| Literature DB >> 32269658 |
Carlos Lago-Fuentes1,2, Ezequiel Rey1, Alexis Padrón-Cabo1, Javier Prieto-Troncoso1, Javier Garcia-Núñez3.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to verify the occurrence and effect size of relative age effect in professional futsal players, by observing how its presence and impact change according to the season, team level and player position. The sample was composed of 1873 professional futsal players who played in the First Division of the Spanish National Futsal League between seasons 2006-2007 and 2014-2015. The players' birthdates were divided into quarters (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4). A relative age effect reversal was observed in the professional futsal players for the nine analyzed seasons. A relative age reversal effect was observed in high and medium level teams. Finally, a relative age effect reversal was also found for the goalkeeper and pivot positions. The results could suggest that players that initially experienced maturity disadvantages in major sports, can have a second chance to emerge in professional minor sports (i.e. futsal vs. soccer). However, the underlying mechanisms why a reversal occurs are still unclear, and more studies focusing on the mediators of the effect are needed.Entities:
Keywords: performance analysis; playing position; talent development; team level; team sport
Year: 2020 PMID: 32269658 PMCID: PMC7126250 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Number of players analyzed by season and playing position.
| 31 | 39 | 68 | 45 | 183 | |
| 42 | 39 | 76 | 49 | 206 | |
| 38 | 43 | 92 | 28 | 201 | |
| 39 | 45 | 86 | 35 | 205 | |
| 40 | 47 | 90 | 42 | 219 | |
| 41 | 43 | 95 | 39 | 218 | |
| 37 | 39 | 92 | 35 | 203 | |
| 41 | 42 | 90 | 38 | 211 | |
| 40 | 40 | 104 | 43 | 227 | |
| 349 | 377 | 793 | 354 | 1873 | |
Figure 1Distribution of birthdates of 1873 futsal players between the 2006-2007 and 2014-2015 seasons.
Distribution of birthdates subdivided by season.
| Variable | % | % | % | n | % | z-valu e | χ2 | OR | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 0.08 | ||||||||||||||||
| 14.70 | 0.93 | ||||||||||||||||
| -0.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 46 | 25.1 | -0.6 | 3 | 0.10 | 0.83 | |||||||||
| 2006-2007 | 38 | 20.8 | 50 | 27.3 | 49 | 26.8 | 1.94 | 0.59 | |||||||||
| -2.0* | 0.4 | 0.8 | 60 | 29.1 | 0.7 | 3 | 0.21 | 0.57 | |||||||||
| 2007-2008 | 34 | 16.5 | 53 | 25.7 | 59 | 28.6 | 8.49 | 0.04 | |||||||||
| 0.0 | -0.8 | 1.0 | 53 | 26.4 | -0.2 | 3 | 0.12 | 0.83 | |||||||||
| 2008-2009 | 44 | 21.9 | 45 | 22.4 | 59 | 29.4 | 3.00 | 0.39 | |||||||||
| 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 48 | 23.4 | -1.2 | 3 | 0.07 | 1.00 | |||||||||
| 2009-2010 | 48 | 23.4 | 51 | 24.9 | 58 | 28.3 | 1.30 | 0.73 | |||||||||
| -0.9 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 61 | 27.9 | 0.3 | 3 | 0.13 | 0.70 | |||||||||
| 2010-2011 | 43 | 19.6 | 57 | 26.0 | 58 | 26.5 | 3.52 | 0.32 | |||||||||
| 0.0 | -0.1 | -0.7 | 64 | 29.4 | 0.8 | 3 | 0.11 | 0.75 | |||||||||
| 2011-2012 | 48 | 22.0 | 53 | 24.3 | 53 | 24.3 | 2.51 | 0.47 | |||||||||
| 1.3 | -0.8 | -1.4 | 61 | 30.0 | 1.0 | 3 | 0.13 | 0.85 | |||||||||
| 2012-2013 | 52 | 25.6 | 45 | 22.2 | 45 | 22.2 | 3.40 | 0.33 | |||||||||
| -0.1 | 0.2 | -0.1 | 57 | 27.0 | 0.0 | 3 | 0.08 | 0.81 | |||||||||
| 2013-2014 | 46 | 21.8 | 53 | 25.1 | 55 | 26.1 | 1.30 | 0.73 | |||||||||
| 1.5 | -0.5 | -0.3 | 57 | 25.1 | -0.7 | 3 | 0.04 | 1.04 | |||||||||
| 2014-2015 | 59 | 26.0 | 53 | 23.3 | 58 | 25.6 | 0.37 | 0.95 | |||||||||
Notes: χ2 = test value of the chi-square test; p = level of significance; V = Cramer´s V; OR = Odds Ratio; Z-values indicate if the observed count within a specific cell is significantly larger or smaller than the expected count. * Significant difference.
Distribution of birthdates subdivided by team level.
| Variable | % | % | % | n | % | z-value | χ2 | OR | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 19.05 | 6 | 4 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| 0.0 | 2.2 | -0.9 | 58 | 23. | -1.3 | 0.29 | 0.1 | 0.93 | |||||||||
| Low | 54 | 22. | 74 | 30. | 59 | 24. | 7 | 3.77 | 3 | 2 | |||||||
| -1.1 | 2.8* | -1.6 | 182 | 26. | -0.1 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.76 | |||||||||
| Medium | 13 | 20. | 191 | 28. | 164 | 24. | 9 | 9.34 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| 1.1 | - | 2.1* | 267 | 28. | -1.0 | <0.0 | 0.1 | 0.82 | |||||||||
| High | 21 | 23. | 195 | 20. | 4.2* | 271 | 28. | 0 | 17.39 | 3 | 01 | 4 | |||||
Notes: χ2 = test value of the chi-square test; p = level of significance; V = Cramer´s V; OR = Odds Ratio; Z-values indicate if the observed count within a specific cell is significantly larger or smaller than the expected count. * Significant difference
Distribution of birthdates subdivided by playing position.
| Variable | % | % | % | n | % | z-value | χ2 | OR | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <0.00 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 40.29 | 9 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| 1.0 | 1 | 2.3 | -0.6 | 81 | 21. | -2.7 | 0.20 | 0.1 | 1,12 | ||||||||
| Defender | 91 | 24. | 1 | 29. | 95 | 25. | 5 | 4.61 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| 1.0 | 1 | -2.0 | 0.5 | 220 | 27. | 0.6 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.83 | ||||||||
| Winger | 18 | 23. | 7 | 22. | 214 | 27. | 7 | 7.31 | 3 | 0 | |||||||
| 2.0* | - | 0.2 | 103 | 29. | 1.0 | 0.02 | 0.1 | 0.89 | |||||||||
| Pivot | 92 | 26. | 6 | 18. | 3.1* | 95 | 26. | 1 | 9.78 | 3 | 7 | ||||||
| -4.4* | 1 | 3.3* | -0.3 | 103 | 29. | 1.1 | <0.00 | 0.2 | 0.45 | ||||||||
| Goalkeeper | 46 | 13. | 1 | 31. | 90 | 25. | 5 | 28.36 | 3 | 1 | 9 | ||||||
Notes: χ2 = test value of the chi-square test; p = level of significance; V = Cramer´s V; OR = Odds Ratio; Z-values indicate if the observed count within a specific cell is significantly larger or smaller than the expected count. * Significant difference