Literature DB >> 32271498

Prognosis and Management of BRAF V600E-Mutated Pregnancy-Associated Melanoma.

Dimitrios C Ziogas1, Panagiotis Diamantopoulos1, Olga Benopoulou1, Amalia Anastasopoulou1, Dimitrios Bafaloukos2, Alexander J Stratigos3, John M Kirkwood4, Helen Gogas1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately one third of women who develop melanoma at childbearing age are diagnosed during gestation or the postpartum period, facing pregnancy-associated melanoma (PAM). However, only some retrospective studies with heterogeneous data have analyzed the impact of pregnancy on melanoma development, and no evidence exists about the behavior and the management of BRAF-mutated disease. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: In order to better describe the evolution of BRAF V600E-mutated PAM, we present here all consecutive cases diagnosed in our site during the last 7 years, recording oncological, obstetrical, and perinatal parameters, as well as the therapeutic decisions for both melanoma and gestation. Based on our institutional experience, we weigh the current published evidence and discuss upcoming clinical considerations about the prognosis of PAM, the role of BRAF status, and the possible treatment options during pregnancy in localized or advanced/metastatic disease. Five women were diagnosed with newly metastatic or relapsed BRAF V600E-mutated PAM (four during gestation and one in the 1st year postpartum) between 2012 and 2019. All of them developed extensive metastatic disease with multiple organ involvement, and four developed brain metastases. All cases experienced melanoma progression in less than 6 months under targeted therapy and died soon independently of the followed sequence of treatments. All the neonates were delivered alive and healthy, but one developed melanoma earlier than the second year of life.
RESULTS: Reviewing the literature to confirm our unfavorable outcomes, no specific data on BRAF-mutated PAM were retrieved and current evidence still supports that the prognosis of PAM should be guided by the established risk factors, whereas the management of advanced/metastatic PAM should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
CONCLUSION: More data are required to ascertain whether BRAF-mutated profile adversely affects PAM outcome, although the clinicians should be aware to detect any potential melanoma lesion during pregnancy as soon as possible, treating it locally, regardless of its BRAF status. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The prognosis and management of pregnancy-associated melanoma whether BRAF-mutated or wild type, is currently guided by the same parameters as in the nonpregnant condition. In this special nontrial subpopulation, BRAF-mutated status seems to have a detrimental effect on disease outcome, independently of the following treatments. In early stage melanoma, wide local excision with or without sentinel lymph node dissection may be curative at any trimester of gestation, while in advanced/metastatic setting, therapeutic strategy including immune-checkpoint or BRAF/MEK inhibitors, is more challenging, regardless of BRAF status, and should be based on an individualized decision in each case at a multidisciplinary level. © AlphaMed Press 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF; Melanoma; Pregnancy; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32271498      PMCID: PMC7418358          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  62 in total

1.  Cutaneous melanoma during pregnancy: is the controversy over?

Authors:  Marko Lens; Inger Rosdahl; Julia Newton-Bishop
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Increased mortality for pregnancy-associated melanoma: different outcomes pooled together, selection and publication biases.

Authors:  A Kyrgidis; G Argenziano; E Moscarella; C Longo; R Alfano; A Lallas
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Dabrafenib in patients with Val600Glu or Val600Lys BRAF-mutant melanoma metastatic to the brain (BREAK-MB): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Georgina V Long; Uwe Trefzer; Michael A Davies; Richard F Kefford; Paolo A Ascierto; Paul B Chapman; Igor Puzanov; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; Alain Algazi; Laurent Mortier; Hussein Tawbi; Tabea Wilhelm; Lisa Zimmer; Julie Switzky; Suzanne Swann; Anne-Marie Martin; Mary Guckert; Vicki Goodman; Michael Streit; John M Kirkwood; Dirk Schadendorf
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. American Academy of Dermatology.

Authors:  Christopher K Bichakjian; Allan C Halpern; Timothy M Johnson; Antoinette Foote Hood; James M Grichnik; Susan M Swetter; Hensin Tsao; Victoria Holloway Barbosa; Tsu-Yi Chuang; Madeleine Duvic; Vincent C Ho; Arthur J Sober; Karl R Beutner; Reva Bhushan; Wendy Smith Begolka
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Prognostic significance of pregnancy in stage I melanoma.

Authors:  J H Wong; E E Sterns; K H Kopald; J A Nizze; D L Morton
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-10

6.  Gadolinium periconceptional exposure: pregnancy and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M De Santis; G Straface; A F Cavaliere; B Carducci; A Caruso
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 7.  Cancer and pregnancy: parallels in growth, invasion, and immune modulation and implications for cancer therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Shernan G Holtan; Douglas J Creedon; Paul Haluska; Svetomir N Markovic
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Recent childbirth is an adverse prognostic factor in breast cancer and melanoma, but not in Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Henrik Møller; Arnie Purushotham; Karen M Linklater; Hans Garmo; Lars Holmberg; Mats Lambe; Deborah Yallop; Stephen Devereux
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Estrogen receptor expression in cutaneous melanoma: a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  Vincenzo de Giorgi; Carmelo Mavilia; Daniela Massi; Alessia Gozzini; Palma Aragona; Annalisa Tanini; Serena Sestini; Milena Paglierani; Vieri Boddi; Maria Luisa Brandi; Torello Lotti
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2009-01

10.  Estrogen Receptor β Agonists Differentially Affect the Growth of Human Melanoma Cell Lines.

Authors:  Monica Marzagalli; Lavinia Casati; Roberta M Moretti; Marina Montagnani Marelli; Patrizia Limonta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  MUG Mel3 Cell Lines Reflect Heterogeneity in Melanoma and Represent a Robust Model for Melanoma in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Silke Schrom; Thomas Hebesberger; Stefanie Angela Wallner; Ines Anders; Erika Richtig; Waltraud Brandl; Birgit Hirschmugl; Mariangela Garofalo; Claudia Bernecker; Peter Schlenke; Karl Kashofer; Christian Wadsack; Ariane Aigelsreiter; Ellen Heitzer; Sabrina Riedl; Dagmar Zweytick; Nadine Kretschmer; Georg Richtig; Beate Rinner
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 2.  Melanoma in pregnancy: certainties unborn.

Authors:  Enrico Zelin; Claudio Conforti; Roberta Giuffrida; Teresa Deinlein; Nicola di Meo; Iris Zalaudek
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2020-07-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.