| Literature DB >> 32273529 |
Ahmed A M El-Reedy1, N K Soliman2.
Abstract
Different novel class="Chemical">1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b][1,2,4,5]tetrazines andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32273529 PMCID: PMC7145827 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62977-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Synthesis of triazolotriazine derivatives 5–8.
Figure 2Synthesis of triazolotetrazine derivatives 10–14.
The antibacterial activity for some of the newly prepared Compounds.
| Bacteria | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | 25 | 50 | 100 | MIC | 25 | 50 | 100 | MIC | 25 | 50 | 100 | Inhibitory |
| Growth inhibition Zone (mm)* | Compounds | |||||||||||
| 75.7 | — | — | 21 | 49.6 | — | 8 | 28 | 38.6 | — | 17 | 28 | 5a |
| 48.5 | — | 9 | 23 | 68 | — | — | 26 | 44.3 | — | 15 | 31 | 5b |
| 49.6 | — | 5 | 20 | 49.7 | — | 8 | 33 | 32 | — | 20 | 29 | 5c |
| 48.9 | — | 8 | 18 | 46.9 | — | 11 | 30 | 31.7 | — | 22 | 32 | 5d |
| 68.2 | — | — | 19 | 47.9 | — | 10 | 22 | 38.3 | — | 15 | 24 | 8a |
| 67.2 | — | — | 24 | 79.6 | — | — | 20 | 37.3 | — | 17 | 27 | 8b |
| 46.9 | — | 10 | 22 | 43.3 | — | 11 | 19 | 26.6 | — | 19 | 24 | 8c |
| 48.4 | — | 9 | 24 | 79.5 | — | — | 17 | 44.6 | — | 14 | 29 | 8d |
| 68.7 | — | — | 21 | 49 | — | 6 | 25 | 42.6 | — | 15 | 28 | 9a |
| 46.6 | — | 11 | 25 | 61.3 | — | — | 22 | 44.5 | — | 13 | 26 | 9b |
| 75.1 | — | — | 23 | 75.4 | — | — | 21 | 45.5 | — | 13 | 28 | 10a |
| 49.5 | — | 7 | 22 | 45 | — | 10 | 20 | 45.7 | — | 12 | 25 | 10b |
| 66.5 | — | — | 22 | 43.8 | — | 9 | 14 | 25.7 | — | 14 | 29 | 11a |
| 48.2 | — | 8 | 19 | 40.4 | — | 11 | 17 | 43.8 | — | 16 | 32 | 11b |
| 75.3 | — | — | 14 | 44.4 | — | 11 | 20 | 44.6 | — | 14 | 29 | 12a |
| 39.5 | — | 10 | 15 | 53.5 | — | — | 25 | 38.7 | — | 16 | 26 | 12b |
| 61.7 | — | — | 19 | 49.3 | — | 8 | 23 | 30.3 | — | 16 | 22 | 13a |
| 37.2 | — | 11 | 16 | 49 | — | 9 | 26 | 45.2 | — | 13 | 27 | 13b |
| 73.6 | — | — | 13 | 47.7 | — | 10 | 25 | 44.5 | — | 12 | 24 | 14a |
| 31.6 | — | 10 | 13 | 49.6 | — | 8 | 28 | 43.7 | — | 14 | 27 | 14b |
| 23.3 | 6 | 26 | 31 | 45.3 | — | 10 | 20 | — | — | — | — | Nalidixic acid |
| 14.2 | 17 | 20 | 26 | 15.9 | 14 | 19 | 23 | 13.9 | 18 | 22 | 28 | Imipenem |
The antifungal activity for some of the newly prepared Compounds.
| Fungi | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 50 | 100 | Inhibitory Concentrations |
| Growth inhibition Zone (mm)* | Compounds | ||
| — | — | 14 | 5a |
| — | — | 17 | 5b |
| — | — | 16 | 5c |
| — | — | 14 | 5d |
| — | — | 13 | 8a |
| — | — | 14 | 8b |
| — | — | 16 | 8c |
| — | — | 14 | 8d |
| — | — | 12 | 9a |
| — | — | 11 | 9b |
| — | — | 13 | 10a |
| — | — | 12 | 10b |
| — | — | 12 | 11a |
| — | — | 14 | 11b |
| — | — | 12 | 12a |
| — | — | 10 | 12b |
| — | — | 11 | 13a |
| — | — | 13 | 13b |
| — | — | 12 | 14a |
| — | — | 11 | 14b |
| — | — | 40 | Nystatin |
• Synthesized compounds (Inhibitor) Concentrations: 100, 50 and 25 μg /mL.
