| Literature DB >> 32270959 |
Emilia Nozawa1, Cristiane Domingues Gonçalves1, Patricia Oliva de Almeida1, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar2, Filomena Regina Gomes Galas3, Maria Ignêz Zanetti Feltrim1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare physical therapy strategies involving abdominal muscle stabilization, with and without upper limb movement, in patients with sternal instability after heart surgery and during in-hospital care.Entities:
Keywords: Exercises; Mediastinitis; Muscle Strengthening; Sternum; Surgical Wound Infection
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32270959 PMCID: PMC7089742 DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ISSN: 0102-7638
Fig. 1Flow chart of the study.
Fig. 2Exercise protocol.
Patients' demographic, anthropometric, clinical, and surgical characteristics.
| Variables | ARM (n=10) | LEG (n=10) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 63±8 | 58±13 | 0.120 |
| Gender (male/female) | 5/5 | 7/3 | |
| BMI (kg/cm2) | 30±5 | 30±5 | 0.881 |
| Weight (kg) | 81±14 | 78±11 | 0.543 |
| Height (cm) | 164±8 | 161±9 | 0.739 |
| Previous disease | |||
| Hypertension | 10 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 1.000 |
| Diabetes | 8 (80%) | 4 (40%) | 0.068 |
| Smoking (yes) | 7 (70%) | 7 (70%) | 1.000 |
| Acute myocardial infarction | 7 (70%) | 5 (50%) | 0.361 |
| Dyslipidemia | 6 (60%) | 8 (80%) | 0.329 |
| Coronary artery disease | 6 (60%) | 2 (20%) | 0.068 |
| Obesity | 4 (40%) | 5 (50%) | 0.653 |
| Others | 3 (30%) | 5 (50%) | 0.361 |
| Previous surgery | 0 (0%) | 1 (10%) | 0.305 |
| EF (%) | 59±6.7 | 48±15.1 | 0.029 |
| Parsonnet score | 8.9±7.0 | 7.5±8.4 | 0.699 |
| EuroSCORE | 1.9±1 | 3.1±2.14 | 0.105 |
| Duration of CPB (min) | 52±48 | 63±52 | 0.853 |
| Time of MV (hours) | 14±5 | 13±7 | 0.720 |
| Surgery intervention | |||
| CABG | 9 | 9 | |
| CABG + VR | 0 | 1 | |
| Bentall | 1 | 0 | |
P<0.05
ARM=arm group; BMI=body max index; CABG=coronary artery bypass grafting; CPB=cardio pulmonary bypass; EF=ejection fraction; EuroSCORE=European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation; LEG=leg group; MV=mechanical ventilation; VR=valve replacement
Pre and post-intervention data of reference of pain, discomfort, and functional impairment in both groups.
| ARM | LEG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Pre | Post | Pre | Post |
| Pain | 3.3±2.6 | 1.4±1.8 | 3.3±2.4 | 2.0±2.1 |
| Discomfort | 5.4±2.9 | 2.7±3.4 | 4.7±1.8 | 2.2±1.9 |
| Functional impairment | 4.7±2.2 | 1.9±2.2 | 5.1±2.3 | 1.5±1.4 |
statistical difference between pre and post-intervention, with P=statistical difference < 0.001.
ARM=arm group; LEG= leg group; Pre=pre-intervention; Post=post-intervention
Pre and post-intervention lung function and maximal respiratory pressures.
| Variables | Group | Pre | Post |
|---|---|---|---|
| FVC (L) | ARM | 2.24±0.63 | 2.07±0.63 |
| FVC (%) | ARM | 63.90±13.03 | 59.40±12.73 |
| FEV1 (L) | ARM | 1.69±0.58 | 1.61±0.48 |
| FEV1 (%) | ARM | 56.90±14.53 | 59.00±15.90 |
| PEF (L/s) | ARM | 5.63±1.92 | 4.71±2.38 |
| PEF (%) | ARM | 68.80±25.32 | 60.10±25.32 |
| MIP (cmH2O) | ARM | -73.00±33.09 | -93.50±39.72 |
| MEP (cmH2O) | ARM | 75.50±32.18 | 88.50±39.58 |
statistical difference between pre and post-intervention, with P=statistical difference < 0.05.
ARM=arm group; FEV1=forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC=forced vital capacity; L=liters; LEG=leg group; PEF=peak expiratory flow; MEP=maximum expiratory pressure; MIP=maximum inspiratory pressure
| Abbreviations, acronyms & symbols | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANOVA | = Analysis of variance | InCor/HC-FMUSP | = Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo | |
| ARM | = Arm group | LEG | = Leg group | |
| BMI | = Body max index | MEP | = Maximum expiratory pressure | |
| CABG | = Coronary artery bypass grafting | MIP | = Maximum inspiratory pressure | |
| CPB | = Cardiopulmonary bypass | MV | = Mechanical ventilation | |
| CT | = Computed tomography | PEF | = Peak expiratory flow | |
| EF | = Ejection fraction | SPSS | = Statistical Package for the Social Sciences | |
| EuroSCORE | = European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation | VAC | = Vacuum-assisted closure | |
| FEV1 | = Forced expiratory volume in one second | VR | = Valve replacement | |
| FVC | = Forced vital capacity | |||
| Author's roles & responsibilities | |
|---|---|
| EN | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published |
| CDG | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published |
| POA | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| LAH | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| FRGG | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| MIZF | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published |