| Literature DB >> 32272769 |
Christian B Schimper1, Paul S Pachschwoell1, Hubert Hettegger1, Marie-Alexandra Neouze2, Jean-Marie Nedelec3, Martin Wendland4, Thomas Rosenau1,5, Falk Liebner1,6.
Abstract
Biopolymer aerogels of appropriate open-porous morphology, nanotopology, surface chemistry, and mechanical properties can be promising cell scaffolding materials. Here, we report a facile approach towards the preparation of cellulose phosphate aerogels from two types of cellulosic source materials. Since high degrees of phosphorylation would afford water-soluble products inappropriate for cell scaffolding, products of low DSP (ca. 0.2) were prepared by a heterogeneous approach. Aiming at both i) full preservation of chemical integrity of cellulose during dissolution and ii) utilization of specific phase separation mechanisms upon coagulation of cellulose, TBAF·H2O/DMSO was employed as a non-derivatizing solvent. Sequential dissolution of cellulose phosphates, casting, coagulation, solvent exchange, and scCO2 drying afforded lightweight, nano-porous aerogels. Compared to their non-derivatized counterparts, cellulose phosphate aerogels are less sensitive towards shrinking during solvent exchange. This is presumably due to electrostatic repulsion and translates into faster scCO2 drying. The low DSP values have no negative impact on pore size distribution, specific surface (SBET ≤ 310 m2 g-1), porosity (Π 95.5-97 vol.%), or stiffness (Eρ ≤ 211 MPa cm3 g-1). Considering the sterilization capabilities of scCO2, existing templating opportunities to afford dual-porous scaffolds and the good hemocompatibility of phosphorylated cellulose, TBAF·H2O/DMSO can be regarded a promising solvent system for the manufacture of cell scaffolding materials.Entities:
Keywords: TBAF/DMSO; cellulose phosphate; cellulose phosphate aerogel; interconnected porosity; supercritical carbon dioxide; tetrabutylammonium fluoride
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32272769 PMCID: PMC7181236 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25071695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Phosphorous contents, DSP values (degree of phosphorylation), and selected properties of 3% cellulose phosphate lyogels and aerogels compared to the non-derivatized starting materials. The range of variation represents the 95% confidence interval.
| Sample | P Content | DSP | Shrinking (−) / Swelling (+) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regeneration (EtOH, before Drying) [%] | After scCO2 | Apparent Density [mg cm−3] | |||
| hwPHK | - | - | −16.2 ± 4.9 | −39.1 ± 5.5 | 58.1 ± 3.5 |
| hwPHK-P | 4.91 | 0.24 | +4.0 ± 2.5 | −28.3 ± 6.8 | 47.0 ± 5.8 |
| CL | - | - | −17.8 ± 4.5 | −45.7 ± 6.8 | 71.2 ± 5.0 |
| CL-P | 3.34 | 0.18 | −2.4 ± 2.8 | −31.4 ± 6.7 | 50.0 ± 4.0 |
Figure 1Change in volume of the gels during regeneration in ethanol followed by supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) drying (-P indicates phosphorylated samples). Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval.
DSP values of hwPHK-P (initial DSP = 0.209) after extraction with DMSO or a solution of 16.6 wt.% TBAF in DMSO having a water content of 0.95 wt.% (labeled TBAF/DMSO) at room temperature and for different time periods. The range of variation indicates the 95% confidence interval (n = 3).
| Extraction Medium | Extraction Time [h] | Final DSP | [%] of Initial DSP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMSO (control) | 4 | 0.149 | 71 | ±0.0 |
| TBAF/DMSO | 2 | 0.094 | 45 | ±1.9 |
| 4 | 0.093 | 44 | ±1.2 | |
| 8 | 0.096 | 46 | ±0.0 | |
| 8 (60 °C) | 0.096 | 46 | ±0.0 | |
| 16 | 0.093 | 44 | ±0.5 | |
Figure 2EDAX spectra of aerogels obtained without (A, non-derivatized CL) and after (B, phosphorylated CL) implementing a H2O washing step prior solvent exchange and scCO2 drying.
Figure 3SEM micrographs of the interior (A, C, E, G) and near-surface breaking edge (B, D, F, H) of aerogels from non-derivatized cellulose (CL: A, B; hwPHK: E, F) and their phosphorylated counterparts (CL-P: C, D; hwPHK-P: G, H) at different magnification.
