| Literature DB >> 32270183 |
Suren Deng1,2, Linghong Lu3, Jingyi Li1,2, Zezhen Du1,2, Tongtong Liu1,2, Wenjing Li1,2, Fangsen Xu1,2, Lei Shi1,2, Huixia Shou4, Chuang Wang1,2,4.
Abstract
Whilst constitutive overexpression of particular acid phosphatases (APases) can increase utilization of extracellular organic phosphate, negative effects are frequently observed in these transgenic plants under conditions of inorganic phosphate (Pi) sufficiency. In this study, we identified rice purple acid phosphatase 10c (OsPAP10c) as being a novel and major APase that exhibits activities associated both with the root surface and with secretion. Two constructs were used to generate the OsPAP10c-overexpression plants by driving its coding sequence with either a ubiquitin promoter (UP) or the OsPAP10c-native promoter (NP). Compared with the UP transgenic plants, lower expression levels and APase activities were observed in the NP plants. However, the UP and NP plants both showed a similar ability to degrade extracellular ATP and both promoted root growth. The growth performance and yield of the NP transgenic plants were better than the wild-type and UP plants in both hydroponic and field experiments irrespective of the level of Pi supply. Overexpression of APase by its native promoter therefore provides a potential way to improve crop production that might avoid increased APase activity in untargeted tissues and its inhibition of the growth of transgenic plants.Entities:
Keywords: Acid phosphatase; Pi deficiency; native promoter; organic phosphate; overexpression; rice; root
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32270183 PMCID: PMC7475256 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eraa179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.(A) Pi concentration and (B) expression of OsPAP10c in leaves and roots of rice during a period of P starvation followed by resupply. Germinated seeds were grown in normal nutrient solution for 10 d and then transferred to solution without Pi for 10 d, followed by 2 d recovery (R) in normal solution. RNA was extracted for quantitative RT-PCR and OsPAP10c expression was normalized to that of OsACTIN. Data are means (±SEM) of three replicates. Significant differences compared with the control (0 d) were determined using Turkey’s test (***P<0.001).
Fig. 2.APase activity in rice Ospap10c mutants. (A) Schematic diagram of deletion mutations at the target sites in two representative knock-out lines generated by CRISPR/Cas9 technology. The sgRNA target sequence is shown and the protospacer adjacent motifs are indicated by the boxes. (B) Root surface-associated APase activity of the wild-type (WT) and pap10c mutants under +P and –P conditions. (C) Secreted APase activity of the WT and pap10c mutants under +P and –P conditions. (D) BCIP staining of the WT and the pap10c-1 mutant under +P and –P conditions. (E) In-gel APase activity assay of secreted proteins extracted from suspension cells of the WT and pap10c-1 mutant. The arrows indicate that the absence of a specific APase isoform in the mutant under Pi-deficient conditions.
Fig. 3.Root-associated APase activity in Arabidopsis Col-0, the Atpap10 mutant, and OsPAP10c complementary lines in the Atpap10 background (L1, L2) under +P and –P conditions. (A) BCIP staining of roots of 7-d-old plants. The scale bar is 1 cm. (B) Quantification of the APase activity. Data are means (±SEM) of three replicates. Significant differences compared with Col-0 were determined using Turkey’s test (*P<0.05; **P<0.01).
Fig. 4.Relative expression levels of OsPAP10c in rice wild-type (WT) and transgenic plants. (A) Schematic diagram of the vectors with the constitutive ubiquitin promoter (UP) and the native promoter (NP). (B, C) Relative expression levels of OsPAP10c in the leaves and roots of the genotypes. The expression levels are relative to that of the wild-type in the +P treatment. Data are means (±SEM) of three replicates.
Fig. 5.(A) Root-associated APase activity of the rice wild-type (WT) and of transgenic plants with OsPAP10c driven by the constitutive ubiquitin promoter (UP) or the native promoter (NP) grown either with or without Pi, or with ATP as the only source of P. (B) Concentration of free Pi in the growth solution for plants grown with ATP. Germinated seeds were grown in normal nutrient solution for 15 d and then transferred to solution either with or without Pi, or containing 0.1 mM ATP as the only source of P. Root-associated APase activities were measured after 10 d treatments. Data are means (±SEM) of three replicates. Significant differences compared with the WT were determined using Turkey’s test (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001).
