Cyclosporine With and Without Systemic Corticosteroids in Treatment of Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Cyclosporine is commonly used in treatment for alopecia areata. It can be administered as a monotherapy or in combination with systemic corticosteroids, with various outcomes.
METHODS: Efficacy of cyclosporine with and without systemic corticosteroids for alopecia areata was evaluated by a systematic review. Cochrane, EBSCOhost, Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched. Only studies published before January 2020 were included.
RESULTS: A total of 2104 studies were initially examined, of which 14 were eligible for the systematic review. Among 340 reported cases, 213 had focal, multifocal or ophiasis form of alopecia areata, 60 were diagnosed with alopecia totalis and 67 with alopecia universalis. The mean response rate in the whole group of patients at the end of treatment was 65.00% (221/340; range 25-100%). Hair regrowth rate was higher in the group with cases of alopecia areata limited to scalp (124/165; mean 75.15%; range 40-100%) than in the cases with alopecia totalis (30/46; mean 65.22%; range 25-100%) or alopecia universalis (24/52; mean 46.15%; range 25-100%). The combined therapy with systemic corticosteroids was superior to the monotherapy (152/219; mean 69.41%; 0-80% vs. 69/121; mean 57.02%; range 6.67-100%) and had a lower recurrence rate (39/108; mean 36.11% vs. 34/46; mean 73.91%, respectively). The combined treatment with methylprednisolone was significantly more effective when compared to the cyclosporine monotherapy (124/183; mean 67.76%; range 0-80% vs. 69/121; mean 57.02%; range 6.67-100%). The mean time of treatment was 6.75 months (range 2-36). LIMITATIONS: Limitations of our study were the retrospective character of included studies, differences in doses of prescribed drugs, and duration of the treatment and follow-up times.
CONCLUSION: Cyclosporine in combination with oral systemic corticosteroids is more effective than in monotherapy for severe alopecia areata.

Key Summary Points

Introduction

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease manifesting itself as a single or multiple patches of non-scarring hair loss. The condition most commonly is observed only on the scalp [1] but sporadically appears on other body parts as well. It affects both the paediatric and adult populations. This disease is characterized by a recurrent hair loss without any clinical inflammatory signs [2] or other systemic symptoms.

The pathogenesis of AA is still unclear. Many highlight that factors such as stress [3], impaired hormonal system [4], infectious agents [5] and genetic predispositions [6] might have some connection with the disease. The interplay between one’s genes and factors present in their environment are likely part of this autoimmune disease [7, 8]. The frequent coexistence of AA with other autoimmune disorders such as hypothyroidism, psoriasis [9] and vitiligo [8] supports this hypothesis.

The disease has a noticeable impact on the patient’s appearance and thus its influence on the quality of life (QoL) is significant [10-12]. In the majority of cases, it is a self-limiting condition (with spontaneous remission within 12 months in about half of the cases [11]). However, when the hair regrowth is not observed, it is important to implement effective treatment. As a result of the lack of clear standards, various medications are used with no coherent guidelines on the dosage and drug administration routes [7]. Many treatment options are currently known, including topical, intralesional or systemic corticosteroids [7], cyclosporine (CsA), methotrexate (MTX) [13], JAK inhibitors [14, 15], diphencyprone (DPCP) [16] and phototherapy [17]. New biological treatments are becoming available [14, 15]; however, many of them are out of patients’ reach because of the associated high cost.

CsA is a calcineurin inhibitor used to prevent allogeneic organ rejection [10] and to treat many autoimmune disorders [18]. CsA is used as an adjunct to corticosteroid therapy for AA as well as in a monotherapy [7, 19]. Protocols with various dosage regimens, treatment durations and corticosteroids used have been described to date [20]. The lack of unambiguous guidelines in the selection of a treatment algorithm for AA is an ongoing issue for evidence-based practitioners.

The aim of this study is to determine the difference in treatment outcomes of patients with AA treated with CsA in monotherapy compared to those receiving CsA with systemic corticosteroids, the risk of relapse in the each treatment regimen, the frequency and the severity of side effects for the compared treatments and the treatment efficacy depending on the type of disease.

