The MWT measurements of the left (intact) forepaw were conducted at baseline and on days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, 84, and 112, respectively, following global BPAI of the right side. 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of the rats’ brains were performed on days 28, 84, and 112 following BPAI. The pink shadow area indicated the intervention duration of electroacupuncture (EA) or sham EA.

Abbreviations: MWT, mechanical withdrawal threshold; BPAI, brachial plexus avulsion injury; 18F-FDG, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; PET/CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography; BPAI = brachial plexus avulsion injury.

Before testing, each rat was placed in an isolated clear plastic cage on an elevated mesh platform (0.6 cm × 0.6 cm) for 20 mins for acclimation. The MWT was assessed with von Frey filaments (Stoelting Co., USA). Stepwise upgrading filaments were applied perpendicularly to the lateral plantar surface of the intact forepaw with sufficient force for 6–8 s, according to the method described by Chaplan et al.22 A positive response was described as an onset of forepaw withdrawal.23 The lowest force that triggered a positive response was recorded as the result. Testing with filament each scale was repeated 5 times. If the rat showed at least two positive responses, the filament bending force was recorded as the MWT. If the response was negative, the filament with the next-higher bending force was then applied.

18F-FDG PET/CT Scan

18F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed at the end of the fourth, twelfth, and sixteenth weeks following global BPAI (Figure 2). To enhance the brain absorption of the tracers, all of the rats were fasted overnight before scanning. An injection of 0.5 m Ci 18F-FDG was administered through the tail vein, and the rats were maintained for 30 mins for tracer distribution and noise control. The rats were then placed on a PET/CT R4 bed (Siemens Inc., USA) in a prone position. During scanning, each rat was stabilised using a cellophane tape and anesthetised with halothane gas (an induction dose of 5% and a maintenance dose of 1.5%). Attenuation correction and anatomical delineation were performed. The images were acquired with a 128×128 matrix, recombined in OSEM3D mode. Brain images of cross-sectional, coronal, and sagittal views were obtained. The PET/CT acquisition parameters were as follows: spherical tube voltage = 80 kV, current = 500 μA, and time = 492 s.

Data Processing

All of the image processing procedures and analyses were performed with Statistical Parametric Mapping 8 (SPM8) toolbox () based on the MATLAB 2014a platform (MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). First, the raw DICOM format of the PET/CT images was converted into a NIFTI format using ImageJ software (Image Processing and Analysis in Java, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Second, the voxels were upscaled by a factor of 10, which was adequate for the SPM8 algorithm.24 The PET/CT images were reformatted to isometric voxels (2 × 2 × 2 mm3) and normalised to the standard template. Finally, the images were smoothed with a Gaussian kernel of 4 mm (full width at half maximum) of twice as the voxel size.

Statistical Analysis

SPSS 22.0 software (SPSS Inc.) was used for the data analysis. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (95% confidence interval). Repetitive measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse the MWT data at different time points, followed by the least significant difference (LSD) post hoc test between two groups. Two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

After raw data preprocessing, a two-sample t-test was used to calculate changes of standard uptake values (SUVs) among different groups at the end of the fourth, twelfth, and sixteenth weeks following global BPAI with a significance level of p = 0.005.

Results

All of the rats were in a normal active condition before BPAI. After C4–T1 laminectomy, the rats showed complete paralysis of their right forepaws. No obvious abnormal foraging activity or no infections were observed, while ptosis and concave eyeballs (positive sign of Horner’s syndrome) were visible (). Half of the rats in the model and sham-EA groups showed autotomic behaviour of biting their toes ( and ).

There was no significant difference among the 4 groups at the baseline (p>0.05). After BPAI, the MWT of the rats’ left (intact) forepaws sharply decreased in the model, sham EA, and EA groups, gradually increased to a certain degree, and lasted throughout the remaining observational process.

During the 112-day observation, the MWT of the left (intact) forepaws in the normal group was significantly higher than that in the model group (p<0.001). Since day 14 post-BPAI, the MWT of the left (intact) forepaws in the EA group started to increase and was significantly higher than that in the sham EA group, and lasted until day 112 (day 14, p<0.05; days 21–112, p<0.001). No significant difference was found between the sham EA and model groups during the observation (p>0.05) (Figure 3 and Table 1).

