| Literature DB >> 32272333 |
Hitten P Zaveri1, Björn Schelter2, Catherine A Schevon3, Premysl Jiruska4, John G R Jefferys5, Gregory Worrell6, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage7, Rasesh B Joshi8, Viktor Jirsa9, Marc Goodfellow10, Christian Meisel11, Klaus Lehnertz12.
Abstract
Debates on six controversial topics on the network theory of epilepsy were held during two debate sessions, as part of the International Conference for Technology and Analysis of Seizures, 2019 (ICTALS 2019) convened at the University of Exeter, UK, September 2-5 2019. The debate topics were (1) From pathologic to physiologic: is the epileptic network part of an existing large-scale brain network? (2) Are micro scale recordings pertinent for defining the epileptic network? (3) From seconds to years: do we need all temporal scales to define an epileptic network? (4) Is it necessary to fully define the epileptic network to control it? (5) Is controlling seizures sufficient to control the epileptic network? (6) Does the epileptic network want to be controlled? This article, written by the organizing committee for the debate sessions and the debaters, summarizes the arguments presented during the debates on these six topics.Entities:
Keywords: Edges; Epileptic network; Epileptogenesis; Ictogenesis; Nodes; Seizure control
Year: 2020 PMID: 32272333 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.03.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Seizure ISSN: 1059-1311 Impact factor: 3.184