Literature DB >> 32273291

Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of gallbladder cancer: a hospital-based case-control study.

Jianping Xiong1, Yaqin Wang2, Guang Chen1, Long Jin3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  gallbladder cancer; proton pump inhibition

Year:  2020        PMID: 32273291      PMCID: PMC7677475          DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


× No keyword cloud information.
We read with great interest the article by Chuang et al 1 confirming proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is associated with increased risk of cholecystitis.1 PPIs are a potent class of agents used to suppress gastric acid secretion and are among the most commonly prescribed medications globally.2 Presently, PPIs are routinely recommended for several GI disorders, including GORD, and as prophylaxis against peptic ulcer disease and GI bleeding in susceptible populations, such as individuals on dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.3–5 In view of the large population of patients receiving PPI therapy, in many cases long-term therapy, ensuring the safety of PPI therapy is of considerable public health importance.6 Recently, PPIs have been reported to be associated with cholecystitis and might possibly be carcinogenic.1 However, no research has been conducted to investigate the association of PPIs with gallbladder cancer (GBC). Herein, a hospital-based case–control study was carried out in China to explore the association between PPIs and GBC risk. A hospital-based case–control study was performed by enrolling 3030 subjects (606 subjects with pathologically diagnosed GBC as well as 2424 healthy controls) from the Beijing Friendship Hospital of the Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, from February 2002 to October 2018. Differences in PPI use were compared between the GBC and control groups. Cases were frequency-matched 1 to 4 with controls (without a history of GBC) in the Health Screening Center of Beijing Friendship Hospital from May 2012 through January 2019 for age, sex and history of gallstone. Both study groups excluded individuals receiving cholecystectomy prior to the index date. In this case–control study, 44 of 606 (7.3%) patients with GBC and 109 of 2424 (4.5%) controls have been exposed to PPI 28 cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) (table 1). When comparing ever users of PPI with non-PPI users, we found PPI use was associated with 1.56-fold elevated GBC risk (p<0.0001) (OR=1.56, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.19; p=0.005) (table 2). Next, we determined the impact of dose and duration of PPI use on GBC risk (table 2). The ORs were 1.42 (95% CI 0.80 to 2.41), 1.67 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.76) and 2.69 (95% CI 1.15 to 7.28) in the 28–90, 91–180 and 180+ cDDD groups, respectively, compared with the ≤27 cDDD group (table 2). In considering the use of PPI according to cDDD subgroups, the risk significantly increased, and the highest dose–response effect was found in patients with PPI exposure of 180+ cDDD groups (p for trend <0.0001) (table 2). When stratified by duration of PPI use as >3 years or ≤3 years, the ORs were 1.79 (95% CI 1.03 to 3.10) and 2.41 (1.05 to 4.93) for PPI use of >3 years and ≤3 years, respectively (table 2).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of GBC cases and controls

CharacteristicsGBC, n=606 (%)Controls, n=2424 (%)P value*
Age (years)0.955
 <60226 (32.3)907 (37.4)
 ≥60380 (62.7)1517 (62.6)
Sex
 Male195 (32.1)781 (32.2)
 Female411 (67.9)1643 (67.8)0.984
Gallstones119 (19.7)480 (19.8)0.927
Infectious diseases
 HBV59 (9.7)104 (4.3)<0.001
 HCV27 (4.5)41 (1.7)<0.001
Fatty liver disease75 (12.4)191 (7.9)<0.001
Alcohol intake156 (25.8)393 (16.2)<0.001
Smoking204 (33.6)448 (18.5)<0.001
Diabetes mellitus123 (20.3)187 (7.7)0.002
Dyslipoproteinaemia176 (29.0)373 (15.4)<0.001
Hypertension78 (12.9)347 (14.3)0.36
Obesity138 (22.7)330 (13.6)<0.001
Coronary artery disease134 (22.1)625 (25.8)0.062
Aspirin use142 (23.5)926 (38.2)<0.001
PPI use44 (7.3)109 (4.5)0.005
Duration of use (years)
 ≤319 (3.1)43 (1.8)0.034
 <39 (1.5)15 (0.6)0.031
Dose (cDDD)
 0–27562 (92.7)2291 (95.5)
 28–9015 (2.5)45 (1.9)0.219
 91–18023 (3.8)55 (2.3)0.036
 >1806 (1.0)7 (0.3)0.018

*P value for difference between total GBC cases and controls.

cDDD, cumulative defined daily dose; GBC, gallbladder cancer; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.