Young’s modulus (E), specific modulus (Eρ), yield strength (σy), and yield stress (εy) as obtained from uniaxial compression testing of the prepared aerogels.
| Sample | σy [MPa] | εy [%] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CL (TBAF/DMSO) | 11.9 | 167 | 5.3 | 3.4 |
| ([EMIM][OAc]/DMSO) a | 1.121 a | 20 a | 2.1 a | n.d. b |
| NMMO⋅H2O a | 4.26 a | 68 a | 2.9 a | n.d. b |
| CL-P | 10.8 | 216 | 3.6 | 5.1 |
| hwPHK | 5.9 | 102 | 5.7 | 7.6 |
| hwPHK-P | 3.2 | 68 | 1.9 | 3.4 |
a data taken from [15], b not determined.
Calculated porosity, results of nitrogen sorption experiments and pore characteristics derived from thermoporosimetry. Numbers in brackets indicate the 95% confidence interval (n = 3).
| Nitrogen Sorption Experiments | Thermoporosimetry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Calculated Porosity [%] | Specific Surface [m2 g−1] | Sorbed Volume [cm3 g−1] | C Constant | Vp PSD [cm3 g−1] | Rp [nm] max PSD |
| CL | 96.28 | 355 (43) | 0.80 (0.20) | 101 (1.0) | 6.06 | 19.19 |
| CL-P | 96.99 | 311 (6.9) | 0.55 (0.10) | 48 (2.0) | 9.27 | 21.23 |
| hwPHK | 95.46 | 366 (2.0) | 0.7 (0) | 104 (2.0) | 7.32 | 19.74 |
| hwPHK-P | 96.80 | 270 (20) | 0.5 (0) | 45 (5.9) | 10.60 | 24.49 |
Figure 4Normalized pore-size distributions as obtained by thermoporosimetry.
Figure 5Weight [%] of the materials recorded over 60 min after scCO2 drying (left). Release of ethanol from freshly scCO2 dried cotton linters aerogels (CL) and bacterial cellulose aerogels (BC) under headspace (80 °C) GC-MS conditions (right).
Volume and weight changes of studied aerogels in dependence on relative humidity and storage time (% of initial mass and volume right after scCO2 drying). Numbers in brackets indicate the 95% confidence interval (n = 4).
| Sample | Conditioning [% RH] | 2 d | 84 d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume [%] | Weight [%] | Volume [%] | Weight [%] | ||
| CL | 0 | 78.7 (1.3) | −4.2 (0.48) | 68.0 (1.6) | −6.7 (0.25) |
| 30 | 72.0 (4.8) | −1.4 (0.06) | 62.6 (5.2) | −1.5 (0.29) | |
| 65 | 30.5 (3.0) | 5.0 (1.0) | 24.7 (2.9) | 5.2 (0.63) | |
| 98 | 10.0 (3.0) | 23.6 (0.53) | 10.4 (5.5) | 25.8 (0.05) | |
| CL-P | 0 | 88.6 (1,4) | −1.7 (0.04) | 78.9 (5.1) | −3.1 (0.13) |
| 65 | 27.4 (1.1) | 6.6 (0.39) | 19.7 (1.7) | 5.8 (0.21) | |
| hwPHK | 0 | 85.6 (11) | −4.8 (0.37) | 76.9 (8.4) | −4.9 (0.36) |
| 30 | 76.0 (6.5) | −0.3 (0.02) | 68.7 (6.2) | −0.7 (0.13) | |
| 65 | 36.3 (0.48) | 5.5 (0.54) | 27.2 (0.13) | 5.4 (0.81) | |
| 98 | 7.1 (0.72) | 24.2 (0.01) | 6.5 (0.08) | 25.0 (0.07) | |
| hwPHK-P | 0 | 95.6 (5.2) | −0.6 (0.01) | 87.6 (4.9) | −1.8 (0.01) |
| 65 | 30.9 (3.3) | 6.1 (0.24) | 21.4 (3.4) | 4.8 (0.17) | |
Figure 6Bulk density [%] of phosphorylated and non-derivatized aerogels after two and 84 days during conditioning at 65% RH (left). Thermogravimetric analysis of cellulose II aerogels from non-derivatized and slightly phosphorylated cotton linters (CL, CL-P) and hardwood prehydrolysis kraft pulp (hwPHK, hwPHK-P). TGA profiles of the unprocessed source materials were recorded for reference purposes (right).