Literature DB >> 32269918

Fully automated lesion segmentation and visualization in automated whole breast ultrasound (ABUS) images.

Chia-Yen Lee1, Tzu-Fang Chang1, Yi-Hong Chou2,3,4, Kuen-Cheh Yang5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of breast cancer patients has increased each year, and the demand for breast cancer detection has become quite large. There are many common breast cancer diagnostic tools. The latest automated whole breast ultrasound (ABUS) technology can obtain a complete breast tissue structure, which improves breast cancer detection technology. However, due to the large amount of ABUS image data, manual interpretation is time-consuming and labor-intensive. If there are lesions in multiple images, there may be some omissions. In addition, if further volume information or the three-dimensional shape of the lesion is needed for therapy, it is necessary to manually segment each lesion, which is inefficient for diagnosis. Therefore, automatic lesion segmentation for ABUS is an important issue for guiding therapy.
METHODS: Due to the amount of speckle noise in an ultrasonic image and the low contrast of the lesion boundary, it is quite difficult to automatically segment the lesion. To address the above challenges, this study proposes an automated lesion segmentation algorithm. The architecture of the proposed algorithm can be divided into four parts: (I) volume of interest selection, (II) preprocessing, (III) segmentation, and (IV) visualization. A volume of interest (VOI) is automatically selected first via a three-dimensional level-set, and then the method uses anisotropic diffusion to address the speckled noise and intensity inhomogeneity correction to eliminate shadowing artifacts before the adaptive distance regularization level set method (DRLSE) conducts segmentation. Finally, the two-dimensional segmented images are reconstructed for visualization in the three-dimensional space.
RESULTS: The ground truth is delineated by two radiologists with more than 10 years of experience in breast sonography. In this study, three performance assessments are carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. The first assessment is the similarity measurement. The second assessment is the comparison of the results of the proposed algorithm and the Chan-Vese level set method. The third assessment is the volume estimation of phantom cases. In this study, in the 2D validation of the first assessment, the area Dice similarity coefficients of the real cases named cases A, real cases B and phantoms are 0.84±0.02, 0.86±0.03 and 0.92±0.02, respectively. The overlap fraction (OF) and overlap value (OV) of the real cases A are 0.84±0.06 and 0.78±0.04, real case B are 0.91±0.04 and 0.82±0.05, respectively. The overlap fraction (OF) and overlap value (OV) of the phantoms are 0.95±0.02 and 0.92±0.03, respectively. In the 3D validation, the volume Dice similarity coefficients of the real cases A, real cases B and phantoms are 0.85±0.02, 0.89±0.04 and 0.94±0.02, respectively. The overlap fraction (OF) and overlap value (OV) of the real cases A are 0.82±0.06 and 0.79±0.04, real cases B are 0.92±0.04 and 0.85±0.07, respectively. The overlap fraction (OF) and overlap value (OV) of the phantoms are 0.95±0.01 and 0.93±0.04, respectively. Therefore, the proposed algorithm is highly reliable in most cases. In the second assessment, compared with Chan-Vese level set method, the Dice of the proposed algorithm in real cases A, real cases B and phantoms are 0.84±0.02, 0.86±0.03 and 0.92±0.02, respectively. The Dice of Chan-Vese level set in real cases A, real cases B and phantoms are 0.65±0.23, 0.69±0.14 and 0.76±0.14, respectively. The Dice performance of different methods on segmentation shows a highly significant impact (P<0.01). The results show that the proposed algorithm is more accurate than Chan-Vese level set method. In the third assessment, the Spearman's correlation coefficient between the segmented volumes and the corresponding ground truth volumes is ρ=0.929 (P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the proposed method can batch process ABUS images, segment lesions, calculate their volumes and visualize lesions to facilitate observation by radiologists and physicians. 2020 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated whole breast ultrasound (ABUS); intensity inhomogeneity; lesion segmentation; level set; visualization

Year:  2020        PMID: 32269918      PMCID: PMC7136742          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2020.01.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  36 in total

1.  Distance regularized level set evolution and its application to image segmentation.

Authors:  Chunming Li; Chenyang Xu; Changfeng Gui; Martin D Fox
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 10.856

2.  Intensity inhomogeneity correction for the breast sonogram: constrained fuzzy cell-based bipartitioning and polynomial surface modeling.

Authors:  Chia-Yen Lee; Yi-Hong Chou; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Yeun-Chung Chang; Chui-Mei Tiu; Chung-Ming Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of breast lesions.

Authors:  D O Watermann; M Földi; A Hanjalic-Beck; A Hasenburg; A Lüghausen; H Prömpeler; G Gitsch; E Stickeler
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Yi-Wei Shen; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Li-Ren Chiang; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.

Authors:  Athina Vourtsis; Aspasia Kachulis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Mammographic breast density and race.

Authors:  Marcela G del Carmen; Elkan F Halpern; Daniel B Kopans; Beverly Moy; Richard H Moore; Paul E Goss; Kevin S Hughes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Multi-dimensional tumor detection in automated whole breast ultrasound using topographic watershed.

Authors:  Chung-Ming Lo; Rong-Tai Chen; Yeun-Chung Chang; Ya-Wen Yang; Ming-Jen Hung; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Segmentation of malignant lesions in 3D breast ultrasound using a depth-dependent model.

Authors:  Tao Tan; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Cristina Borelli; Rashindra Manniesing; Jan van Zelst; Lei Wang; Wei Zhang; Bram Platel; Ritse M Mann; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound images using quantitative tissue clustering.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Chung-Ming Lo; Rong-Tai Chen; Yi-Wei Shen; Jung Min Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Wei-Wen Hsu; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  5 in total

1.  Attention-VGG16-UNet: a novel deep learning approach for automatic segmentation of the median nerve in ultrasound images.

Authors:  Aiyue Huang; Li Jiang; Jiangshan Zhang; Qing Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

2.  An automated and multiparametric algorithm for objective analysis of meibography images.

Authors:  Peng Xiao; Zhongzhou Luo; Yuqing Deng; Gengyuan Wang; Jin Yuan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

3.  Evaluation of the performance of traditional machine learning algorithms, convolutional neural network and AutoML Vision in ultrasound breast lesions classification: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ka Wing Wan; Chun Hoi Wong; Ho Fung Ip; Dejian Fan; Pak Leung Yuen; Hoi Ying Fong; Michael Ying
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

4.  A Multi-Task Learning Framework for Automated Segmentation and Classification of Breast Tumors From Ultrasound Images.

Authors:  Jignesh Chowdary; Pratheepan Yogarajah; Priyanka Chaurasia; Velmathi Guruviah
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  Evaluation of a new method of calculating breast tumor volume based on automated breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Ma; Shan Meng; Sha-Jie Dang; Jia-Zhong Wang; Quan Yuan; Qi Yang; Can-Xu Song
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.