Table 2

OR and 95% CI of GBC associated with PPI use and other covariates

VariablesOR (95% CI)P value
Infectious diseases
 HBV2.31 (1.72 to 3.25)*<0.001
 HCV2.65 (1.44 to 4.36)*<0.001
Fatty liver disease1.63 (1.20 to 2.03)*<0.001
Alcohol intake1.68 (1.44 to 2.19)*<0.001
Smoking2.23 (1.84 to 2.73)*<0.001
Diabetes mellitus2.54 (1.87 to 3.41)*0.002
Dyslipoproteinaemia2.15 (1.72 to 2.66)*<0.001
Hypertension0.88 (0.67 to 1.15)0.36
Obesity2.12 (1.68 to 2.46)*<0.001
Coronary artery disease0.81 (0.56 to 1.15)0.062
Aspirin use0.49 (0.38 to 0.63)*<0.001
PPI use1.56 (1.07 to 2.19)*0.005
Duration of use (years)
 ≤31.79 (1.03 to 3.10)*0.034
 >32.41 (1.05 to 4.93)*0.031
Dose (cDDD)
 0–27
 28–901.42 (0.80 to 2.41)0.219
 91–1801.67 (1.03 to 2.76)*0.036
 >1802.69 (1.15 to 7.28)*0.018

*Adjusted OR was estimated using conditional logistic regression adjusted for other covariates listed in the table.

cDDD, cumulative defined daily dose; GBC, gallbladder cancer; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.

Baseline characteristics of GBC cases and controls *P value for difference between total GBC cases and controls. cDDD, cumulative defined daily dose; GBC, gallbladder cancer; PPI, proton pump inhibitor. OR and 95% CI of GBC associated with PPI use and other covariates *Adjusted OR was estimated using conditional logistic regression adjusted for other covariates listed in the table. cDDD, cumulative defined daily dose; GBC, gallbladder cancer; PPI, proton pump inhibitor. This observation is biologically plausible as supported by preclinical studies of GBC and other cancers. It is hypothesised that hypochlorhydria induced by daily PPI use produces periods during the day in which the pH of the gastric juice is at or near neutral pH levels.7 8 A study by Shindo et al 7 showed that hypochlorhydria can induce major changes in the gastric flora and affect the pH of small bowel fluid to allow bacterial overgrowth thereby increasing the risk of retrograding to the biliary system and thus elevating the incidence of biliary tract infection,1 and biliary tract infection is a recognised risk factor for GBC.9 Thus, our study may indirectly support the results of Chuang et al 1 that PPI use increased the incidence of cholecystitis.1 In conclusion, this hospital-based case–control study indicates PPI use as a significant risk factor for GBC progression, which seems to be dose-dependent.
  9 in total

1.  Proton pump inhibitors increase the risk of cholecystitis: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Shih-Chieh Chuang; Che-Chen Lin; Cheng-Yuan Peng; Wen-Hsin Huang; Wen-Pang Su; Shih-Wei Lai; Hsueh-Chou Lai
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Rapidly increasing prescribing of proton pump inhibitors in primary care despite interventions: a nationwide observational study.

Authors:  Peter Haastrup; Maja Skov Paulsen; Jon Eik Zwisler; Luise Mølenberg Begtrup; Jane Møller Hansen; Sanne Rasmussen; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Interpreting Reported Risks Associated With Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors: Residual Confounding in a 10-Year Analysis of National Ambulatory Data.

Authors:  Christopher Ma; Abdel Aziz Shaheen; Stephen E Congly; Christopher N Andrews; Paul Moayyedi; Nauzer Forbes
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Primary gallbladder cancer: recognition of risk factors and the role of prophylactic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Sheth; A Bedford; S Chopra
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Omeprazole induces altered bile acid metabolism.

Authors:  K Shindo; M Machida; M Fukumura; K Koide; R Yamazaki
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Clinical practice. Gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Peter Malfertheiner; Francis K L Chan; Kenneth E L McColl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Proton pump inhibitors affect the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Floris Imhann; Marc Jan Bonder; Arnau Vich Vila; Jingyuan Fu; Zlatan Mujagic; Lisa Vork; Ettje F Tigchelaar; Soesma A Jankipersadsing; Maria Carmen Cenit; Hermie J M Harmsen; Gerard Dijkstra; Lude Franke; Ramnik J Xavier; Daisy Jonkers; Cisca Wijmenga; Rinse K Weersma; Alexandra Zhernakova
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Age-specific risks, severity, time course, and outcome of bleeding on long-term antiplatelet treatment after vascular events: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Linxin Li; Olivia C Geraghty; Ziyah Mehta; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Association Between Regular Use of Gastric Acid Suppressants and Subsequent Risk of Cholelithiasis: A Prospective Cohort Study of 0.47 Million Participants.

Authors:  Man Yang; Bin Xia; Yawen Lu; Qiangsheng He; Yanyan Lin; Ping Yue; Bing Bai; Chunlu Dong; Wenbo Meng; Jian Qi; Jinqiu Yuan
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 2.  Hepatitis B and C virus infections and the risk of biliary tract cancers: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Yizhou Wang; Ye Yuan; Dongqing Gu
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.698

3.  Using proton pump inhibitors increases the risk of hepato-biliary-pancreatic cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wence Zhou; Xinlong Chen; Qigang Fan; Haichuan Yu; Wenkai Jiang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.988

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.