| Literature DB >> 32272569 |
Paulo Eduardo Branco Paiva1, Tânia Cota2, Luís Neto3, Celestino Soares4, José Carlos Tomás4, Amílcar Duarte3.
Abstract
African citrus psyllid (Trioza erytreae (Del Guercio)) is a vector insect of the bacterium Candidatus Liberibacter africanus, the putative causal agent of Huanglongbing, the most devastating citrus disease in the world. The insect was found on the island of Madeira in 1994 and in mainland Portugal in 2015. Present in the north and center of the country, it is a threat to Algarve, the main citrus-producing region. Trioza erytreae eggs and first instar nymphs are sensitive to the combination of high temperatures and low relative humidity. Daily maximum air temperature and minimum relative humidity data from 18 weather stations were used to calculate the water vapor pressure deficit (vpd) from 2004 to 2018 at various locations. Based on the mean vpd and the number of unfavorable days (vpd < 34.5 and vpd < 56 mbar) of two time periods (February to May and June to September), less favorable zones for T. erytreae were identified. The zones with thermal and water conditions like those observed in the Castelo Branco and Portalegre (Center), Beja (Alentejo), Alte, and Norinha (Algarve) stations showed climatic restrictions to the development of eggs and first instar nymphs of African citrus psyllid. Effective control measures, such as the introduction and mass release of Tamarixia dryi (Waterson), a specific parasitoid, and chemical control are necessary in favorable periods for T. erytreae development, such as in spring and in areas with limited or no climate restrictions.Entities:
Keywords: Candidatus Liberibacter africanus; Huanglongbing; Triozidae; abiotic factor limitations; greening
Year: 2020 PMID: 32272569 PMCID: PMC7240426 DOI: 10.3390/insects11040229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Location of the Portuguese Institute of the Sea and Atmosphere (IPMA) and Regional Directorate for Agriculture and Fisheries of Algarve (DRAP Algarve) weather stations and presence of Trioza erytreae in the region.
| Zone | Location | Presence of | Inland | Geographical Coordinates | Altitude | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| or Coast | North-N | West-W | (masl 1) | ||
|
| ||||||
| North | Bragança | inland | 41°48′13,9″ | 06°44′34,2″ | 690 | |
| Montalegre | X | inland | 41°49′22,0″ | 07°47′16,4″ | 1005 | |
| Porto | X | coast | 41°13′56,2″ | 08°40′44,8″ | 69 | |
| Vila Real | X | inland | 41°16′27,1″ | 07°43′01,6″ | 561 | |
| Center | Aveiro | X | coast | 40°38′07,4″ | 08°39′34,6″ | 5 |
| Castelo Branco | inland | 39°50′21,9″ | 07°28′43,3″ | 386 | ||
| Coimbra | X | inland | 40°09′27,4″ | 08°28′06,7″ | 171 | |
| Guarda | inland | 40°31′42,8″ | 07°16′43,2″ | 1020 | ||
| Viseu | inland | 40°42′53,7″ | 07°53′45,3″ | 636 | ||
| Lisbon and Tagus Valley | Portalegre | inland | 39°17′39,1″ | 07°25′16,7″ | 597 | |
| Alentejo | Beja | inland | 38°01′32,6″ | 07°52′02,3″ | 246 | |
| Algarve | Faro | coast | 37°00′59,7″ | 07°58′19,0″ | 8 | |
|
| ||||||
| Atlantic coast | Aljezur | inland | 37°21′24,9″ | 08°46′19,5″ | 91 | |
| Barlavento | Arrochela | inland | 37°10′32,9″ | 08°26′48,1″ | 50 | |
| Norinha | inland | 37°12′19,7″ | 08°24′23,5″ | 15 | ||
| Alte | inland | 37°12′40,8″ | 08°10′54,6″ | 79 | ||
| Sotavento | Patacão | coast | 37°02′48,8″ | 07°56′49,8″ | 13 | |
| Cacela | coast | 37°10′08,6″ | 07°33′08,2’ | 37 | ||
1 Meters above sea level.
Figure 1Portuguese Institute of the Sea and Atmosphere (black circles, IPMA) and Regional Directorate for Agriculture and Fisheries of Algarve (stars, DRAP Algarve) weather stations.