Figure 3

Mechanical withdrawal threshold of the intact forepaw in the four groups. There was no significant difference among the normal, model, sham EA, and EA groups at the baseline (p>0.05). After BPAI, the MWT of the left (intact) forepaws sharply decreased in the model, sham EA, and EA groups, gradually increased to a certain degree and lasted throughout the remaining observational process. During the 112-day observation, the MWT of the left (intact) forepaw in the normal group was significantly higher than that in the model group (p<0.001). Since day 14 post-BPAI, the MWT of the left (intact) forepaw in the EA group started to increase and was significantly higher than that in the sham EA group, and lasted until day 112 (day 14, p<0.05; days 21–112, p<0.001). No significant difference was found between the sham EA and model groups during the observation (p>0.05). The points and bars showed mean and standard deviation. The dotted line indicated when establishing the model of BPAI. The pink shadow area represented the duration of EA/sham EA intervention. **Indicated significant differences between the normal and model groups at the same time point (p<0.001). # and ##Indicated significant differences between the EA and sham EA groups at the same time point (#, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.001).

Abbreviations: EA, electroacupuncture; BPAI, brachial plexus avulsion injury; MWT, mechanical withdrawal threshold.

Table 1

Results of Mechanical Withdrawal Threshold (MWT) of the Non-Injured (Left) Forepaw in Four Groups at Different Timepoints Following BPAI (g) (Mean ± SD (95% CI))

Group	Normal	Model	Sham EA	EA
Baseline	12.88±1.21 (11.87,13.88)	13.54±0.59 (13.05,14.03)	12.91±0.77 (12.27,13.56)	13.17±0.47 (12.77,13.56)
Day 3	12.88±0.82 (12.19,13.56)	4.58±0.56 (4.12,5.05) **	4.67±0.36 (4.37,4.96)	4.50±0.47 (4.11,4.89)
Day 7	12.58±1.22 (11.56,13.60)	4.50±0.31 (4.24,4.76) **	4.42±0.50 (4.00,4.83)	4.42±0.50 (4.00,4.83)
Day 14	12.58±1.22 (11.56,13.60)	4.33±0.36 (4.04,4.63) **	4.17±0.47 (3.77,4.56)	5.08±0.50 (4.67,5.50) #
Day 21	13.96±0.86 (13.24,14.68)	4.42±0.50 (4.00,4.83) **	4.50±0.31 (4.24,4.76)	6.67±0.36 (6.37,6.96) ##
Day 28	14.58±0.77 (13.94,15.23)	4.83±0.31 (4.58,5.09) **	5.00±0.36 (4.70,5.30)	6.92±0.35 (6.63,7.21) ##
Day 56	14.58±0.77 (13.94,15.23)	5.08±0.35 (4.80,5.37) **	5.33±0.36 (5.04,5.63)	7.67±0.71 (7.07,8.26) ##
Day 84	14.79±0.59 (14.30,15.28)	5.17±0.31 (4.91,5.42) **	5.83±0.47 (5.44,6.23)	7.91±0.66 (7.36,8.47) ##
Day 112	14.79±0.59 (14.30,15.28)	5.08±0.35 (4.79,5.37) **	5.67±0.36 (5.37,5.96)	7.83±0.59 (7.34,8.33) ##

Notes: **Indicated significant differences between the normal and model groups at the same time point (p<0.001). # and ##Indicated significant differences between the EA and sham EA groups at the same time point (#, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.001).

Abbreviations: BPAI, brachial plexus avulsion injury; EA, electroacupuncture; CI, confidence interval.

Brain Metabolism

Comparisons between the normal and model groups and between the sham EA and EA groups were as follows:

(1) Sensorimotor-related brain regions: During the 112-day observation, the 18F-FDG uptake value in the model group continuously decreased in the right somatosensory cortex, compared with the normal group (, and , , and ). Compared with the sham EA group, the 18F-FDG uptake increased in the right somatosensory and motor cortices (contralateral to the intact limb) in the EA group on day 28 (4 weeks) (Figure 4A and Table 2). On day 84 (12 weeks), 18F-FDG uptake increased in the bilateral somatosensory cortices and decreased in the bilateral motor cortices (Figure 4B and Table 2). On day 112 (16weeks), 18F-FDG uptake increased in the superior colliculus and dorsolateral thalamus and decreased in the left somatosensory cortex (Figure 4C and Table 2).

Figure 4

Main brain regions showing significant differences in the 18F-FDG uptake value between the EA and the sham EA groups (EA vs sham EA) on days 28 (A), 84 (B), and 112 (C) after global BPAI. L = left hemisphere; EA = electroacupuncture; BPAI = brachial plexus avulsion injury; 18F-FDG = 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose. The warm colour indicated significantly higher 18F-FDG uptake in the EA group than that in the sham EA group, while the cold colour indicated a significantly lower 18F-FDG uptake in the EA group. Axial brain slices were showed in three columns on the right and slice number were labeled at bottom right.