Highly active: DIZ ≥ 12.
Moderately active: DIZ = 9–12.
Slightly active: DIZ = 6–9;
Not sensitive: DIZ < 6 mm.
Figure 3The antibacterial activity comparison of some tested compounds with Nalidixic acid and Imipenem toward E. coli at different concentrations where: (A) 25 µg/mL (B) 50 µg/mL (C) 100 µg/mL.
Figure 6The antifungal activity comparison of some tested compounds with Nystatin toward C. albicans at different concentrations where: (A) 25 µg/mL (B) 50 µg/mL (C) 100 µg/mL.
The anti-inflammatory activity for some of the newly synthesized compounds.
| Compound | Dose (mg /Kg) | Paw edema(g)* ± S.E. | % inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9a | 25 5 | 0.57 ± 0.05 0.61 ± 0.06 | 13.63 7.57 |
| 9b | 25 5 | 0.52 ± 0.05 0.59 ± 0.06 | 21.21 10.60 |
| 10a | 25 5 | 0.42 ± 0.05 0.48 ± 0.06 | 36.36 27.27 |
| 10b | 25 5 | 0.45 ± 0.05 0.49 ± 0.06 | 31.81 25.75 |
| 12a | 25 5 | 0.41 ± 0.03 0.48 ± 0.06 | 37.87 27.27 |
| 12b | 25 5 | 0.43 ± 0.05 0.47 ± 0.06 | 34.84 28.78 |
| 13a | 25 5 | 0.55 ± 0.05 0.64 ± 0.05 | 16.66 3.03 |
| 13b | 25 5 | 0.40 ± 0.05 0.46 ± 0.06 | 39.39 30.30 |
| Control | 0 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | 0 |
| Indomethacin | 5 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 51.51 |
*Significant difference from the control value at p < 0.05.
Molecular modeling results for compound 5d and Nalidixic acid during docking in DNA Gyrase enzyme (PDB ID: 2XCT) active site.
| Compound | COX-2 (PDB: 2XCT) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity | Distance (in Å) from | Functional | Interaction | 2d caption(3d caption) | ||
| −14.2589 | 1.62 3.95 4.76 3.93 3.73 | Mn Arg458 DG5 DA13 DA13 | Pyridine N Diazine ring Phenyl ring Triazole ring Triazole ring | Metal Bond pi-H pi-H pi-pi pi-pi | Fig. (Fig. | |
| Nalidixic acid | −10.0699 | 1.71 3.99 3.67 | Mn DG5 DG5 | Carbonyl group Phenyl ring Phenyl ring | Metal Bond pi-pi pi-pi | Fig. (Fig. |
Figure 7Molecular docked model of compound 5d and Nalidixic acid with DNA Gyrase enzyme (the target is presented as thin sticks; the ligands are drawn as ball-and-stick). Images (a,c) represent the 2D docking styles for DNA Gyrase enzyme with compound 5d and Nalidixic acid, respectively. Images (b,d) represent the 3D docking styles for compound 5d and Nalidixic acid, respectively.
Molecular modeling results for compounds and Indomethacin during docking in COX-2 (PDB ID: 1CX2) active site.
| Compound | COX-2 (PDB: 1CX2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity | Distance (in Å) from | Functional | Interaction | 2d caption | ||
| 10a | −17.8710 | 4.47 | Arg513 | Triazole ring | pi-cation | Fig. (Fig. |
| 10b | −16.1990 | 2.47 3.71 | Tyr355 Ser353 | Triazole N Pyridine ring | H-acceptor pi-H | Fig. (Fig. |
| 12a | −15.3810 | 3.23 3.80 3.56 | Leu352 Val523His90 | -NH- Phenyl ring Triazole ring | H-donor pi-H pi-pi | Fig. (Fig. |
| 12b | −16.2058 | 3.86 3.37 | Tyr355 Ala527 | -NH- Triazole ring | H-acceptor pi-H | Fig. (Fig. |
| Indomethacin | −15.8796 | 2.70 | Arg513 | Carbonyl | H-acceptor | Fig. (Fig. |
Figure 8Molecular docked model of compounds 10a,b, 12a,b and Indomethacin with COX–II enzyme (the target is presented as thin sticks; the ligands are drawn as ball-and-stick). Images (a,c,e,g,i) represent the 2D docking styles for COX–II enzyme with compounds 10a,b, 12a,b and Indomethacin, respectively. Images (b,d,f,h,j) represent the 3D docking styles for COX–II enzyme with compounds 10a,b, 12a,b and Indomethacin, respectively.