Figure 2Box-plot graphs of mean water vapor pressure deficits in twelve areas of mainland Portugal in the spring (A) (February to May) and summer (B) (June to September) from 2004 to 2018 (ANOVA: February to May, F = 17.04, p < 0.001; June to September, F = 91.00, p < 0.001). Highlighted means with the same letters were not different by Scott–Knott grouping test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Box-plot graphs of mean water vapor pressure deficits in six zones of Algarve in the spring (A) (February to May) and summer (B) (June to September) from 2004 to 2018 (ANOVA: February to May, F = 17.91, p < 0.001; June to September. F = 84.00, p < 0.001). Highlighted means with the same letters were not different by Scott–Knott grouping test (p < 0.05).
Mean number of days with water vapor pressure deficits (vpd) above 34.5 and 56.0 mbar in areas of mainland Portugal in the spring and summer from 2004 to 2018.
| Zone | Location | Spring (February to May) | Summer (June to September) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vpd > 34.5 | Vpd > 56 | Vpd > 34.5 | Vpd > 56 | ||||||
| North | Bragança | 0.6 | c | 0.00 | 37.2 | b | 0.7 | c | |
| Montalegre | 0.1 | c | 0.00 | 8.1 | e | 0.0 | c | ||
| Porto | 0.7 | c | 0.00 | 8.2 | e | 0.1 | c | ||
| Vila Real | 0.9 | c | 0.00 | 28.7 | c | 0.5 | c | ||
| Center | Aveiro | 0.7 | c | 0.00 | 4.9 | f | 0.2 | c | |
| Castelo Branco | 2.3 | b | 0.00 | 65.7 | a | 6.1 | b | ||
| Coimbra | 1.6 | c | 0.00 | 15.9 | d | 1.1 | c | ||
| Guarda | 0.0 | c | 0.00 | 15.3 | d | 0.0 | c | ||
| Viseu | 0.4 | c | 0.00 | 26.7 | c | 0.6 | c | ||
| Lisbon and Tagus Valley | Portalegre | 2.3 | b | 0.00 | 54.4 | a | 4.5 | b | |
| Alentejo | Beja | 4.2 | a | 0.10 | 58.6 | a | 9.5 | a | |
| Algarve | Faro | 1.1 | c | 0.00 | 17.3 | d | 0.5 | c | |
| deviance | 185.41 2 | 2551.20 2 | 632.22 2 | ||||||
| p-valor | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
| Algarve | |||||||||
| Atlantic coast | Aljezur | 2.2 | b | 0.0 | a | 11.8 | f | 0.8 | d |
| Barlavento | Arrochela | 2.9 | b | 0.1 | a | 51.8 | c | 5.3 | b |
| Norinha | 5.1 | a | 0.1 | a | 61.2 | b | 6.2 | b | |
| Alte | 7.3 | a | 0.1 | a | 69.4 | a | 9.3 | a | |
| Sotavento | Patacão | 1.8 | b | 0.1 | a | 32.3 | e | 1.7 | cd |
| Cacela | 2.9 | b | 0.1 | a | 43.8 | d | 3.1 | c | |
| F | 7.05 1 | 100.73 1 | |||||||
| deviance | 2.77 2 | 178.36 2 | |||||||
| p-value | <0.001 | 0.735 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
1 Analysis of variance by the F test and means followed by the same letter in the column did not differ according to the Scott–Knott clustering test (p < 0.05). 2 Deviance analyses with generalized linear models and means followed by the same letter in the column did not differ by the generalized Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Distribution map of Trioza erytreae in mainland Portugal. The delimitation of the “Infested Zone” is based on the civil parishes where T. erytreae was detected. A “buffer zone” was added to this zone, surrounding a 3 km radius considering the flight capacity of the insect. A “Surveillance Zone” of 10 km radius was also defined around the Demarcated Zone (Infested Area + Buffer Zone). Available online by the General Directorate of Food and Veterinary of the Portuguese Ministry of Agriculture [4] (http://www.dgv.min-agricultura.pt/portal/page/portal/DGV/genericos?generico=221911&cboui=221911).