Methods

Protocol and Registration

This review was reported in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines [21]. This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Eligibility Criteria

Selection criteria were the use of cyclosporine in monotherapy or in a combination with systemic corticosteroids in patients with AA. Full-text papers of case series and retrospective studies meeting eligibility criteria were included. Conference abstracts following the STROBE statement for conference abstracts [22] were included. Case reports were excluded. Papers in which additional therapies such as PUVA and minoxidil were used simultaneously with the administration of cyclosporine were excluded. Articles which did not report response rates were also eliminated from the analysis.

Information Sources and Search Strategy

Cochrane, EBSCOhost, PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched for eligible studies. Dates of coverage were restricted to articles published before January 2020. The last search was performed on 26 December 2019.

A combination of keywords ‘alopecia areata’ and ‘cyclosporine’ was used as search terms in ‘all fields’ or ‘all text’, or ‘total text’ search category. No time or language criteria were applied.

Extraction of the Data

The articles were screened by two independent researchers. Discrepancies were discussed and resolved by the means of a consensus. The data was obtained from the texts, tables, charts or figures in the papers. Number of patients, age, gender, subtype of disease, treatment regimen dosage, follow-up period and relapses were extracted from the eligible papers.

Data Assessment and Classification

Patients classified in the study were described in papers as “severe”, “refractory” or “at least 50% scalp involvement” AA. Criteria of good response were not consistent—either not provided, evaluated by self-assessment [23] or assessment by clinician with any regrowth [24], at least 50% [25, 26], 70% [27, 28] or 75% [29] regrowth.

Patients were divided into three groups based on their symptoms. Those with focal, multifocal (patchy) or ophiasis-type AA with incomplete (less than 100%) scalp hair loss were simply referred to as “fmoAA”. Alopecia totalis (AT) was assigned for cases with complete scalp hair loss (with the exception of a study by Shapiro et al. [29], who used a criterion of 95% hair loss). Patients presenting both complete (100%) hair loss on the scalp and on other body parts (to various extents) were described using the term of alopecia universalis (AU).

Statistical Analysis

Results were presented using means with ranges and/or standard deviations. As a result of the small number of head-to-head clinical trials comparing two main modalities of the treatment of AA, a naïve direct comparison approach was used. A meta-analysis of proportions with random effects model was used to investigate the outcomes of treatment and recurrence rates. Funnel plots were created to assess the heterogeneity of the results and I2 greater than 50% was considered as substantial. Egger regression test was used to investigate the presence of publication bias. Analyses were created with statistical software environment R 3.6.2 [30].

Study Quality and Risk of Bias Across Studies

A limited amount of data is available regarding the CsA monotherapy and the combined treatment. A vast number of papers present case reports, which were excluded in this study because of their low level of evidence.

Results

Study Selection

A total of 2104 results were retrieved from the database search. Fourteen papers fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in this study. The process of a study selection is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flow chart of data extraction following PRISMA guidelines

Among a total of 340 patients, 213 had fmoAA, 60 had alopecia totalis (AT) and 67 had alopecia universalis (AU). The male to female gender ratio was 155:138 (Lee et al. [31] and Gadzhigoroeva [32] did not provide gender distributions). The mean age of patients was 26.7 years (range 1–80, SD 9.15, 95% CI 21–32.4; excluding missing data in Gupta et al. [33] and Lee et al. [31]). Separating the paediatric population from the adults was not feasible because of the unavailability of data.

In the papers selected, the primary severity of the disease was assessed according to the SALT scale [34], the percentage of scalp involvement, and the size of lesions (in centimetres). In the majority of articles, a “good response” was defined as either a regrowth of more than 50% or as a cosmetically acceptable effect.

Cyclosporine administration was exclusively oral while an intravenous and oral administration was used in the case of systemic corticosteroids (Tables 1, 2).