Table 2

Brain Regions of Significant Metabolism Changes on Days 28, 84, and 112 After Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injury (BPAI) of Electroacupuncture (EA) Group Compared with Sham Electroacupuncture (Sham EA) Group (P<0.005)

Timeline	Metabolism changes EA-group vs sham-EA group	Brain regions	MNI coordinates			Extent	t-value
			x	y	z
Sensorimotor related regions
Day 28	Positive	R_Cortex_Somatosensory	44	30	-33	1253	6.114
		R_Cortex_Motor	42	26	-63	323	5.942
Day 84	Positive	R_Cortex_Somatosensory	54	17	-57	258	4.498
		L_Cortex_Somatosensory	-61	22	-37	81	4.279
	Negative	R_Cortex_Motor	9	26	-43	40	-3.908
		L_Cortex_Motor	-42	26	-75	31	-3.786
Day 112	Positive	L_Superior_Colliculus	-24	1	21	340	7.396
		R_Thalamus_Midline_Dorsal	9	-3	-31	152	9.483
		L_Thalamus_Dorsolateral	-30	-3	1	126	4.673
	Negative	L_Cortex_Somatosensory	-61	7	-39	145	-5.509
Pain-related regions
Day 28	Negative	R_Periaqueductal_Grey	5	-7	19	219	-4.578
		L_Periaqueductal_Grey	-3	-7	23	120	-6.988
Day 84	Positive	R_Cortex_Cingulate	9	15	-61	17	3.336
	Negative	R_Cortex_Insular	71	-20	-33	9	-3.365
		L_Cortex_Insular	-67	-17	-33	3	-3.245
Day112	Positive	R_Cortex_Insular	50	-17	-73	2	3.095
		L_Cortex_Insular	-67	-23	-41	1	3.026
Emotion and cognition related brain regions
Day 28	Positive	R_Cortex_Medial_Prefrontal	3	3	-75	87	3.936
		R_Cortex_Orbitofrontal	28	11	-93	55	3.689
	Negative	L_Hippocampus_Ventral	-42	-32	11	106	-4.645
Day 84	Positive	L_Cortex_Medial_Prefrontal	-11	-7	-75	101	4.467
		L_Cortex_Orbitofrontal	-28	7	-95	38	5.522
		R_Hippocampus_Ventral	50	-20	5	37	3.765
	Negative	R_Amygdala	36	-38	-19	38	-4.499
Day112	Positive	L_Hippocampus_Subiculum	-52	-7	25	246	4.927
		R_Cortex_Retrosplenial	15	34	29	47	3.547
		R_Hippocampus_Postero_Dorsal	48	-5	13	39	4.168
	Negative	L_Hippocampus_Ventral	-26	-44	1	122	-4.059
		L_Cortex_Orbitofrontal	-36	-1	-77	39	-3.485

Notes: Positive indicated EA group > sham EA group, and negative indicated EA group < sham EA group.

(2) Pain-related brain regions: Compared with the normal group, lower 18F-FDG uptake value were noted in bilateral insular cortices in the model group during the observation (, and , , and ). Compared with the sham EA group, 18F-FDG uptake decreased in the bilateral periaqueductal grey matter in the EA group on day 28 (4 weeks) (Figure 4A and Table 2). On day 84 (12 weeks), 18F-FDG increased in the cingulate cortex and decreased in the bilateral insular (Table 2). On day 112 (16weeks), 18F-FDG uptake increased in the bilateral insular (Table 2).

(3) Emotion- and cognition-related brain regions: Compared with the normal group, lower 18F-FDG uptake values were noted in right dorsal posterior hippocampus in the model group during the observation. Higher 18F-FDG uptake values were observed in the orbitofrontal cortex on day 28 (4 weeks) and 84 (12 weeks), while lower 18F-FDG uptake values were seen on day 112 (16 weeks) (, and , , and ). Compared with the sham EA group, 18F-FDG uptake increased in the right medial prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices and decreased in the left ventral hippocampus in the EA group on day 28 (4 weeks) (Figure 4A and Table 2). On day 84 (12 weeks), 18F-FDG increased in the medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and ventral hippocampus, and decreased in the right amygdala (Figure 4B and Table 2). On day 112 (16 weeks), 18F-FDG uptake increased in the dorsolateral thalamus, retrosplenial cortex, and posterior dorsal hippocampus, and decreased in the orbitofrontal cortex and ventral hippocampus (Figure 4C and Table 2).

The metabolism results at all of the time points between either group were included in the supplementary materials ( and ).

Discussion

Chronic pain is a multidimensional experience that continually affects the sensory, motor, emotional, cognitive, and other functions.25–27 Neuropathic pain following BPAI is one of the most intractable types of chronic pain.28–31 Studies have demonstrated that abnormal brain activity is an important aspect of its occurrence/persistence and might be associated with its severity.32,33 Therefore, interventions that change brain plasticity may be potentially helpful for relieving neuropathic pain.

