| Literature DB >> 32269522 |
Markus Herkt1, Ariana Foinquinos1, Sandor Batkai1, Thomas Thum1, Andreas Pich2.
Abstract
Cardiac diseases are the most frequent causes of death in industrialized countries. Pathological remodeling of the heart muscle is caused by several etiologies such as prolonged hypertension or injuries that can lead to myocardial infarction and in serious cases also the death of the patient. The micro-RNA miR-132 has been identified as a master-switch in the development of cardiac hypertrophy and adverse remodeling. In this study, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) was utilized to establish a robust and fast method to sensitively detect and accurately quantify anti-microRNA (antimiR) oligonucleotides in blood plasma. An antimiR oligonucleotide isolation protocol containing an ethanol precipitation step with glycogen as oligonucleotide carrier as well as a robust and reproducible MS-analysis procedure has been established. Proteinase K treatment was crucial for releasing antimiR oligonucleotides from plasma- as well as cellular proteins and reducing background derived from biological matrices. AntimiR oligonucleotide detection was achieved from samples of studies in different animal models such as mouse and pig where locked nucleic acids-(LNA)-modified antimiR oligonucleotides have been used to generate pharmacokinetic data.Entities:
Keywords: absolute quantification; mass spectrometry; microRNAs; pharmacokinctics; therapeutic oligonucleotides
Year: 2020 PMID: 32269522 PMCID: PMC7109322 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Chemicals and reagents used in this study.
| Substance | Specifications |
| AA matrix-solution | 10 mg/mL; 5 mg/mL L-Fucose in 70% methanol |
| ACN | |
| Acryl-/Bisacrylamid | |
| AHC solution | 300 mg/mL; |
| ATT matrix-solution | 5 mg/mL; 5 mg/mL L-Fucose in 100% H2O |
| Bradford reagent | |
| CaCl2 | dehydrated; |
| CHCA matrix-solution | 10 mg/mL; 5 mg/mL L-Fucose in 50% ACN; 0.1% TFA; |
| DABP matrix-solution | 15 mg/mL; 5 mg/mL L-Fucose in methanol/HCl: 80/3 v/v; |
| DHB matrix-solution | 20 mg/mL; 5 mg/mL L-Fucose in 50% ACN |
| EDTA | |
| Ethanol | |
| Fixation solution | 25% isopropanol; 10% acetic acid; 65% Millipore water |
| L-Fucose | |
| glycogen | 20 μg/μL; |
| HPA matrix-solution | 50 mg/mL; 5 mg/mL L-Fucose in 50% ACN |
| Laemmli buffer | 100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.8; 10% SDS (w/v); 100 mM DTT; 3% glycerol; 2 mg/mL Bromphenol blue |
| Methanol | |
| NaCl | |
| PageBlue protein staining solution | |
| Page RulerTM prestained protein ladder | 10 – 250 kDa; |
| Proteinase K GoldTM | 0.2 g; A ≥ 30 U/mg protein (Hemoglobin, pH 7.5, 37°C); isolated from |
| Proteinase K digestion buffer | 10 mM Tris pH 8.0; 10 mM EDTA pH 8.0; 100 mM NaCl |
| Proteinase K solution | 40 mg/mL proteinase K; 50 mM Tris pH 8.0; 10 mM CaCl2 |
| SDS-separating gel (12%) | 4 mL 30%/0.8% Acryl-/Bisacrylamid (w/v); 2.5 mL 1.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 8.8; 3.35 mL Millipore water; 100 μL 10% SDS (w/v); 50 μL 10% APS (w/v) (Serva); 5 μL TEMED |
| SDS-stacking gel (5%) | 1.67 mL 30%/0,8% Acryl-/Bisacrylamid (w/v); 2.5 mL 0.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 6.8; 5.69 mL Millipore water; 100 μL 10% SDS (w/v); 50 μL 10% APS (w/v); 10 μL TEMED |
| SDS-running buffer | 25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.3; 192 mM glycin; 0.1% SDS (w/v) |
| THAP matrix-solution | 40 mg/mL; 5 mg/mL L-Fucose in 90% ACN |
| Tris | |
| Tris–HCl buffer | 1.5 M; pH 6.8/8.8 |
| Water | Distilled; |
Oligonucleotides used in this study.
| Substance | Specifications |
| antimiR oligonucleotide Scr (scrambled) | Seq: ACGTCTATACGCCCA; |
| antimiR oligonucleotide 24 | Seq: CTGCTGAACTGAGCC); |
| antimiR oligonucleotide 132 | Seq: ATGGCTGTAGACTGTT; |
FIGURE 3LLOQ and area of quantification of antimiR132. For determination of the LLOQ and AOQ with MALDI-MS, antimiR oligonucleotides were spotted into murine plasma, extracted, and analyzed by MALDI-MS in three replicates per oligonucleotide concentration with the LLOQ being at 0.25. The equation of the calibration curve was y = 0.4013x + 0.0331 with a coefficient of determination of 99.77%. The LLOQ is indicated by a red box.
Mouse PK study plan.
| Intervention | Substance | Dosing | Number of animals per time of blood collection | Σ | ||||||
| 3 min | 30 min | 1 h | 9 h | 24 h | 3 days | 1 weeks | ||||
| i.v. | antimiR | 20 mg/kg | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 21 |
| Control | Control | Control | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 21 |
Pig PK study plan.
| Parameters | EDTA plasma | Organs | ||||||||||||||||
| Intervention | Substance | Dosing | 15 min | 30 min | 1 h | 6 h | 12 h | 24 h | Heart | Liver | Kidney | Brain | Lung | Spleen | Ovary | Skin | Fat | Muscle |
| i.c. | antimiR | 0.5 mg/kg | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| i.c. | antimiR | 1.17 mg/kg | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| i.c. | antimiR | 5 mg/kg | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| i.c. | NaCl | – | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Control | Control | Control | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
FIGURE 1Workflow of antimiR oligonucleotide detection using MALDI-MS.
FIGURE 2Limit of detection (LOD) of antimiR132. For determination of the LOD, antimiR oligonucleotides were spotted on a MALDI target plate after isolation from murine plasma. Analyses were done in 10 replicates and the peak area (=signal intensity) were plotted against concentration. The LOD is 0.5 pmol.
FIGURE 4Murine plasma concentration of antimiR132. After application of 20 mg/kg antimiR132 i.v., mouse plasma levels were assessed utilizing MALDI-MS.
FIGURE 5Porcine plasma concentration of antimiR132. After application of 5 mg/kg antimiR132 i.c., pig plasma levels were assessed using a mass spectrometry-based method for quantification. CV = 3.6 – 24.2%.