Table 1

Treatment dosage in selected studies

Authors	CsA dose	CsA dosage	CsA therapy length (months)	GCS type	GCS dose	GCS route	GCS dosage	GCS therapy length (months)
Açıkgöz et al.	2.5–6 mg/kg/day	Once a day	2–12	–	–	–	–	–
Ferrando and Grimalt	5 mg/kg/day (~ 150 mg/day)	Twice a day	6–12	–	–	–	–	–
Jang et al.	50–400 (~ 180.9) mg/day	Once a day	3–36	–	–	–	–	–
Constantopoulos et al.	5–7.5 mg/kg/day	Once a day	6	–	–	–	–	–
Gupta et al.	6 mg/kg/day	NR	3	–	–	–	–	–
Lai et al.	4 mg/kg/day	Twice a day	3	–	–	–	–	–
Yeo et al.	2.5 mg/kg/day	Once a day	4	Methylprednisolone	2.5–5 mg/kg/day	PO	Once a day	4
Lee D et al.	2.5–5 mg/kg/day	Once a day	6	Methylprednisolone	20–24 mg/day	PO	Once a day	6
Lee JR et al.	100–200 mg/day	NR	6	Methylprednisolone	10–30 mg/day	PO	NR	6
Kim et al.	200 mg/day	Twice a day	NR	Methylprednisolone	12–24 mg/day	PO	Twice a day	NR
Shaheedi-Dadras et al.	2.5 mg/kg/day	Once a day	5–8	Methylprednisolone	500 mg/day	IV	3 consecutive days a month	5–8
Shapiro et al.	5 mg/kg/day	Once a day	6	Prednisone	5 mg/day	PO	Once a day	7
Teshima et al.	2.5 mg/kg/day	Once a day	NR	Prednisolone	5 mg/day	PO	Once a day	NR
Gadzhigoroeva	3.5 mg/kg/day	Once a day	4–6	Prednisolone	15 mg/day	PO	Once a day	4–6

CsA cyclosporine A, GCS systemic corticosteroid, PO per os, IV intravenous, NR not reported

Table 2

Effective treatment and relapses in selected studies

Authors	Therapy regime	Type	Number of patients	Number of effective treatments	% of effective treatment	Number of relapses	% of relapses
Açıkgöz et al.	CsA monotherapy	fmoAA	12	5	41.67	NR	NR
		AT	4	2	50.00
		AU	9	3	33.33
Ferrando and Grimalt	CsA monotherapy	fmoAA	5	2	40.00	1	6.67
		AT	2	2	100
		AU	8	3	37.50
Jang et al.	CsA monotherapy	fmoAA	40	28	54.90	22	43.14
		AT	6
		AU	5
Constantopoulos et al.	CsA monotherapy	fmoAA	6	5	83.33	5	83.33
Gupta et al.	CsA monotherapy	fmoAA	6	6	100	6	100
Lai et al.	CsA monotherapy	fmoAA	8	13	72.22	NR	NR
		AT	4
		AU	6
Yeo et al.	CsA + GCS PO	fmoAA	44	24	54.55	8	13.33
		AT	10	4	40.00
		AU	6	3	50.00
Lee D et al.	CsA + GCS PO	fmoAA	19	15	78.95	NR	NR
		AT	7	4	57.14
		AU	8	5	62.50
Lee JR et al.	CsA + GCS PO	fmoAA	19	19	100	20	80.00
		AT	6	6	100
Kim et al.	CsA + GCS PO	fmoAA	32	28	87.50	9	19.57
		AT	11	9	81.82
		AU	3	1	33.33
Shaheedi-Dadras et al.	CsA + GCS IV	AT	6	3	50.00	0	0
		AU	12	3	25.00
Shapiro et al.	CsA + GCS PO	AT	4	2	25.00	2	25.00
		AU	4
Teshima et al.	CsA + GCS PO	AU	6	6	100	0	0
Gadzhigoroeva	CsA + GCS PO	fmoAA	22	20	90.91	NR	NR

CsA cyclosporine A, GCS systemic corticosteroid, PO per os, IV intravenous, fmoAA focal, multifocal or ophiasis-type alopecia areata, AT alopecia totalis, AU alopecia universalis, NR not reported

Assessment of Treatment Efficacy

The mean response rate of the whole group at the end of treatment was 65.00% (221/340; range 25–100%). The overall hair regrowth rates regardless of type of therapy were higher in the group with fmoAA (124/165; mean 75.15%; range 40–100%) than in AT (30/46; mean 65.22%; range 25–100%) or AU (24/52; mean 46.15%; range 25–100%). Articles with missing response rates in alopecia areata were not included in the statistical analysis (applies to Jang et al. [23], Shapiro et al. [29] and Lai et al. [35]).