Acupuncture is a popular technique in traditional Chinese medicine for various dysfunctions.34,35 Its combined use with electrical output (EA) has been increasingly applied for the treatment of inflammatory pain.31 EA stimulation at a frequency of 2/15 Hz is commonly used for the treatment of chronic pain. Chen et al applied 2/15 EA stimulation in bilateral “Jiaji” acupoints in chronic constriction injury rats.36 Wang et al used 2/15 Hz EA stimulation in “Zusanli” (ST 36) and “Yanglingquan” (GB 34) in rats with chronic constrictive injury (CCI) to observe the accumulative analgesic effect of EA.37 In addition, 2/15 Hz EA was also reported for treating other types of pain. Feng et al used 2/15 Hz EA stimulation in a rat model of post-laparotomy pain.38 Zou et al applied 2/15 Hz EA stimulation in “jiaji” acupoints of rabbits to treat lumbar disc degeneration.39 For these reasons, 2/15 Hz was used in the present study. But the mechanism underlying the analgesic effects of 2/15 Hz EA on chronic pain might be complicated. There have studies showing that opioid substances were involved in the acupuncture analgesia.40 Han et al reported that the analgesic effect of 2 Hz EA was related with increased release of endomorphin (EM), but 100 Hz EA did not.41 However, one study proposed that the mechanism of 2/15 Hz EA in the treatment of post-laparotomy pain was potentially related to an opioid-independent pathway.38 The expression of pMEK1 in the hypothalamus was gradually down-regulated following continuous intervention of 2/15Hz EA and the effect was time dependent and cumulative.42

In the behavioural assessment, MWT was used to detect mechanical allodynia, which has been frequently used in the sensation tests following brachial plexus nerve, median, and ulnar nerves, and sciatic nerve injuries in previous studies.43–46 BPAI-induced pain in the injured forelimb subsequently caused central sensitisation and facilitation of pain sensation.47 In the present sensory tests, the mechanical threshold of the intact forepaw was measured to quantitatively measure neuropathic pain following BPAI.44 This was because the sensorimotor function of the affected limb completely lost after BPAI. Studies have demonstrated hypersensitisation in the intact limbs following BPAI and the pain threshold decreased. Application of EA on the cervical “Jiaji” EX-C5, EX-C6, and EX-C7 point can relieve this hypersensitisation. The pain threshold of the intact forepaws was significantly elevated and the effect persisted until 4 weeks after the intervention ceased.

In our preliminary study, recovery of sensory function following sciatic nerve injury-repair also improved after the application of EA. Synchronised activation was found in the somatosensory and pain-related brain areas using small animal fMRI.48 We also used small animal PET/CT to explore metabolism in the brain-related BPAI-induced neuropathic pain.19 In the present study, the changes of brain in EA-treated neuropathic pain rats were detected using PET/CT scans. Both the immediate and aftereffects of the metabolic mechanisms were investigated.

The 18F-FDG uptake values in brain regions including the bilateral somatosensory and motor cortices were observed in the EA group. Metabolism particularly increased in the right somatosensory cortex. This suggested that the application of EA increased the activity of the sensorimotor cortex corresponding to the intact limbs. The enhancement of the intact limb cortex compensated the function of affected limbs. EA can also regulate the pain-related regions, bilateral periaqueductal grey matter, and insular cortex. This post-effect of EA also continued until 4 weeks after the intervention ceased.

With the progress in neuroanatomy, sensory neuropsychology, functional imaging, and brain science, neuropathic pain has been proved to be related to different psychophysiological processes, such as sensorimotor, cognition, and emotion.49 De Ridder et al showed that neuropathic pain was associated with plasticity of the somatosensory cortex.32 Flor et al reported that neuropathic pain due to amputation was related to expansion of the adjacent region,12,50 which was consistent with our previous research.19,51 Studies also revealed that cortical changes were not restricted to the sensorimotor cortex, but also an involved extensive range of areas, including the thalamus, anterior insula, and others.52–54 The thalamus is the main relay of sensory and spinal nerve pathways (spinothalamic tract), which is important for the development of deafferentation pain. Evidence suggested that neuropathic pain usually occurred in areas of hypesthesia, and therefore thalamic hypoactivity might be the result of sensory deafferentation.55 In the present study, we also noted that BPAI-induced neuropathic pain and the effect of EA were related to metabolic changes in the brain regions governing sensorimotor, pain, emotion, and cognition functions.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated the beneficial effects of EA for relieving BPAI-induced neuropathic pain in rats. These effects may persist for 4 weeks after the cessation of intervention. In the BPAI rats, decreased metabolism was noted in extended brain areas related to sensorimotor, pain, emotion, and recognition. EA intervention might inhibit maladaptive plasticity in brain areas governing multidimensional functions, especially in sensorimotor and cognition-related cortices. However, the effect of sham EA on brain activity was divergent and inconsistent.