Valerie Shuman1, Peter C Coyle2, Subashan Perera3,4, Jessie M Van Swearingen1, Steve M Albert5, Jennifer S Brach1. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined the association between improved mobility and distal health outcomes in older adults using secondary analysis of data from a cluster-randomized controlled group exercise trial. METHODS:Participants were 303 men and women aged ≥65 and older in 32 independent living facilities, senior apartments, and community centers who participated in 12-week groupexercise interventions. Included were those who completed ≥1 follow-up phone call regarding outcomes assessment in the following year. Gait speed and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) were assessed at baseline and immediately after 12-week interventions to determine mobility performance change status. Falls, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations were assessed monthly for 12 months following the end of interventions via interactive voice response phone calls. Incident rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated to quantify incidence of adverse outcomes with respect to mobility performance change. RESULTS: Each 0.05 m/s increase in gait speed resulted in an 11% reduction in falls (IRR = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.94; p < .0001); a similar decrease was seen for each 20 m increase in 6MWD (IRR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; p = .0003). Those who improved gait speed had 61 falls per 1,000 person-months versus 135 in those who had no change/a decline. Those who improved 6MWD had 67 falls per 1,000 person-months versus 110 per 1,000 person-months in those who had no change/a decline. Differences in ED visits and hospitalizations were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Improvements in mobility performance are associated with lower incidence of future falls. Given the exploratory nature of the findings, further investigation is warranted.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We examined the association between improved mobility and distal health outcomes in older adults using secondary analysis of data from a cluster-randomized controlled group exercise trial. METHODS:Participants were 303 men and women aged ≥65 and older in 32 independent living facilities, senior apartments, and community centers who participated in 12-week group exercise interventions. Included were those who completed ≥1 follow-up phone call regarding outcomes assessment in the following year. Gait speed and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) were assessed at baseline and immediately after 12-week interventions to determine mobility performance change status. Falls, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations were assessed monthly for 12 months following the end of interventions via interactive voice response phone calls. Incident rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated to quantify incidence of adverse outcomes with respect to mobility performance change. RESULTS: Each 0.05 m/s increase in gait speed resulted in an 11% reduction in falls (IRR = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.94; p < .0001); a similar decrease was seen for each 20 m increase in 6MWD (IRR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; p = .0003). Those who improved gait speed had 61 falls per 1,000 person-months versus 135 in those who had no change/a decline. Those who improved 6MWD had 67 falls per 1,000 person-months versus 110 per 1,000 person-months in those who had no change/a decline. Differences in ED visits and hospitalizations were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Improvements in mobility performance are associated with lower incidence of future falls. Given the exploratory nature of the findings, further investigation is warranted.
Authors: J M Guralnik; L Ferrucci; C F Pieper; S G Leveille; K S Markides; G V Ostir; S Studenski; L F Berkman; R B Wallace Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jama L Purser; Morris Weinberger; Harvey J Cohen; Carl F Pieper; Miriam C Morey; Tracy Li; G Rhys Williams; Pablo Lapuerta Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 2005 Jul-Aug
Authors: Anne B Newman; Eleanor M Simonsick; Barbara L Naydeck; Robert M Boudreau; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Michael C Nevitt; Marco Pahor; Suzanne Satterfield; Jennifer S Brach; Stephanie A Studenski; Tamara B Harris Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-05-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Paul L Enright; Mary Ann McBurnie; Vera Bittner; Russell P Tracy; Robert McNamara; Alice Arnold; Anne B Newman Journal: Chest Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Luigi Ferrucci; Rachel Cooper; Michelle Shardell; Eleanor M Simonsick; Jennifer A Schrack; Diana Kuh Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Elizabeth A Courtney-Long; Dianna D Carroll; Qing C Zhang; Alissa C Stevens; Shannon Griffin-Blake; Brian S Armour; Vincent A Campbell Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; Valerie Shuman; Alexandra B Gil; Andrea Kriska; Neelesh K Nadkarni; Bonny Rockette-Wagner; Rakie Cham; Jessie M VanSwearingen Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-05-02