Assessment of Corticosteroid-Combined Therapy vs. Monotherapy

Efficacy of the combined treatment was higher in comparison to CsA in monotherapy (152/219; mean 69.41%; range 0–80% vs. 69/121; mean 57.02%; range 6.67–100%). Articles with missing information about response rates in each subtype of alopecia areata were not included in the statistical analysis (applies to Jang et al. [23], Shapiro et al. [29] and Lai et al. [35]). Successful treatment in monotherapy was characterised by low heterogeneity in comparison to combined therapy (Figs. 2a, 3a).

Fig. 2

Analysis of proportions for monotherapy: a successful treatment (p = 0.11), b relapses (p = 0.03)

Fig. 3

Analysis of proportions for combined therapy: a successful treatment (p < 0.01), b relapses (p < 0.01)

Methylprednisolone was the most commonly used corticosteroid, administered mainly orally (Shaheedi-Dadras et al. [27] only used the intravenous route), with a mean response rate at the end of therapy of 67.76% (124/183; range 0–80%). The combined treatment with methylprednisolone was significantly more effective in comparison to CsA monotherapy (124/183; mean 67.76%; range 0–80% vs. 69/121; mean 57.02%; range 6.67–100%).

Mean Time of Treatment/Time to Effect

The duration of the treatment ranged from 2 to 36 months. The mean time of the treatment (data not extractable in two studies: Teshima et al. [36], Kim et al. [24]) was 6.75 months (SD 4.36, 95% CI 4.28–9.22).

Time to effect varied from 0.69 to 5.8 months. From the available data from seven studies (which included 180 patients) time to effect was 2.45 months (SD 1.75, 95% CI 1.15–3.75).

Assessment of Recurrence

The total recurrence rate was 47.40% (73/154, range 0–100%). CsA therapy with systemic corticosteroids was characterized by significantly lower recurrence rates in comparison to the CsA monotherapy algorithm (39/108; mean 36.11%; range 0–80% and 34/46; mean 73.91%, range 6.67–100%, respectively). Heterogeneity of both groups was high (Figs. 2b, 3b). Methylprednisolone combined therapy also showed smaller relapse rate compared to monotherapy (37/100; mean 37.0%; range 0–80% vs. 34/46; mean 73.91%; range 6.67–100%).

Assessment of Side Effects

Data regarding the side effects were incomplete and the analysis was conducted on the basis of the available information (Lee et al. [31] and Gadzhigoroeva [32] mentioned the exact side effects, yet did not provide the number of patients affected). If the occurrence of exact adverse effect was mentioned in the article but the number of patients was not provided, we decided to use a ‘≥’ sign instead of ‘=’ next to the countable sum to indicate the presence of this adverse effect. Side effects were observed in 36.76% patients (125/340). Gastrointestinal problems (n ≥ 28), hypertrichosis (n ≥ 20) and hypertension (n ≥ 9) were the most common side effects of therapy, regardless of the therapy regimen. Other symptoms included dyslipidaemia (n ≥ 8), headaches (n ≥ 7), oedema (n ≥ 6), weight gain (n = 6), acneiform eruption (n = 5), hirsutism (n = 5), musculoskeletal complaints (n = 3), respiratory disorders (n = 3), menstrual abnormalities (n = 2), weakness (n = 2), abnormal liver function tests (n ≥ 1), haematuria (n = 1), hyperbilirubinemia (n = 1), gingival hyperplasia (n = 1), paraesthesia (n = 1), urinary tract infection (n = 1), pruritus (n = 1) and ophthalmologic disorders (n = 1). Seven patients (7/340, 2.06%) were withdrawn from the treatment because of unacceptable adverse effects, mostly presenting themselves with hypertrichosis (n ≥ 3) and hypertension (n ≥ 2), as well as menstrual abnormalities, generalized oedema, abnormal results of the liver function tests or abnormal lipid levels.

Assessment of Dosage

A mean dose of 5.1 mg/kg/day (SD 1.01, 95% CI 4.21–5.98 mg/kg/day) in monotherapy was reduced to 3.29 mg/kg/day (SD 1.01, 95% CI 2.48–4.1 mg/kg/day) when systemic corticosteroids were added (the value calculated disregarding the works of Jang et al. [23], Lee et al. [31] and Kim et al. [24] because of a different dosage unit).