Fig. 6.Phenotypes and growth of wild-type (WT) rice and of transgenic plants with OsPAP10c driven by the constitutive ubiquitin promoter (UP) or the native promoter (NP) grown either with or without Pi, or with ATP as the only source of P. Germinated seeds were grown in normal nutrient solution for 15 d and then transferred to different solutions for 10 d. (A–C) Phenotypes of seedlings under the different treatments. The scale bars are 5 cm. (D) Shoot height and (E) dry weight of the genotypes under the different treatments. Data are means (±SEM) of six replicates. Significant differences compared with the WT were determined using Turkey’s test (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001).
Fig. 7.Root phenotypes and growth of wild-type (WT) rice and of transgenic plants with OsPAP10c driven by the constitutive ubiquitin promoter (UP) or the native promoter (NP) grown either with or without Pi, or with ATP as the only source of N. Germinated seeds were grown in normal nutrient solution for 15 d and then transferred to different solutions for 10 d. (A–C) Phenotypes of the roots under the different treatments. The scale bars are 5 cm. (D) Root dry weight, total root length, and root surface area under the different treatments. Data are means (±SEM) of six replicates. Significant differences compared with the WT were determined using Turkey’s test (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001).
Fig. 8.P-use efficiency of wild-type (WT) rice and of transgenic plants with OsPAP10c driven by the constitutive ubiquitin promoter (UP) or the native promoter (NP) grown either with or without Pi, or with ATP as the only source of P. Germinated seeds were grown in normal nutrient solution for 15 d and then transferred to different solutions for 10 d. (A, B) P-use efficiency ratio of the genotypes under the different treatments. P-use efficiency was defined as the amount of biomass produced by a given amount of P content in the tissue. (C, D) Total P content of the genotypes under the different treatments. Data are means (±SEM) of three replicates. Significant differences compared with the WT were determined using Turkey’s test (*P<0.05; **P<0.01).
Agronomic traits of wild-type and transgenic plants driven by the native promoter grown in the field under different Pi supply
| Pi supply | Line | Plant height (cm) | Tiller number | Seed-setting rate (%) | 1000-grain weight (g) | Grain number per plant | Grain yield per plant (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LP | WT | 87.36±2.53e | 26.33±3.50a | 72.51±7.56b | 22.56±0.36ab | 1593.49±137.68d | 35.95±3.26e |
| NP-1 | 115.21±2.15bc | 23.83±5.19a | 79.91±3.04ab | 23.91±2.09ab | 2121.44±321.34bc | 50.76±8.92bcd | |
| NP-6 | 124.64±4.62a | 24.67±3.61a | 79.20±5.76ab | 23.47±1.17ab | 1930.03±270.43bcd | 45.48±8.16cde | |
| NP-9 | 113.39±3.97c | 28.17±3.13a | 81.50±3.12ab | 25.01±1.95ab | 1994.97±230.48bcd | 49.67±5.12bcd | |
| HP | WT | 95.46±2.70d | 30.17±5.49a | 74.82±8.57ab | 22.16±1.16b | 1783.01±223.28cd | 39.31±2.77de |
| NP-1 | 119.36±5.00b | 31.00±4.69a | 83.28±2.52a | 24.69±2.36ab | 2818.01±433.94a | 69.00±7.65a | |
| NP-6 | 124.89±4.06a | 26.67±4.59a | 84.37±5.77a | 24.56±1.54ab | 2394.53±235.01ab | 59.00±8.42ab | |
| NP-9 | 113.46±4.31c | 25.33±3.67a | 82.58±5.58ab | 25.49±1.61a | 2133.21±207.66bc | 54.22±4.24bc |
LP, low Pi (without P fertilizer); HP, high Pi (80 kg P ha–1). WT, wild-type; NP, native promoter. Data are means (±SD). Different letters indicate significant differences between the WT and transgenic plants as determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (P<0.05).