Literature DB >> 32271131

The Fate of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Synthetic Turf System.

Marcus Keller1, Ronald F Turco2, Marianne Bischoff Gray2, Von Sigler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for one-third of infectious outbreaks reported among competitive athletes at high school and collegiate levels of competition, while the frequency of infections among National Football League players is nearly 400-fold higher than in the general population. The increased prevalence of MRSA infections among such athletes necessitates the study of football-specific environments as MRSA reservoirs. HYPOTHESIS: The recovery and viability of MRSA will differ between turf infill and turf fibers. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.
METHODS: Each of 6 infill types and 3 turf fiber types were inoculated with MRSA, sacrificed over time, and enumerated after bacteria extraction and dilution plating to determine the incubation time at which 50% of inoculated MRSA are recoverable and viable (here termed A50). The role of infill toxicity on MRSA survival was assessed using a dialysis assay.
RESULTS: On average, MRSA was available for up to 96 hours on infill (average A50: 13 hours) and 24 hours on turf fibers (A50: 4 hours) (P < 0.001). The A50 for each infill type was also variable among infill groups (P < 0.001), averaging 2 hours (ethylene propylene diene monomer [EPDM] rubber), 7 hours (cork-based material), 9 hours (polymer-coated materials), 12 hours (crumb rubber), 13 hours (thermoplastic elastomer [TPE] rubber), and 27 hours (sands). MRSA remained available on slit-film and nylon fiber types for 12 hours postdeposition and for 24 hours on monofilament fibers. Toxicity assays showed that over 90% of MRSA cells remained viable after 6 hours of exposure to cork infill and sands, while 79%, 71%, 68%, and 17% of MRSA remained viable after exposure to polymer-coated materials, crumb rubber, TPE rubber, and EPDM rubber, respectively. Our data also indicated that organic and sand infills exhibited minimal toxicity to MRSA, while high relative toxicity drives limited MRSA availability in EPDM rubber infill.
CONCLUSION: MRSA recovery and viability varied among infill types but not among differing turf blades. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study can inform appropriate athlete and field management practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; infill; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; survival; turf

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32271131      PMCID: PMC7222665          DOI: 10.1177/1941738120909353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Health        ISSN: 1941-0921            Impact factor:   3.843


  25 in total

1.  In vitro biocompatibility of EPM and EPDM rubbers.

Authors:  F Mast; J A Hoschtitzky; C A Van Blitterswijk; H A Huysmans
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Impact of tire debris on in vitro and in vivo systems.

Authors:  Maurizio Gualtieri; Manuela Andrioletti; Paride Mantecca; Claudio Vismara; Marina Camatini
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 9.400

3.  Infectious disease outbreaks in competitive sports, 2005-2010.

Authors:  Cathal James Collins; Brian O'Connell
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Effect of sunlight on survival of indicator bacteria in seawater.

Authors:  R S Fujioka; H H Hashimoto; E B Siwak; R H Young
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  One-year surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization and skin and soft tissue infections in collegiate athletes.

Authors:  C Buddy Creech; Elizabeth Saye; Brian D McKenna; B Gayle Johnson; Natalia Jimenez; Thomas R Talbot; Thomas Bossung; Andrew Gregory; Kathryn M Edwards
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2010-07

6.  Survival trends of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Clostridium perfringens in a sandy South Florida beach.

Authors:  R L Mohammed; A Echeverry; C M Stinson; M Green; T D Bonilla; A Hartz; D S McCorquodale; A Rogerson; N Esiobu
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.553

7.  A high-morbidity outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among players on a college football team, facilitated by cosmetic body shaving and turf burns.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Begier; Kasia Frenette; Nancy L Barrett; Pat Mshar; Susan Petit; Dave J Boxrud; Kellie Watkins-Colwell; Sheila Wheeler; Elizabeth A Cebelinski; Anita Glennen; Dao Nguyen; James L Hadler
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Recurring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in a football team.

Authors:  Dao M Nguyen; Laurene Mascola; Elizabeth Brancoft
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Synthetic turf: health debate takes root.

Authors:  Luz Claudio
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Epidemics of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vanja M Dukic; Diane S Lauderdale; Jocelyn Wilder; Robert S Daum; Michael Z David
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.