Publication Bias

Regression test for funnel plot asymmetry revealed the presence of publication bias on an outcome defined as successful treatment (p = 0.047) (Fig. 4a). Bias did not exist for combined therapies (p = 0.086) (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4

Assessment of risk of bias: a for successful treatment in monotherapy (Egger test, z = 1.718, p = 0.086), b for successful treatment in combined therapy (Egger test, z = 1.984, p = 0.047)

Discussion

The treatment of alopecia areata is demanding and there are no clear guidelines for the therapy. Depending on the severity and the extent of the skin lesions, treatments have varying efficacies—hair regrowth rates depend on the severity of the disease. Our analysis shows that treatment outcomes of AU seem to be poorer for both the mono- and the combined therapy. The cause of recurrence might be withdrawal or discontinuation either of the cyclosporine monotherapy or the combination therapy with systemic corticosteroids. Our analysis supports the hypothesis that if a less extensive area of the body is occupied by the disease, the effects achieved in a combined therapy are better than those obtained when using monotherapy. Combination treatment helped to achieve better outcomes both in hair regrowth and recurrence of disease in comparison to monotherapy. This was possibly due to complex interactions between corticosteroid metabolic pathways [37].

Our analysis showed that the addition of systemic corticosteroids to cyclosporine therapy may be beneficial in severe alopecia areata as it leads to considerably fewer relapses. This point should be further investigated in prospective research. Maintenance of remission phase is the aim for clinicians and is challenging because of the recurring nature of the disease [38, 39]. Gupta et al. [33] reported 100% (6/6) recurrence rate of the disease after discontinuation of the CsA monotherapy. On the contrary, Teshima et al. [36] showed a complete persistence of the regrowth in a group of the same size (6/6) using a combination therapy. Shaheedi-Dadras et al. [27] presented a maintained hair growth after the discontinuation of the combined therapy (3/3).

Compared to monotherapy, cyclosporine combined therapy enables one to achieve the same or better efficacy while using lower cyclosporine doses. It is an important aspect of the treatment, as lower doses of cyclosporine contribute to a decreased risk of developing severe side effects, such as nephrotoxicity or immune suppression [7]. Lee et al. concluded that the combined therapy has a steroid-sparing effect due to decreased toxicity when compared to the CsA or the corticosteroid monotherapy alone [25].

According to Shapiro et al., hypertrichosis is another significant side effect occurring in approximately 80% of patients treated with CsA [29]. It is dose-dependent [26] and likely results from the prolongation of anagen phase [24], as well as the elimination of lymphocytes from hair follicles [25]. Hypertrichosis is an undesirable consequence of the therapy due to occurrence in normally hairless regions and is considered to be one of the most frequent adverse effects, next to gastrointestinal disturbances and hypertension. The adverse effects appear despite the combination of CsA with steroids. Nonetheless, dramatic adverse reactions are not reported in patients in the analysed papers. Lee et al. mentioned that the side effects observed in 12 patients were transient and manageable [25]. Ferrando and Grimalt only reported minimal hypertrichosis among patients [28]. According to Lai et al. the incidence of side effects in placebo and cyclosporine groups was similar and there were no statistically significant differences [35]. In the papers analysed, four patients discontinued therapy as a result of side effects, including hypertension, hypertrichosis and menstrual abnormalities. Unfortunately, it is impossible to assess if the dose of cyclosporine had any impact.

The optimal treatment time is not strictly defined [18]. Reported duration of the therapy ranged from 2 to 36 months. The first effects of successful treatment were observed after 0.69–5.8 months from the start of the therapy.

Study Limitations

Discrepancies in the cases of the separate fmoAA, AT and AU groups of mono- and combined therapy are present. We hypothesize that this is due to the small number of patients in the subgroups.

Moreover, case series included in the analysis consisted of at least six patients, which is a sparse group comparing to observational, retrospective or prospective studies and clinical trials.

Conclusion

Treatment of AA seems to be more effective with CsA in combination with systemic corticosteroids (the most frequently selected therapy was methylprednisolone), which also allows one to reduce the dose of CsA and obtain less severe side effects. The less extensive area of the body is occupied by the disease, the better results might be expected. Moreover, relapses occur less frequently in patients receiving the combined therapy.

Cyclosporine combined with systemic corticosteroids is more effective for alopecia areata than cyclosporine in monotherapy.

The combined therapy allows one to reduce dose of cyclosporine.

Relapses are less frequently correlated with the combined therapy.

Large extend of skin involvement could be a risk factor of a negative treatment response.